this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
108 points (98.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41937 readers
660 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It has been the sensible order of choosing the source account then choosing the destination account. Now they’ve switched it to where you have to first choose the destination account then choose the source account.

I understand this shouldn’t be a big deal but my brain just absolutely rejects it and even knowing full well they’ve made the change on several occasions I’ve moved money the wrong way. Sometimes without even realizing it for days.

I don’t think this is simply a muscle memory thing that I’ll eventually get used to; I feel like it’s fundamentally nonsensical and I’m curious if it’s just me. Or am I just being a stubborn old man stuck in his ways?

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 33 points 1 day ago

Choosing the source then the destination is the correct order. The money moves from X to Y, of course you should choose X first and then Y. Destination then source feels inherently wrong to me too

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Both orders make sense, although switching the order is stupid.

Let me guess, the labels aren't extremely obvious either are they?

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess I’m just stuck in a physical mindset where you have to get the thing first before you can take it to where it goes.

The problem isn't really the labeling because when they show my list of accounts I’m just focused on finding the one I want to move from. Im not even looking at the surrounding text.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Did they just make the page look basically the same, but reverse the order? If so, then that's on them because of shitty UI planning. Making such a drastic change should come with an equally drastic visual layout change to disrupt the automatic mental flow that goes with muscle memory.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

No, in their defense it was part of a whole site redesign. This is part of why I think it’s more than just muscle memory for me though.

[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 3 points 22 hours ago

I feel you could choose another metaphor though, and it would make sense.

Like, when you go to a shop to buy something or buy something online, you have already chosen the destination. Then you decide how you pay, choosing the source.

To me both make sense equally.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago

They should display all your accounts as a word cloud and have you draw a line (directional arrow) from the source to the destination. Yes, using your finger (on a touchscreen) or the mouse.

#shittyuiideas

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

My bank did the same and I totally moved money the wrong way and fucked up and over drafted.

Luckily I don't get overdraft fees with my bank. But who the fuck designed putting destination first after years of it being second?

[–] __siru__@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 19 hours ago

Maybe to get a bunch of people to overdraft and then ahve to pay overdraft fees?

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Source then Destination is the usual convention in my mind. I probably wouldn't make a mistake either way because I'm the type to punch shit into my calculator 3 times to make sure.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

How much a nerd are you? Not in the insulting way though. Could use something like Greasemonkey to rearrange the elements after page load.

For many reasons, I am not recommending that you do so but it is a possibility.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Could be in an app and then that wouldn't work.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

This statement summarizes many of the problems with my modern life.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

True, but you know what could be even worse? The app might just be a wrapper to display a web page that you otherwise cannot access.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, so ... This statement summarizes many of the problems with my modern life.

edit: Also, I like your username. It makes me think of both Discworld and Adventure Time, two things that serve to partially counter the depressing nature of this conversation.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, I am pondering trying to take over the world!

... I'm too tired to actually be funny/relevant, but I appreciate your engagement.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Ook.

(No worries, be funny at your own pace)

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

be funny at your own pace

Taking this as a kind comment, this is probably the ... Third nicest thing anyone has ever said to me. Maybe fourth. Thanks.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

There’s an app for that,

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly, picking the destination first makes more sense.

But the primary law of UX is you don't change shit up on people. I'd have taken a stand if I was on that team

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Curious why you think destination first makes more sense.

I just can’t get over the idea that when you move a thing to a different place, you go to where the thing is first so you can take it to the new place.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sure... If I want $300 in an account, that's my goal. I don't want to decrease another account by that amount

So my goal is to move X money into Y account, or maybe all but X money into Y account

The second half is where it comes from. It's not the goal, it's the means

But again as I said, flipping this is a worse solution than either direction

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

You must be an electrical engineer or something, since you're apparently so used to thinking about flows backwards.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seems a convoluted way of looking at it to me, but i guess it's just another case of different strokes for different folks.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, I do this professionally, I took courses that break down what makes something feel intuitive

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't doubt that, but courses are selected/designed by their teachers - who likely select what fits their pre-existing biases. Virtually nothing humans do comes out without biases affecting things, which is what makes the "reproducibility" of studies such an important part of science - and even those reproductions need to be done numerous times by varying parties for the results to truly start to become trustworthy.

In short: there's no pleasing everybody, but if you're going to try then you must allow for differences in views and modus operandi.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago

You realize this is actually a field of study? Like, this isn't a particularly soft science... Companies have done massive A/B campaigns and written papers on it, universities do studies on it... It's not just opinion

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

When you pay a bill, do you select who you're paying then the amount from whichever account, or do you select the amount from an account and then select the company you're paying?

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you think of it in physical terms , when you move something you have to grab it from its source then go to the destination.

Like even moving money to pay for something, you take out of your wallet and hand to the cashier.

Even computer filesystem management is: copy source destination, move source destination

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It depends on how you look at it, and how it's presented

You don't fill a hole by grabbing dirt and finding a hole, you realize you need to fill a hole, and then you grab/buy materials to fill it in with.

It's just a matter of approach. You can frame it in either direction

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago)

You still have to move dirt from source to destination, especially if there are multiple holes. But yeah maybe they should have a UI toggle

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Can also think like this, "I have an invoice that I need to pay. So I need to pay to there, let me figure out where to get the money from", i.e. impetus/problem-based thinking instead of process-based thinking.

The process is move X to Y, but the need to get something to Y actually came first, like Y is an invoice, or an account that is overdrawn, or whatever. Y created the "problem" initially, and then moving from X is the "solution".

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

This is in a personal bank account though not inter company business