this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
339 points (96.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33972 readers
780 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elaborate and explain

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 201 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The billionaires are already winning, with no signs of that changing.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 103 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That’s because—for many reasons—there are way too many non-billionaires on team billionaire.

[–] SkaraBrae@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I worked with a guy that proudly proclaimed that he voted for the right because they looked after the rich.

He was not rich, but he purchased lottery tickets weekly and stated he'd rather get screwed while poor than pay more tax if he, some day, became rich.

And that was the day I realised that we're fucked.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't, I feel like moron / stupid just doesn't cut it for idiots like this. I honestly don't know of an adjective the fully encapsulates the stupidty, childishness, and naivite of a regular person aligning with the super rich.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Ah, see, what you should have done was.....stabbed him in the eye.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Just remember, when we go vote, his is worth just as much as yours.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey, don't look at me. I'm on team "unexpected astroid hitting the earth to end it all".

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 16 points 3 days ago

collapsed inline media

I was devastated when my candidate never showed up again and again...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrippyHippyDan@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

They will just cook the planet killing us all

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 46 points 3 days ago (35 children)

If we decide money no longer matters it'd be petty easy to eliminate them all. If we continue to let money run our lives then it'll continue to be pretty easy for the people with money to keep all their power.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If we decide money no longer matters it’d be petty easy to eliminate them all

Okay, but then where will I get my passive income? I worked 40 years in the shit and rusty needles mine to build up a big enough nest egg to get passive income. Now I'm too full of staff infections and lacerated limbs and shit lung to work anymore.

I can't afford not to make the next guy work himself to death in the shit rust needle mine.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 6 points 3 days ago

His people are infected. I think he might be a billionaire in disguise.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Why you think they're tossing so much money to develope ai and humanoid robots?

When shit will hit the fan they want their own private army to watch their ass, but at the same time they don't want highly trained human mercenary inside their golden castel getting strange ideas.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Omg you are right on this. They see most of as disposable once they're able to consistently get away with it.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Which is now. They just need something safe to keep "that" up in the eventuality that civilization/economy collapse.

[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 31 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It’s funny cause no one seems to realize that the billionaires are human beings. They have a house, they shit, they piss, they bleed, etc. And yet, everyone is somehow convinced that becoming a billionaire makes you somehow invulnerable.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

An individual with a net worth of “just” $1b can afford to spend upwards of $50m per year on privacy and security, all while continuing to live a lavish lifestyle of excess and see their net worth continue to grow.

That’s more than the annual US household income being spent on a daily basis.

Now consider that the top 10 billionaires have more than 140x that amount.

Yes, they are made of flesh & blood, and are susceptible to all of the same maladies as you or I — but especially post Luigi, they are shoring up their defences to the point that even a motivated individual would have just as much chance of becoming a billionaire as they are to getting to one.

I would hope to be proven wrong, and to see a true working class uprising against them in my lifetime - but alas, I think they are too effective at keeping us arguing against ourselves to ever pose a serious risk to their hegemony.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dil@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago (6 children)

they win because they throw money at enough ppl to build a wall of ppl to protect them

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This is happening right now and the billionaires are winning.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 23 points 3 days ago (5 children)

If the people were all invested in taking out the billionaires, then the people would win, hands down.

But if, as in the current situation, the people have higher priorities, in which 50% do not find billionaires to be an existential threat, and at least 300 million think they are simply temporarily embarrassed billionaires themselves, then the billionaires win, that is, until the Earth inevitably cannot support them any longer.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Billionaires, because we are too dumb to not fall for their tricks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

The billionaires spend a small fraction to some idiots to betray their fellow non-billionaires. It's probably about a million people versus the masses.

It's not the billionaires but the antisocial, amoral whores who will sell their souls for money and do their bidding that are the problem (police, army, etc.), and those who would quietly acquiesce. And of those there are way too many in some societies for change to be easy/possible.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I belive the billionaires is currently winning

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But only because the other 8 billion let them

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

All evidence points to a regime change (in the physics sense, not the political) being the necessary condition for things to go from our current state to something new.

We currently have people paying poorer people a very small amount of their own net worth to protect the wealthy person's status and position. This is similar to how kings and queens paid the army and policing forces to control the peasants.

Before the French Revolution I am sure it seemed impossible that the peasants would revolt, but the years leading up to the revolution things were getting worse and worse for the average peasant. There is a tipping point where the average person does not think the current system is delivering on the promise that of you do what you are told you can have a good life. I think we are approaching that point now.

If the rich try to hire someone and underpay them for security, stiff contractors for services, flaunt laws and generally behave obnoxiously at some point people will have had enough. Whether that ends with guillotine action or people just divesting from those systems depends on how much freedom people think they have.

If people thought they could go and homestead, live off the land, and get by without the massive companies these billionaires own then they would have that outlet and choose that peaceful option. The fact that we have taxation creates a pressure to pay in currency which demands earning in that currency. Same with paying rent, you have to earn money simply to live. No amount of growing all of your food gets rid of your financial obligations, so there is no out from the system. If that system is unreasonable it begins to feel less like participation and more like coercive control. Wage slavery is not the same as slavery, but both involve coercion and require the legal system to support them. Both lead to revolutions. Both lead to violence.

