I don't think there's anything maga could do that's worse than what Starmer is doing to himself.
njm1314
Yes I'm aware that's what that entire last sentence I wrote is referring to. I thought that was very clear...
However I'm also speaking to the fact that the idea of a filibuster in general, no matter what the rules of it are, is also undemocratic.
When it comes to how democracy functions it's exactly the same.
And why is it not a problem? You just you just stated that as if it's commonly agreed upon.
Is that really the same universe though or is it just an Easter egg?
I wasn't aware they made more than three...
I think you're kind of overselling the cultural significance of Scream.
Kind of think Martin Luther would disagree.
You don't think there's anything inherently undemocratic about 41% of the population being able to control 59% of population?
Never mind that the filibuster doesn't even have to be 40%. One guy is all it takes to make use of the filibuster as long as he's got the stamina for it. That 60/40 is just because senators are inherently lazy and don't want to do the extra work.
They certainly should because filibusters are inherently undemocratic, but they never have before and I don't seem doing it now or anytime soon.
I think Neil Gorsuch is Episcopalian actually.
Yeah Gen 4 was my exit from the main games too. I just remember everything being so bloody slow in that game. Everything took so long. Just using cut required a cut scene.
So if I'm reading the article right it would save like 500k? That's it? Fuck over all the blind people in your nation to save half a million? What's that as a percentage of taxes like .00001%