wizardbeard

joined 2 years ago
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Then you have to create a framework for evaluating the effect of the addition of each source into "positive" or "negative". Good luck with that. They can't even map input objects in the training data to their actual source correctly or consistently.

It's absolutely possible, but pretty much anything that adds more overhead per each individual input in the training data is going to be too costly for any of them to try and pursue.

O(n) isn't bad, but when your n is as absurdly big as the training corpuses these things use, that has big effects. And there's no telling if it would actually only be an O(n) cost.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

On top of that, I personally set my default youtube app to be newpipe, so if I'm just casually browsing lemmy or elsewhere I can click a youtube link and figure out what it is, even watch it if I want, without it effecting my normal account and watch history.

If I like the video and want more like it, I'll share to the Youtube (Revanced) app and finish it there.

Literally illegal. As long as you can get a few other people to raise a stink with you, they can't do shit.

It can be fun to test just how mandatory these sorts of things are too. Playing dumb/forgetful can be fun and surprisingly effective. "Oh, I had to run out for lunch, I'm sorry. Oh god, it's been two weeks? I've been meaning to pack but I just can't find the time in the morning. Well, I'll take care of it now then!" (during paid time)

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Right?

Beyond that, I honestly associate feeling like you're going to throw up a little with relief. Most of the time once you do, you're good. Manually trigger your gag reflex and move on with shit. Even if it's a serious "evacuate your entire stomach contents" level of multi-throwup, your stomach isn't infinite.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago

In college I always named my router Skynet.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How am I supposed to find a cop to fuck on such short notice?

I don't know what to tell you beyond what I've already said.

I'm not denying that it's a serious goddamn problem. I have acknowledged that in every single comment I've made about this. Please stop insisting that I'm saying otherwise.

Once again, I am only saying that despite the high numbers, it is not just some ever present part of life over here to the degree that every American, or even a majority, has experienced gun violence. Everyone from the outside seems to think that's true, but it's insanely, laughably not. The quite overwhelming majority of Americans have not experienced gun violence, and won't within their lifetime.

Our population number is roughly equivalent to 3/4 of the entire European Union's combined population. Any of our numbers relating to people are going to look high unless you bear that in mind.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago

!NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.works

!NonCredibleDefense@piefed.social

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 days ago

Jesus. I don't think an adblocker would help if she couldn't manage the fucking volume buttons.

Lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink and all that.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think they still have something like at least 3 more major builds/feature goals currently planned. One is actual human NPCs, which the animal AI is a beginning step towards. They also want to do a lot more psuedo-random storytelling with houses and NPCs. They already have some, but they want to expand it quite a lot.

They've said that the "official release" will only be when they've added everything they want out of the game, so don't wait to buy it as it is absolutely a complete game as is. Could be another decade before they're done, lol. They just want to add so much more that they aren't comfortable calling it done yet.

This is a bot that reposts posts from HackerNews. It's just going to use whatever the original submission there used.

But thanks for saving me a few keystrokes with that link!

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, hence why I didn't say anything to counter anything else, or that it was a good place to visit anytime soon.

Got any other mindblowing facts for us?

 

Honestly? That's rookie numbers.

 

Definitely a repost, but it fits the season

1
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/parenting@lemmy.world
 

My daughter is a little over two, and through well meaning family and friends we have more toys than we know what to do with.

My wife keeps buying what are essentially (fancy looking) big boxes and just dumping everything in them. Love my wife, but that's not working, it's just hiding some of the mess in a box.

We end up with these hardly ever opened boxes full of unorganized piles of toys that we end up having to dig through to find anything specific, and the toys that my daughter is actively using just end up scattered around the floor so they don't disappear into the box dimension.

Every once in a while my daughter opens and digs through the boxes and dumps half the contents on the floor anyway (not like she can see specific things to grab what she wants) and then we just kind of arbitrarily choose some of it to put back in the box and a new combination of mess to leave out.

Unfortunately we have another baby on the way, so I'm probably not getting my wife to let us toss any of it right now.

I'm leaning towards cubby shelves with individual bins for different "types" of toys like her daycare does, but I wanted to hear what strategies other parents tried, and what has and hasn't worked.

 

collapsed inline media

Came like this, they absolutely knew:

collapsed inline media

view more: next ›