I guess the billionaires have to decide if they really want to paint that big a target on their backs by flaunting their wealth. At this point I think they feel untouchable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately that is not how the figures really are. Way too many of those 8 billions will willingly simp and fight the rest of us in the name of those billionaires.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seems like the billionaires are winning 🤷🏼‍♀️ ?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I mean... Look around? Maybe billionaire is a new thing, but it is just modern royalty. We still have kings, they just got better PR.

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 13 points 3 days ago

The billionaires. People dumb AF. Billionaires have money to manipulate people to think they are doing good while they are fucking humanity.

[–] splount@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If organized, the billionaires lose. It's really that simple and that difficult.

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Okay, then go start organizing?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

8 billion temporarily embarrassed millionaires.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

3000 billionaires because you can't convince everybody to ditch school. You can't change people. Pharaoh, Hammurabi. Those are thousands of years of genetic obedience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

While arriving for the competition, all 8 billion got wedged into the doors of the arena Three Stooges style and were unable to compete.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Tje billionaires are winning now and the reasons are obvious.

The 8 billion are unable to think clearly, identify problems and organize. The billionaires are focused on their goals and super influential. They're able to buy loyality of the key less fortunate people and enforce loyality of others. They can also buy media to influence thinking of the masses.

If it was just about numbers, the billionaires would lose. But it's not.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Assuming the 8b were all of the same mind, they would win. But we all know there are quite a few that the billionaires could buy to fight for them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 7 points 3 days ago

Their divide and conquer strategy is busting our asses.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Ok, let’s look at this…

IF billionaires were removed from the picture, what would be the result?

There would be investment assets in various holding entities that would then be what, up for grabs? Sold off? Put in probate? Trillions in stock alone would suddenly be ownerless. How would that affect the market and the regular person’s investments?

Multiple BoD positions and CEO positions opening up. How would those be compensated? Just make more people rich?

Material possessions originally worth absurd sums now up for grabs to nobody who could realistically afford to use or maintain them (yachts, palatial homes, etc). Manufacturers of luxury goods would vanish (stupidly expensive watches, clothes, cars).

How would you prevent some other greedy, power-hungry f_cks from taking up the reins and putting us right back where we started? There is no point in civilization’s history where greedy f_cks haven’t existed, so how do you prevent their grubby fingers from tipping the scales right back in favor of piling all the money and power in their corner?

What are the unintended consequences?

(This is NOT an argument implying we should keep billionaires, just asking realistically and pragmatically what the result would be should they no longer exist)

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago
[–] shovingleopardnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The implication that they would all be killed or completely stripped of assets is the problem you’re trying to solve, however, that doesn’t have to be the action taken. Perhaps instead, the 8 billion people of the world decide to enact a society that insists that such accumulation of wealth is obscene and should be curtailed. Perhaps systems could be introduced to make the wealthy more accurately contribute to the society they profit off.

Billionaires become billionaires through exploitation. Exploitation of workers, financial systems, and political power for personal gain. Make them pay for all these things.

Pay for education of the people they use to build their companies. Pay for the healthcare of the entire population, which they degrade with their business practices. Pay for the infrastructure that enables them to do business. The roads, the safety nets, the national parks, the air quality, the water supply, the land they use. Make them pay to replace and repair, fully, any damage their business causes. Polute the stream, pay to fix it. Dig the ground for ore, repair the ground so it can be used again. Make them replace what they take from society for little or no cost because their goods are only affordable because they do not reflect the true cost of production. Make their businesses pay for all these things, and the cost of production will rise to include the true cost of production. At the moment, the shortfall is paid for by we, the people, which enables them to become billionaires. Exploitation.

We don’t have to kill anyone, or strip anyone of all their assets in some revolutionary action. We just have to make them pay the true cost of their exploitation.

Tax the rich. Use those taxes to repay their exploitation. Increase the cost of doing business to include the cost of repairing the impact.

People can still become very wealthy. But society will also become much stronger through the use of the extra revenue to benefit all.

To make this happen will take a revolution, but it doesn’t need to include guillotines, it just needs people to become aware. Sadly, the politicians and media are also owned by the billionaires, making the final step of collective uprising extremely difficult. But humans have done it many times before in the face of adversity, perhaps it can happen again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Emil_Zatopek1982@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just stop believing that those 3000 are billionaires. If 8 billion people say "No, you are not rich" those fuckers become poor. Money is a religion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xzot746@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Over 1 million Russians killed and how many tens of thousands in Gaza. 3000 would be quite easy compared to the innocent.

Yes markets would be in shit but so what, take their wealth and distribute it. The entire financial system is made out of thin air now, everyone will be all worried to justify why not to do it but we need to do it for our civilization to grow beyond having the Poor's do all the work for the greedy pigs.

The entire system needs to change and they won't go easy, it will be tough and bloody.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Huh, it's up to 3000 now.

If it's actually clearly and openly defined as a fight with two sides, 8 billion people. IRL billionaires are just kind of the visible tip of a giant inequality iceberg, so it's not so simple.

load more comments
view more: next ›