this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
763 points (99.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

36001 readers
3160 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™ (idk if this is real)

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 52 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It's satire. Original tweet was about an environmentally friendly radar system from Raytheon

The fact that so many people actually fell for it is worrying not just because reality itself has become satire but because this post should be painfully obvious. Ain't nobody marketing missiles to anyone who cares about the carbon footprint.

[โ€“] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not going to lie. I believed it and thought 'wow between this and the knife missile that greatly reduces civilian casualties Rathiyon are probably most morally upstanding war profiteirs of our era'

now I am just disappointed

[โ€“] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 15 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

The knife missile was actually kinda awesome in its own way tbh. Ridiculous precision for super long distance murder with as few casualties as possible.

It's also frightening that it exists.

[โ€“] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

the knife missile is so emblematic of the entire military industrial complex. can't stop engaging in unnecessary resource wars due to unnecessary casualties. instead, the military industrial complex will develop and sell a product to allow the killing of specific people in public spaces. and the more you think about the idea of being at a produce stand and someone standing next to you turning into a fine red mist, never to exist in physical space again, the more distopian it seems.

it reminds me of the episode of star trek where they encounter a planet that has eliminated war via coordinated computer simulations and voluntary genocides.

[โ€“] _apokalipto_@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Knife missiles are real things?? Scary stuff. I'm about half way through the Culture series at the moment, never heard of them before..

[โ€“] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's the Hellfire AGM-114R-9X

A while back it was used to kill some dude without the other people in the same house being collateral damage, so it got meme status for a while.

[โ€“] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Question. Are the knives really needed? I feel like getting hit with what is essentially a 5 foot long, 7 inch wide bullet, travelling at mach 1 would prove to be equally efficient at killing single targets, as strapping knives to it.

[โ€“] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

There have been times it's been used against a whole carful of people, and cars are bigger than seven inches.

[โ€“] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 hours ago

it reduces the risk of missing because the target bent over to pick up a quarter, or stepped to the side because they saw something interesting. the knives in question are basically swords that deploy radially from the missile body like an umbrella.

If we're going to have missiles, knife missiles are a good thing

[โ€“] FatVegan@leminal.space 9 points 9 hours ago

A lot of things are pretty normal today that would've been satire 10 years ago

[โ€“] ceenote@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aircraft shot down over shallow waters can even turn into coral reefs! Wow!

And just think about all the thankful sea critters feasting on the bodies!

[โ€“] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 28 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

make a better future for the children of the world by blowing up half of it

[โ€“] bss03@infosec.pub 26 points 20 hours ago

What? The green revolution doesn't deserve anti-aircraft capabily?

[โ€“] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 22 hours ago

!NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.works

!NonCredibleDefense@piefed.social

[โ€“] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

Killing is good way to reduce your CO2 footprint

[โ€“] aesthelete@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Lefty nonsense

[โ€“] Agent641@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

Carbon neutralized

[โ€“] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

You're not going to beat the mosquito or rotavirus when it comes to environmentally friendly killers. Lethality, prodigious. Carbon footprint, minimal (small amount of flatulence, don't worry about it). This comment was sponsored by Gnawed VPN.

[โ€“] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe the next iteration can have some seeds mixed in the payload to sprout little trees and plants over the wreckage.

[โ€“] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I heard they're coming out with a new one that does have the seeds but they're all non-natives selected for maximum ecological impact. You win some, you lose some

[โ€“] LoonyLenny@lemdro.id 7 points 22 hours ago
[โ€“] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Nothing will ever top "clean coal".

[โ€“] solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Competition for Veridian Dynamics

[โ€“] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Veridian Dynamics. We can. But we won't. Yet.

[โ€“] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 5 points 21 hours ago

NonCredibleDefense is leaking again...

[โ€“] Avicenna@programming.dev 5 points 18 hours ago

this should be in not the onion if real

Frutiger Anti-Aero

[โ€“] MoribundMurdoch@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This reminds me of Jeremy Kauffman's ad, "War is Gay," which advocated for making militarism as gay as possible. The point is that militarism, or zabernism, is considered acceptable and even encouraged as long as DEI quotas are met within the military. https://youtu.be/kdfym6LKpQ0

[โ€“] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I would argue against having military, but that'd be pointless. If we're going to have it, it should be as representative of the population as possible. It might save the lives of underrepresented citizens when we're invading.

[โ€“] MoribundMurdoch@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So you actually believe a military should have quotas based on arbitrary characteristics such as race or gender, tied to the population it is meant to protect? That is, if the population is around 50% women, the military should attempt to have 50% women in all positions? And that any disparate outcome would be evidence of racism or sexism? Would that be your position taken to its extreme, while your actual position has the same essence but is much more sensible in degree? Or what do you think?

[โ€“] rumba@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

*edit: please don't downvote mori on this, those are absolutely valid questions and a chance to clarify without angry rebuttal is always welcome

So you actually believe a military should have quotas based on arbitrary characteristics such as race or gender

Not arbitrary at all. I think the makeup should exactly mirror the population distribution as closely as it can. We invade places, it's hoards of guys and it's a lot of rape and pillage and less worry about illegal orders. I think a proper distribution would help that out a lot.

And that any disparate outcome would be evidence of racism or sexism

Nope, don't give a shit about that at all. I just think they should try to have our military not being 99% white men covering each others asses doing shit they shouldn't. DEI isn't just about combating racism/sexism, it's making sure that the staffing matches the population. A team with 20% minorities will be less likely to be overzealous on minorities. A team of 50% women will be less likely to rape or allow the rape of women in action zones.

Would that be your position taken to its extreme, while your actual position has the same essence but is much more sensible in degree? Or what do you think?

Not quite sure I grasp that series of questions. I don't think they should force minorities/women into the military, but they should try hard to be representative and mix everyone together. Nothing beats sexist/racist views in individuals like working closely with people of other races/sexes. Hell it might even drive out people that should have power over other people.

It's obviously not without issue. But we need more mixing of culture/race/sex on the daily basis or we'll be in this while male superiority complex society forever.

[โ€“] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago

Looks mostly grey to me

[โ€“] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Thank the gods for that!

[โ€“] gothic_lemons@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Is this fucking real?

[โ€“] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but is it using recycled plastics?

[โ€“] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

*recycled plastic explosives