this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
730 points (95.1% liked)

Political Memes

9309 readers
2828 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

such a funny time for this discourse again ☕

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pibfyhd7g57gd5u64f@piefed.social 127 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Actual leftists have always been pro gun though...

[–] Resplendent606@piefed.social 108 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Yes, Karl Marx wrote:

"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary."

"To be able forcefully and threateningly to oppose this party [bourgeois], the workers must be armed and organized."

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Followed shortly after by:

The former Soviet Union established gun control in 1929 and as a result, Stalin’s government killed 40 million Soviets. This is a clear example of how gun control can be used to oppress a population and take away their right to self-defense.

https://www.dictatorbaron.com/did-joseph-stalin-ban-guns/

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 day ago

And then they call everyone else revisionist

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is going over a lot better than when I said it, in progressivepolitics@lemmy.world no less. What a difference a month makes these days, I suppose.

https://sh.itjust.works/comment/19935457

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago

I would fuck with that sub Lemmy. I got into an argument and they deleted every single comment I made in another separate post, even though it was at +14. Idk if they're tankies or punks, but they both quacking to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like, I'm all for gun laws. But unfortunately a lot of crazy shit is legal, and a lot of people are crazy.

Prepare for the world you live in, not what you think it should be like.

[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 19 points 1 day ago

Prepare for the world you live in, not what you think it should be like.

That is an amazing way of wording a sentiment I've had for a long time

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 72 points 1 day ago (3 children)

America is well past the point where any of this is going to end without gunfire. So yeah. Leftists, it's time to admit that MAGA doesn't give a shit about your "protests" or your "letters to your representative". Protests only work if the person you're protesting gives a shit what you think.

It's time to get your guns. Mussolini didn't end up hanging upside down in an Italian town square because of protests.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Mussolini didn’t end up hanging upside down in an Italian town square because of protests.

While you're right that the people who killed Mussolini were armed dissidents, it's worth remembering that he was allowed to be taken after being deposed after a vote of no confidence from the fascist government of Italy after they got their shit kicked in a few times militarily, and it was the King who removed and presumably arrested him before the citizens did their thing.

And also, the Allies were plowing a path of destruction towards Italy.

Moral of the story: no great story is as simple as we need it to be. There is still politics, there are still decisions by the ruling class that allow the next steps to happen and that ruling class can have their will bent. We still need to be involved in the political system, armed mobs cause as much harm as good even in the best of circumstances, so we want to avoid that if possible, but we need to also have that force behind us or the politics won't work.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The calm that washes over me when I see people just casually talking sense on the internet

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Ikr it's the gentle reassurance that nuance and substance are still out there.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To rephrase this line

Protests only work if the person you're protesting gives a shit what you think.

Protests only work when you directly affect their vested interests. They don't care about you or what you think. Period. Yet, they do care about something.

Organize. Find out what those vested interests are. Hold them hostage. Create the credible threat that if they do not start representing our interests, as is their assumed role of the position they have been appointed to, then we will royally fuck it up and hit them where it hurts.

Then, it doesn't matter if they care what we think, we have established our authority and made it known that it will be enforced with immediate consequences. If they want their authority as a government official then they will respect our authority as their constituency or else.

Most of all, be prepared for them to retaliate and defend their interests. To deter us and threaten us to stand down. These are the times in history where we can't back down. We cannot give in to them just to save our own skin when it comes at the cost of, if allowed to continue, the skins of millions of others under the boot of their oppression.

We fight and stand our ground knowing that we may possibly die, but also possibly survive and save millions of lives, or we do nothing, let millions fall to their atrocities, until they finally turn their sights on us and we die with regret that we didn't even attempt to stop them.

They can't do this without us so, if they want to go this route, we need to be ready to sink the whole goddamn ship so they don't get their cake and eat it too. Mutually assured destruction is not just a nuclear deterrent. The best part is, us workers can rebuild. We built this all to begin with. The owning class assholes, if they get rid of us, will live out their final moments in a burned out husk surrounded by resources with no ability to use them. They will be Kings of nothing, to die of thirst surrounded by water with nothing but their imaginary wealth to keep them company.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] user_name@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (7 children)

“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (16 children)

If you go far enough left, you get your guns back.

