Azzu

There's a difference though between counteracting the spread of a disease and looking at porn...

Probably a new set of masts & sails for their boat.

Or a new oil pumping station.

Or maybe a new truck.

stfu

;)

Stop having a goal with women specifically. You talking about experience and success with women is literally the total opposite of what makes sense.

Just have fun with a person. You have had fun interacting with people before, right? Just do that. The literal only difference is that you can sprinkle in some sexual innuendos or some shit, if you think of it. If not, also fine. Then go home and resume what you always do. Repeat.

If while doing this you ever notice some sexual tension, just do something sexual. Touch them. Or tell them you find them attractive. Or ask to kiss them. Whatever, it literally doesn't matter. If they don't like it, you'll likely notice because they tell you and then you can do something different. If they like it, you'll also likely notice, and continue escalating from there. Touching platonic -> kissing -> making out hair/neck/back-> touching sexually titties/butt -> touching pussy. Natural progression.

If you notice something afterwards, while thinking about it (like someone giving you obvious signals that you completely missed), if you can, just respond to the signal as soon as you notice, don't think "now it's too late". In fact, it's never to late until you tried it and it didn't work.

But yeah, I can't stress this enough. The most important thing is to not expect anything. In fact, maybe you'll never have sexual contact again. It's best if you're content with nothing but masturbating for the rest of your life.

No, only those who imprison people for peaceful protest.

I mean you can just ventilate whenever you spill something.

The larger problem would be the entire water-based ecosystem.

There's constant mentions about "I read your report", so yes, I assume they communicate most routine things by mail.

Binding the interface is definitely the recommended way to go about it, it was in some manual when I first informed myself about torrenting. But it's not required and easy to miss if you don't consume correct resources, it's not obvious.

They really should have robbed him for $1 less.

There is no other reason to do it like this in a Lemmy post other than you want to publicly discredit the devs somehow. This is quite obviously a mistake and not a way to harvest admin passwords. Just fixing it and not trying to stir up shit would have been the right thing to do.

OP managed to find the bug. He knows how to fix it. Obviously he'd know how to make an issue about it, and probably even know how to contribute his fix that he already made in the official way to the open source project.

You do not possess these skills so obviously you're not the one who should make the issue.

Yet he decided to somehow create this public post highlighting something that could be sketchy to try to publicly discredit the devs. There is no other reason to do it like this.

Why make a Lemmy post about this and not just a GitHub issue?