Spend billions of dollars on public education, with a focus on critical analysis, starting 50 years ago.
Failing that, I don't know, get rid of the ultra wealthy?
I don't know how I feel about ai slop that promotes good ideas. That sounds like a deal with the devil. But if there is going to be slop, I'd rather it be promoting stuff like "workers together are stronger"
People need to stop watching slop. But I feel like the kind of idiots easily swayed by slop are also the kinds that won't stop watching it.
Yeah I'm at a job that pays dirt, and doesn't pay for holidays. I asked my boss if he could just say my assignment on Thanksgiving was to eat dinner, and pay me for the day. He was like "mm maybe", but had to ask his boss. She, allegedly, said no.
I'm not watching a video but based on the title "capitalism is theft" I can guess what it says.
The problem is we can barely get people to understand that the company is not their friend and they have any rights at all.
You can't teach a child calculus if they can barely do arithmetic. People are fish that don't realize there's water. It's going to be hard to get them to build a space program. A noble goal, but not one with an easy direct path.
I feel like every retro I've attended has been a farce.
"What went bad? We said doing it this way would be harder and more risk prone. Management insisted we do it that way, and it took longer than and caused a site outage."
"What should we do differently?'
"Listen to the team next time"
"That won't happen"
In the US I think it varies a lot from town to town and teacher to teacher.
I had a history teacher in like 10th grade (age ~15). He spent the first bulk of a lesson one day telling us stuff. Everyone was wrapped up in what a good story this was about whatever. Then, in the end of the class he was like "everything I just told you is bullshit. It's alterations, omissions, and lies to make the story sound better for the victors."
I don't remember what the actual subject was, but it was a good lesson in not blindly accepting what a charismatic guy in a suit tells you.
Depending on how the html is structured, you might be able to use adblock or tamper monkey to filter it out (in a browser. Apps are less supportive of this)
I have several stories on this I like to tell.
I worked at a startup in NYC that was doing job-search related stuff. Find job postings, get resume advice, that kind of stuff. Someone in the customer service department found an article online about salaries, shared it, and then people were talking about how much they got paid. Management came down hard on this, and said it was a fireable offense to talk about salary. Everyone got real quiet on the topic after that. Was it illegal for them to do that? Maybe! But laws only matter when they're enforced, and a bunch of entry level people making $30-50k a year don't have the means to launch a legal challenge. That's even if there's enough solidarity to try, and the effort won't be scuttled by scabs and bootlickers.
For extra irony, a couple years later the company launched an "Are you getting paid enough?" salary comparison tool.
I worked at a different startup in NYC. This one loved data. Data data data. They had t-shirts made that said stuff like "Data doesn't care about your feelings" or whatever.
People started agitating about salary transparency. They wanted to know how much people were being made, because there was a sense that not everyone was getting paid the same for the same work. Also, some of us had in secret started comparing notes, and found some wide gaps.
Well, the CEO wasn't having it. He said "we have salary bands", but wouldn't provide more detail on the range of the bands, who was in what band, and how it all worked. Just we have salary bands and they're fair.
People didn't like that, so he tried changing tactics. He said, "Who here thinks they're being paid too much money? No one? No one wants a pay cut. Right. So that's why we're not going to release the specifics." As if the only solution to Amy being paid too little is to lower Bob's pay.
This is the same CEO, at the same "we love data" company, that when people brought up studies about four day workweeks being more effective, just shut it down with "We're not doing that."
Management and ownership don't care. They don't care about what's legal or just. They care about power, and profit as a close second. I knew a guy that worked in a factory, and the owner reportedly would say stuff like "If you assholes unionize I will burn this place to the ground, and I don't care if you're inside or not."
There need to be institutions, with teeth, to stop these kinds of things. If ownership even whispers an anti-union sentiment, they should lose everything.
Many times the people who would make the best decisions are not authorized to make decisions.
Should we go into the office every day? Well the workers say no, objective productivity measurements say no, the environment says no, but some insipid sack of shit feels like it's better.
Should we spend twenty minutes improving this process? No, some higher up who doesn't understand software development decided that we don't do it that way. Keep doing it manually.
Should we compensate people well enough so they don't leave after a year or two? No, pay the absolute minimum and keep hiring entry level people. Saving so much on labor costs!
I'd rather have health than maybe marginally better cooking experiences
the truth is that what we did didn’t affect them as much as we expected, and most people don’t care as well :(
Most people don't really care about anything. They won't put up with a little inconvenience. Worse than toddlers.
No one needs more than $5 million. That's enough for a conservative investment portfolio to give you a mid six figure income without doing any labor. Watch TV all day and eat chips, still net six figures.
Maybe then no one can afford mega mansions and mega yachts, but I'm okay with that. We don't need that much concentration of wealth.