Sick of the constant, "Where my 2A people at?!" around here. I am right fucking here, but I'm not in much of a position to mount a personal assault on Washington DC. All I can reasonably do is defend my immigrant wife and our home if it comes to that.

FFS, some of these people even question self-defense. "They'll just kill you, moron!" Yeah, well that was on the table anyway.

And if any gun-grabbers think the cops and ICE and politicians are fascist enough as-is, imagine how they would be acting if they could kick down doors with full impunity and zero fear. Yeah, the local cops could get a squad of 20 and take this house apart. But somebody's getting hurt. I guarantee it.

Here's an interesting thought, let's see how this plays out. Florida is red enough ATM, governor and state Congress. Why haven't they passed open-carry legislation? Why isn't it even under discussion? Think they'll make it happen?

I'll give you three guesses, but you're only going to need one. Fuck no they will not legislate open carry because men like me will be at every protest with an AR-15 on my shoulder and a Colt .45 in my belt.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's honestly crazy that we have the "right" to bear arms and the "right" to protest, but half the country cannot protest while bearing arms. Meanwhile, police are shooting people's eyes out and trampling them with horses.

load more comments (1 replies)

I tried several times in the last few days to articulate the points you're making. well said

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And if any gun-grabbers think the cops and ICE and politicians are fascist enough as-is, imagine how they would be acting if they could kick down doors with full impunity and zero fear. Yeah, the local cops could get a squad of 20 and take this house apart. But somebody's getting hurt. I guarantee it.

And there's the real case for private ownership.

If you have the choice of being disappeared and killed...or being disappeared and killed while taking a few of them with you, definitely choose the latter.

It won't help you, but if you do it, your neighbor does it, and the next 10, 20...50 people do it, eventually two things are going to happen: if it's local forces, they're gonna start needing help, and if it's not local, it forces those powers into a more difficult decision of having to either get more overt with their fascism or backing off. It's not ideal but that's pretty much the options you have.

If they want to do all the shitty fascist things, don't let them do it easily and for free. The higher ups might not care, but that local cop in the red hat might start to think twice when "his" government keeps asking him to haul away people, and each time, another of his friends goes down. If not from a place of shifting world view, then maybe from self preservation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

Quickest way for trump to take away everyone’s guns is for people he doesn’t like to arm up. Libs, minorities, etc. incidentally - trump is the only president who has suggested guns be taken away. Not even the snowflake republicans’ deepest fears and hatred of the Democratic presidents was ever validated by one of them saying guns should be taken away like trump.

“I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida … to go to court would have taken a long time,” Trump said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety and gun violence.

“Take the guns first, go through due process second,” Trump said.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Turns out they hate women more than they love guns.

collapsed inline media

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago

I think this episode plot of Bojack is one of the most bitingly effective takedowns of US culture I have seen, these words live rentfree in my head as a future epitaph to put on the gravestone of the US.

Turns out they hated women more than they loved guns.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Proceeds to ban all guns Turns out America hates women more than it loves guns.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Mag dumping each other for fun and profit.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Ironically, leftists are more in line with the constitution with our reasoning around gun ownership. In my book, anyone who isn't happy with the lax state of gun laws is equally an ally and we shouldn't draw lines in the sand for no reason. You can both own a gun and want it to be harder for people who shouldn't get them to get them, it's almost as silly as the "you criticize society and yet you participate in society" argument.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ssroxnak@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Leftists have always been pro gun. There's just not that many leftists. It's the Democrats and neoliberals who think only Trump and his government should have guns.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not American, but I consider myself left wing, and I am pro gun but I am also pro gun control. I don't think outright banning them is a solution but I also don't think letting them out in the world unchecked is a good idea either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I thought leftists are always pro-gun, while its the liberals (which includes those progressives in the US Democratic party) are always against guns.

