this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
592 points (98.8% liked)

News

29223 readers
3515 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Who wants to tell him that we get that right whether he supports it or not?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 206 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This comment, all by itself, is an impeachable offense. Sigh.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 105 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He swore an oath to the very thing he doesn't give a shit about.

The constitutional crisis happened on swearing in day.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The person being sworn in as President by the Chief Justice that day was ineligible for office according to the 14th Amendment section 3. And he could only do that because Congress neglected its Constitutional duty to enforce that provision.

That is all three branches of the government colluding to break the Constitution to put an ineligible man into the highest office.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All three branches ran by his sycophants, the Republicans.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's hard to imagine how he could have sycophants among those people in the first place. Those people, despite their low moral character, are among the highest echelon of politicians in this country. It's weird that they'd just fall in line.

Well, we know that some of them are simply afraid of the money that he's grifted for campaigns. And on top of that, my current guess is that Trump, a Russian agent, has been given access to all sorts of kompromat to blackmail them with.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can you imagine if Obama said this? Did literally any of these things?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Many things are impeachable offenses; but nothing is convictable.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 96 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We treat him better than any criminal and he still cries about being treated unfairly... anyone else in America would be behind bars right now.

[–] ITeeTechMonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We even have a real life example of this with all of the January 6th convictions resulting in jail time whereas his Highness was protected by a fascist judge who stalled the court proceedings at every opportunity.

Judge Aileen Cannon needs to be removed from her position, never be allowed to hold any judicial or public office position, and charged with obstruction of justice.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Absolutely, and it also didn't help that Merrick Garland (who, let me remind you, was only nominated for SCOTUS in the first place because Obama thought he was so conservative that not even McConnell could object to him) slow-walked the case for two years to begin with.

A jury of his peers literally found him guilty of several felonies.

Upon sentencing, the judge said, "Woopsie! I guess we can't put you in prison because you're a president now. Oh well."

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 82 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Someone fucking murder Trump already.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 28 points 3 days ago

Trump is just the highly visible part of a whole cancerous growth. All of the right wing, with its "outgroups to bind and in-groups to protect" worldview, needs to go.

[–] InsincereLogic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm a foreigner, but the gun to attempt ratio surely doesn't add up statistically, surely? Those are rookie numbers, y'all gotta' pump those up!

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's a bit of the bystander effect, and the fact that he's in office now, and not just protected by secret service. Bush Jr. Saw the White House get fortified into a military facility. It has fucking anti-aircraft defenses. Obama saw the motorcade get overhauled into a series of what amount to tanks. Supposedly the glass and armor can withstand at least one RPG hit( the type with the shaped charged that cuts through steel) .

Whatever defenses Trump didn't know he had in 2016, he knows about now and then some. A straight up assassination isn't feasible - even if you could get ahold of his actual schedule, the type of equipment you'd need to reach him is way out of the hands of your normal citizen.

And then, even if you could get your hands on that equipment - you have to be able to use it. That drastically narrows the number of people who can pull it off to pretty much exclusively former military. And most of that kind of stuff isn't "lone Wolf" stuff so now it's further reduced.

Further anyone who goes around and admits they have the Intel, the training, the equipment, and the plan to do it in any capacity online will probably be outed before they can pull it off.

The only way the Regime goes down is by popular resistance. The only way we get to popular resistance is through protesting in person and seeing the numbers and communicating without leaving traces.

It's happening, but it's slow because the US is so unfathomably spread out. It takes time to move people places where we are used to instant communication. The Regime knows this. That's why they send military convoys to arrest a guy posting flyers identifying HSI personnel. They can only delay at this point, but they're either too stupid to realize that every thing they try now adds fuel to the fire, or they intend for it to all fall apart anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Fun fact! Murder is "the unlawful killing of a human being with malice". If it's lawful, e.g. in self defense, it's not murder.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

No, not without Vance, Musk and Thiel.

