AnyOldName3

It'll be maintained for a while, so we might get to 3.14.15 or 3.14.16, which will be a better approximation and better because of more bugfixes.

The original study was doctored, but plenty of others with similar results weren't.

It tends to attract negative attention if you admit there's a civil war going on.

Drugs like Lecanemab don't help in that they don't reverse the progression of symptoms, but they do help in that they slow down the progression of symptoms. You'd expect someone who was given the drug for a few months to have more of their cognative ability left than someone who hadn't had it, but they'd both be much worse than they were at the start.

Someone already pointed that out, so I edited the post with strikethrough hours before you replied.

I do not - I've heard it so many times from so many places that I didn't bother checking it before repeating it, but it looks like it was wrong.

A total absense of tech would be bad for a washing machine. With a really simple conductivity sensor (basically just two electrodes on the sides of a plastic pipe) and an opacity sensor (an IR LED and an LDR on opposite sides of a clear pipe), you can measure how much stuff is dissolved in water and how much insoluable stuff is suspended. That then means that you can keep circulating the soapy water until it stops getting dirtier, then keep rinsing it out until it stops getting cleaner, which then means you can have the cycle times adjust themselves to how soiled the load is, instead of just making them as long as the worst case scenario might require and wasting energy, water, and time on an average load.

~~Miele was sold to a private equity firm and they've been reputation-fracking, so their recent stuff is supposed to be pretty mediocre but priced as if it's top-end.~~

It's nitpicking and also not quite right. Stock of a corportation is shares, whether or not they're publicly traded. It becomes plural when it's shares of multiple corporation.

However, LLCs aren't corporations at all (the C is Company), and in the US, stock is specifically of corporations. I'm in the UK, where the equivalent to an LLC's shares are still considered stock, and I've been googling whether private corporations have stock in the US, which they do, so the confusion's been that the public/private distinction isn't the important one and I've been arguing the definition of a word that's defined differently in the relevant country.

As I said, he also owns a billion dollars worth of superyatchts for personal use in addition to the one(s) nominally for marine research.

The billion dollars in superyatchts is just the personally-owned luxury kind that billionaries like to hoard, not marine research boats that he has funded. Him giving away some of his money doesn't mean that he's not also frivilously spent more money than most people could hope to see in a lifetime.

Fundamentally, I don't think we're going to agree here, as I fundamentally believe that there's an amount of money beyond which there are no ethical grounds for keeping it, and it's much lower than $11 billion. Newell has kept money above that threshold instead of giving everything he made beyond that threshold away (even illiquid stuff like part of his stake in Valve could, in principle, be given to a charity so the profit from Steam went straight into the charity), and I and plenty of other people would see that as greedy. Others might say that the fact that he's given anything away that he wasn't legally required to means that he's not greedy. These are subjective ethical opinions, so even though they can't be reconciled, it's not a big deal. Different people think different things are wrong.

The reason I've been replying at all is that some of the things you've stated to be facts are untrue, not that I'm trying to convince you that all billionaires are unethical.

Which makes his platform more popular. And in turn brings him even more cash to buy more yachts.

Realising that ratfucking your customers and suppliers at every opportunity makes them less willing to do business with you in the future, and therefore you'll potentially make more money by not doing that, so then not doing that, is exactly what a greedy person would do if they weren't also a moron. Gabe Newell is certainly not a moron. Lots of other billionaires are, or have other empathy-limiting conditions that mean they don't realise people won't want to do repeat business with them if they got screwed over the last time.

There's obviously a majority of billionaires that are much less ethical than Newell, but one superyatcht ought to be enough for anyone, and anyone buying a second one instead of putting the money directly to good causes is not benevolent.