I always felt like a minority in politics. I grew more and more supportative of egalitarian policies as a I grew older, coming to that conclusion from both logics (I wouldn't want to be treated that way), and also from experience as a racial minority.

But I've literally always been pro-gun since the moment the gun topic came up in school.

Which just leaves me in a very confused position when I learned that out of the two big parties (those that can actually win an election), the party I agree more with opposes guns. I just had a mini-identity crisis.

So while I do vote for democrats, I do so begrudgingly, because there is just no viable left-of-center pro-gun party. Every time they say "gun control" on an election year, I just facepalm, like c'mon just drop the issue from the party platform and win a lot more elections, the time to debate guns was 1789, now its kinda too late, cats out of the bag.

"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary"

-Karl Marx

I disagree with Stalinism and Maoism, but Marx had great ideas, but sadly people just did a horrible interpretation/implementations of it and used communist/socialist aesthetics to justify their authoritatianism and never actually doing any real egalitarian stuff.

[–] Seefoo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Being pro gun, doesn't have to mean you're against sensible gun laws though

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

So far, what democrats propose aren't really sensible.

They are giving authority to police to dictate who can or cannot obtain a gun permit.

Like wtf, fuck the police, I don't trust them with shit.

Give that power to like, idk, some sort of jury and maybe we'll talk about gun control. But I ain't trusting cops with the discretion to hand out gun permits. They'll give it to a white young-adult that's racist as fuck and threatened people, but will simultaneously refuse to give a permit to a black store owner seeking for a gun to defend against a potential white mob trying to attack his store.

Before 2022, most Democratic jurisdictions operate under "May-Issue" laws, meaning, cops had broad discretion on whether to issue a permit or not, but then the supreme court, ironically its the 6 fascist-alligned judges, struck it down and the whole US is now under "Shall-Issue" laws, which means, cops cannot deny a permit if the background check comes clean, so no more denying guns to non-whites and using "he looks suspicious" as a reason.

Background checks? Yea fine.

Manatory gun safety training? Sure.

Permits? Ummm only if its a neutral nonpolitical jury/citizen's commission or something like that. Cuz otherwise nope, can't trust cops with the discretion.

Gun Registry? Don't give it to the government. An independent citizen's commission should maintain the registry, only accessible to investigators if there's probable cause and a warrant should be required.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you talking about people in the USA or people elsewhere in the world? The USA is always "special" when it comes to matters like this.

Definitely just the USA. I mentioned earlier that I really respect NZ deciding to disarm after their last public shooting. That's something that could really happen when corruption is that low and people are educated and healthy.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (14 children)

It's definitely not just an American thing.

"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." -Karl Marx

America does have a "unique" culture around guns, but that's not all that prevalent on the left. What's driving interest in guns is the sad fact that we might need to use them.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago

Look how black panthers existence changed many laws in carry permits, and you understand why both sides needs to be pro-guns

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because fascism is here and guns are a requirement now if we don't want to live in an authoritarian future.

I've been anti-gun my whole life. That's because I had some faith that our society was intelligent enough that we could create a less violent nation that respects democracy and votes our way into a better future.

Reality Check: That isn't our society.

Guns may not save us from authoritarianism, but not having them guarantees it. Wish it wasn't so, but it is.

If this train keeps derailing, they will end up coming for you. That's how fascism works. You want a way to defend yourself or not?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There’s no place in a civilised democratic society for people to be walking around with guns. America, on the other hand…

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In a civilised society, you don't fear every random passerby will try to kill you, so it is irrelevant what they are carrying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Anti-gun sentiment doesn't belong in a country where there are more firearms than people.

It's always been idiocy. Stupid democrats saying stupid things because they know their idiot followers will lap it up. It's been bullshit the entire time.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Been around guns my whole life. Shot them, loaded them, cleaned them, but IV never owned one myself. Mostly for a lack of wanting. But now seems a good time to have my own for better or worse.

Girlfriend really don't want me to have it tho

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Super unrelated but anyone ever hear the song John Brown's Body? Lovely ditty!

load more comments
view more: next ›