this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
763 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

71897 readers
4371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 183 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

USA could have spent money developing an electrified economy but the republicans are focusing on bringing back coal mining and reshoring shoe manufacturing instead.

This admin has set the USA back 100 years.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which kind of blows my mind. Coal miners should love EVs. There was a story in the news a few years ago about how nice it was for the miners to help someone in an EV, as if they should be mortal enemies.

Non-EV cars don't run on coal, they run on gasoline. EVs on the other hand can run on coal, natural gas, solar, wind, you name it - and still are more energy efficient than cars burning gasoline. In a sane world, coal miners would be throwing their support behind electric vehicles. The utility companies seem to understand this, but seems like the support hasn't made its way up the supply chain.

[–] Litics@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 16 hours ago

Of course US trucks run on coal. I see them rolling coal all the time! They cant roll coal if it wasnt coal. Duh...

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Especially when you see some of the tech being rocked in Asian cities

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This admin has set the USA back 100 years.

Again. They already enshrined "billionaires get all the money" in the one legislative victory of trumps first term.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

But… but… those good ol’ days felt so good! We need to relive those days!

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't exclusively a problem of the new administration, or the previous. All administrations since the late 20th century have been compliant in allowing the offshoring of most industry

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago

It’s not just industry. Now they’re killing the development of skills and knowledge in engineering (hardware, software) and design

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 11 points 1 day ago

The problem is systemic, it didn’t start with Trump. He’s just way more flagrant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And in the US we just block foreign options because it is gov policy to artificially support specific corporations.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 50 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

the country of free market capitalism...

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Oddly libertarians never acknowledge that market leaders ask for theses things. The biggest threat to the free market are capitalists themselves.

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

American libertarianism is just a form of nationalism mixed with a strong dose of "don't nose into muh life"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 44 points 1 day ago (12 children)

i hate musk, but i am not wild about our dependence on china either, so i am not really sure who to root for in this fight...

[–] SpaceRanger13@lemm.ee 99 points 1 day ago (20 children)

I would say go with whatever company that doesn't have a CEO throwing Nazi salutes.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah, the Chinese manufacturers are out to make money, and at least we know what to expect from them.

Besides, being profitable usually means making a better product than your competitors.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago (11 children)

GASP!

You mean... Proper capitalism!?

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Root for better public transport and active cities instead of car dependency :)

[–] StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The public transport bus I take to and from work is a Chinese made electric. It's a Yutong E15.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Competition is good for the consumer. More options from more players will encourage more charging infrastructure and (ostensibly) more innovation. It's not just Elon Musk vs China. Every automaker that wants to sell cars in the USA is on notice. If they want to compete in the EV subcategory, they need to focus on price and performance. People want budget-conscious EVs.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Everywhere is depndent on China, buy the car that isnt overtly a fascist car. They also suck.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

as customers switch to Chinese EVs

Sure. That's the reason.

[–] killabeezio@lemmy.zip 75 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I don't think that's what they meant. I think they are just saying that people are still buying EVs, but they are just going to Chinese and other manufacturers instead of buying a Tesla. The article specifically calls out the stupid shit Elon has been doing.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 day ago

Which is important because about a year ago the headlines were saying EV sales were collapsing. In fact, it was just Tesla having less market share of new EVs sold because other manufacturers got off their ass.

[–] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 8 points 14 hours ago

Not even sure it's that true though. Afaik BYD is only the 14th most popular car in Denmark, and European brands have risen from around ~28% last year to ~40% this year. Sure, Chinese carmakers have had some growth - but we're talking in the order of something between 2 - 4% of the market. Might be more popular in other countrues

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 28 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Looking forward to Tesla reporting Q2 earnings next month. I assume another round of disastrous numbers paired up with some vaporware distraction. Perhaps they can keep this charade going, but at some point reality will catch up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 25 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Even before the current political situation I wouldn't have bought a Tesla. They have a documented quality problem and not very good customer service at least outside of the US.

Why would I buy a car that is not only more likely than most to break but when it does break it's hard to get fixed. Spare parts are notoriously hard to get hold of and you usually have to deal with Tesla directly which is a problem because they don't have a lot of dealerships in the UK. Also they won't come to you, so if your car won't start you have to arrange a pickup.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago

Good, continue with the downward spiral.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hitler was "incendiary" and "political" but I think there's a four-letter word so much better, so much more concise, that this wording is actual disinformation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pirate@feddit.org 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Chinese electric cars are just better. BYD is what Tesla wanted to be, but actually fulfills its promises. Plus it isn't ran by a nazi dictator.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I uh.. you sure about that dictator thing? xi jinping enters the chat

[–] Pirate@feddit.org 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

If you think Xi Jinping is dictating what BYD does with their cars then you don't understand the fundamentals as to why China managed to attract so much foreign investment and got to where they are now in the first place.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (6 children)

Foreign investment was because of cheap labor and companies being subsidized by the communist government......

BYD might make a better car than Tesla, but saying that a Chinese company isn't "under the control of Xi Jinping", the guy who crushed Hong Kong for having too much independence and wants to do the same with Taiwan, is laughable.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Here in the UK Musk is just seen as an idiot. Some decent European EV solutions coming along but the Chinese cars are so much better value than Tesla OR the main European makes. Couldn't happen to a nicer megalomaniac and as a plus I love seeing the monthly SpaceX explosions

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›