Just need to lure him into enough American primary schools and it becomes statistically inevitable. Have him go on a campaign with a sharpie marking up all those big pull down maps and let him write gulf of America on them. He'd love that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Just wait till it affects him personally and he will.

[–] thoughtfuldragon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It already did and he got off scot-free because of it.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In classic Conservative fashion he benefited from due process when he needed it and now he wants to remove it so others can't benefit from it.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

George Washington saw this coming

"[…] cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

Two would-be assassins tried to circumvent due process. Due process benefits all without regard for politics. Or it should.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 3 days ago

Yes, my immediate thought: he will when he's tried for treason. Not that that will help him, if he and his Business Plot 2.0 co-conspirators are ever tried. So will W, Cheneys, Rices, and if we're lucky, hrc.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Asked in the interview whether U.S. citizens and noncitizens alike deserve due process as laid out in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, Trump was noncommittal.

“I don’t know. I’m not, I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know,” Trump said when pressed by Welker.

Do you need to be a lawyer to be aware of the Bill of Rights? He's been President for more than 4 total years, head of the executive branch charged with executing the law for the entire country, has a whole staff of lawyers advising him, and has, himself, pled the 5th (!) and he's still not even familiar with the 5th amendment?

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

And he's sworn to uphold the Constitution (though a serial liar like him is about as trustworthy as a fox watching the chicken house)

[–] Batman@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Dementia is a path to many inconsistencies some consider to be... a big deal

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If any other president ... Democrat or Republican ... had come out and said the things Turnip has said over the years, they would have lost their political careers by now

The problem isn't this orange idiot, the problem is the mass of people, politicians, funders, enablers and wealthy backers who want this moron in power. Turnip is a powerless fool .... it's the people who keep him power that are the problem

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

If any other president … Democrat or Republican … had come out and said the things Turnip has said over the years, they would have lost their political careers by now

Ideally, they would've been hanged for treason by now.

[–] notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Immediately disqualified from office. Whoever stops this menace is going to be considered a national hero, regardless of their methods.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Dear Canada and Europe, please save us from the Republicans.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If that's not one of the first questions Monday morning from the White House Press pool they should all be fired. What other Oaths does he not know if needs to uphold? What other parts of the Constitution which he took an oath to defend and uphold does he not believe in?

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 6 points 2 days ago

Well, as another example, he doesn't know what rhe Declaration of Independence is about. See timestamp 3:18. https://youtu.be/GBwCUPttprw

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 20 points 3 days ago

I N A L I E N A B L E

R I G H T S

Fucking with them is a spectacularly bad idea, just ask the British.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So the social contract is null and void.

And force is the only thing backing up power now with only resistance stopping it.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It would be hilarious if instead of asking this, the reporter asked him to define "due process"

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Of course I know what due process is. A lot of my friends are due process experts, and they're always telling me 'Donald, you do so much process. Nobody does process as brilliantly as you.'"

[–] Corno@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is coming from the same administration that thought transgenic mice were transgender mice. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he actually comes out with something like this.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 9 points 2 days ago

I noticed recently that the annotated constitution website suggests visitors to search "due process" in the search bar.

https://constitution.congress.gov/

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Presidents should do something, like some form of oath, to uphold this kind of things. And pass a test to ensure they understand all the complicated words.

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Remember when he wouldn't put his hand in the Bible when he took his oath of office?

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This isn’t facebook, no one cares if he follows esoteric religious traditions.

The problem is that he won’t follow legal requirements that protect us normal people.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah but it's funny that his base of evangelical Christians doesn't give a shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

I don't support constitutional due process for him either

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So if he doesn’t support it does that mean you cant violate the constitution if he’s removed by any means?

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well he's the president, so he should really get clear on that. Immediately.

[–] Thoven@lemdro.id 7 points 2 days ago

He is clear on it, he just doesn't want to admit it

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

Oh he wants to waive his due process rights, then?

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Ooh ooh I know the answer!

He doesn't.

Has this not been established the past few months?

load more comments
view more: next ›