L3s

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] L3s@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (11 children)

Not going to argue with you about it here

This has all been ridiculous.

Have a good one.

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (13 children)

Not an excuse.

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (15 children)

Not going to argue with you about it here, but the short is: if that's true, when I messaged you, you should have just had a conversation with me about it instead of all of this.

Have a good one.

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Well thanks for understanding. The question itself was not a problem, hopefully that helps as well.

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (19 children)

Because as the mod that removed the post, I'd like to give you my perspective if you'll let me.

  • OP made a post that seemed to break rule 5 (we had multiple reports on it), and did not seem like a good-faith question breaking rule 1, so I removed the post
  • OP then makes a second post being fairly passive towards me, further showing that they were not posting in good-faith. So once again, removed the post for rule 1 and 5, messaged OP as well explaining this. This could have been a temp ban, I was being nice here, and reaching out to give OP the chance to explain they were not posting in bad faith.
  • OP then posts 13 times about the above in other communities, breaking some of the rules in those communities.

As mods it's mayhem if you don't enforce your rules, which is all I was trying to do, we have each rule to keep the community from getting out of control and offtopic. If we had no rules, the community would be filled with a bunch of trolls and offtopic posts.

IMO OP has proved multiple times now that their question was not in good-faith, and they were seeking out arguments (check their other comments) and drama (see the 13 posts).

Icing on the cake: we left their rephrased question up to avoid more of this drama, OP still kept posting the screenshots.

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (26 children)

Just want to make sure I understand, you blocked a community because they removed a post that broke their rules?

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for understanding

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

censored

censored

Those sentences are obviously not being excellent to other commenters here. To avoid a ban (you have broken this rule twice, I'm being lenient) please follow rule 3.

Thanks

[–] L3s@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Your comment was removed for violating rule 3.