yarr

joined 2 years ago
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 2 points 3 days ago

That's why I wish someone would steal my coin right before I throw it in. It's win-win

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago

Is it wrong I thought of RFK when I read this?

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I propose a herpes and SARS party for her.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I mean, statistically at least ONE person must... especially if they were a federal worker that was fired.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This feels kinda far fetched. It's like saying "well, we won't need cars, because we'll all just have jetpacks that we use to get around." I totally agree that eventually a useful model will run on a phone. I disagree it's going to be soon enough to matter to this discussion. To give you some ideas, DeepSeek is a recent model. It's 671B parameters. Devices like phones are running 7-14B models. So, eventually what you say will be feasible, but we have a ways to go.

 

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and innovation, both blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) have captured significant attention.

Let's think about blockchain for a bit. Blockchain technology has been met with considerable hype, promising revolution across various industries. However, this enthusiasm has not translated into success for most ventures in this space. Research indicates that approximately 95% of blockchain startups fail within a year of operation. Contributing factors include market volatility, regulatory hurdles, and the lack of clear use cases.

A notable example is the collapse of Terra's LUNA cryptocurrency in 2022. In just one week, $45 billion was lost, illustrating the inherent risks associated with blockchain projects.

AI startups are now experiencing their own wave of excitement and investment. However, they too encounter significant challenges. Over 80% of AI projects fail due to issues like insufficient market demand, operational difficulties, and ethical complexities.

Consider this: approximately 42% of AI startups fail because there is insufficient demand for their products or services. Not to mention, many AI ventures struggle with resource mismanagement, inadequate expertise, and scaling difficulties. You also have the additional challenge of navigating the evolving landscape of AI ethics and regulations adds layers of complexity that can impede progress. There's not exactly decades of history to refer to regarding legal precedent with AI.

A lot of the hype and marketing I see today looks just like what I saw a few years ago, except instead of "blockchain" it says "AI" now. There are consulting firms, integration firms, everything. Is this just a sign the industry is just endless fads with no actual commercial usage?

Bitcoin was hyped as reinventing the world's economy. Sure, it found a few usages, like replacing Western Union, or also by essentially becoming "digital gold" that people can just acquire and sit on, but last time I looked, VISA/Mastercard and the like were still doing 98% of the world's commerce. In other words, Bitcoin fell far short of where many of its proponents said it would land years ago. Looking around at all these AI firms, I wonder how many of them will even exist in 3 years.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have to assume that most of these “swindled” people were low-information voters

I'm sorry, if you're a low information voter in the information age, you are getting what you deserve. How many of these people share links on Facebook with memes that can be disproven with a 5 minute visit to the library? This is the "science is fake" crowd I'm talking about. They are constantly surrounded by information and turn up their nose at it. They are proud to be ignorant. Well, there's a real cost to being ignorant, and that cost is being swindled by con-men. The very same con-men will blame things on Biden, and I'm sure not 100% of the voters will wake up, but they didn't want to listen before and they made this bed. Now we ALL have to lie in it.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

I’m struggling to believe these articles are anything but pandering to the left.

There's not exactly any good news to go around, so chuckling at the misfortunes of others is all we have. I'm very aware I'm on the same sinking ship. My only hope is to stay alive while this happens and hopefully still be on board when the holes are patched.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t know what the appropriate response is. Empathy is hard.

Sorry, my tank is empty from the constant bullshit during COVID. Can't wear a mask to help prevent the immunocomprised? Well, here's your FREEDOM. It's finally here. I hope they get what they were wishing for. All those red states wishing us ill while the blue states supported them with our tax dollars. No more! Don't wan't FEMA? Wish granted! Good luck on those hurricanes!

 

Let's face it folks -- if you've gotta live in a country going through chaos, you might as well have a bit of fun on the way down. One of the few things that perks me up each morning is seeing headlines like "Trump Supporters Worried About Losing Their Federal Jobs" or "Republican Voters Worried They Might Not Get Their Social Security Checks". Well folks, when Trump was promising chaos in the run-up to the election, this is what he was talking about. All these federal departments getting turned over and eviscerated is exactly what he said he'd do. Supposedly, this is what you all wanted!

If you're a multi-millionaire and you voted for Trump, I get it. It seems like a really good idea. If you're working class, or even crazier, dependent on government aid, and you voted for Trump, holy crap... you were swindled.

I hope eventually our country gets back on the track to being sane. It's a shame that it's much, much, much easier to tear down things than it is to create them. I look forward to the mid-terms and I hope the Democrats get their heads out of their asses, because we could really use the help. In the meantime, I'll be drinking up all those delicious "Trump supporter tears" and not feeling bad at all.

 

Alright, so I’ve been seeing these videos floating around where people are legitimately surprised by things Donald Trump has done—things he actually promised to do during his campaigns. The common thread in all of these reactions is something like, “Well, he said he’d do it, but I didn’t think he’d actually go through with it!”

And here’s the thing: if someone votes for a politician who doesn’t follow through on their promises, isn’t that kinda bad? Like, wouldn’t you want the person you voted for to keep their word? So why is this a thing now? Is this just people messing around and trolling, or did they genuinely think Trump wasn’t going to do what he said he’d do?

I mean, maybe it’s because of how unpredictable Trump was during his presidency. He had a habit of saying things one way but then doing the opposite, which could’ve made some people doubt whether he’d actually follow through on his big promises. But now that he is following through on some of those things, it seems like people are genuinely caught off guard.

So here’s what I’m wondering: is this something to celebrate? Like, is it a good thing that people didn’t think Trump would keep his word? Or is it just another example of how the political landscape has changed in ways no one expected?