jjjalljs

joined 2 years ago
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 34 minutes ago

"Whoever told you that is your enemy"

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 23 points 3 hours ago

I don't accept the premise that working a job to make someone else rich is axiomatically good.

Many jobs make the world worse. I'd rather someone sit at home and play Tetris than build murder-drones, or work on some sort of AI powered stalking-ad company.

Many of the jobs are just bullshit. Another "AI" company? Another product manager with no real decision making power? A few billion dollars poured into "the metaverse"? Waste of time and resources.

That aside, most jobs make the owners rich while labor gets a few crumbs. You work all day making widgets. The boss pays you $10. They sell your widgets for $1000. That's a bum deal. But there's a thousand desperate people waiting to take your spot, plus union busters eager to betray labor and beat you up. Pay people the real value of their labor, and treat them with respect, and you'd likely get more people working.

Johnson is a heretical, hypocritical, piece of shit. No one should take him seriously. His church should -- wait, he's southern baptist? The "we're going to split off because we want slavery" sect? Not surprising. Those assholes suck.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 19 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

I get the vague impression that this is meant to subtly influence western society into believing that the masses aren’t truly people

Tinfoil hat theory would be that the evil leaders of real life (the ceos, the billionaires, etc) are planting the seeds so that if their plans fail and a revolution comes, they won't be summarily executed

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 29 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like some of this is fundamentally wrong. Like it says such and such saves money, but cutting that program costs untold amounts as a consequence.

Like you can save money by not paying your phone bill, but then you don't have a working phone.

So the nyt probably sucks by not making that clear to readers.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 20 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Who watches this slop? I just... why. There are so many good books, movies, tv shows, whatever. Stop watching slop.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 18 hours ago

Ok then no system works because any system can be sabotaged. Democracy can be subverted in various ways. Making a sandwich can be ruined by any number of methods. That's not a useful way to look at the world.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This sounds like more of the "socialism never works [because conservatives/capitalists sabotage it]"

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago

Most messages are so short I don't see why you'd need a summary. Are people that poor at reading that like 10 sentences is a struggle? If so, education seems like what we should spend millions of dollars on.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 2 days ago

I think there's some truth to this. Specifically, a lot of people are sort of reflexively conservative. That is, they don't like change. If zohran gets free bus fare in, a lot of people who fight it now will fight to keep it.

I think some famous conservative said something once about how they can't let social programs get in because people like them too much.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 3 days ago

He could use some of that money for more immediate good. Start paying off people's school debt. Build housing. Whatever.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 41 points 3 days ago (4 children)

the nation will see that democratic socialism will get them what they were promised.

What's that old saying like "none are so blind as those who will not see"? I feel like people are so emotionally invested in "socialism bad, democrats bad" that it's going to be hard for them to accept contradicting that.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Yeah I think that's one of the things people that don't always get.

Like you walk down the street and no one's going to say hi to you, or engage with you much at all. People think that means we're unfriendly. No, it's more that we see ten thousand people every day and there's no way to engage with all of them. Some of them don't even have a shared language.

But if someone needs help? People step up. I saw a lady trip and fall down the stairs at the subway and a whole lot of people fake running over to make sure she was okay. Bike accident? Lots of people that had been in the background suddenly were helping.

People aren't perfect. I saw a guy screaming at a woman he was with and no one stepped in, but I like to think there's a line past which more people would intervene.

edit: fix autocomplete error

 

Like I saw one that was titled "I wonder why rule" and had a picture about overpaid CEOs or something.

Why "rule"? What's the origin of this format?

view more: next ›