this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
571 points (99.1% liked)

News

31914 readers
3433 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors have failed to obtain a felony indictment against a man who was seen on camera hurling a sandwich at a federal law enforcement official in the nation’s capital, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.

Sean Charles Dunn was arrested on an assault charge after he threw a sub-style sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection agent. A video of the incident went viral, and shortly after he was fired from the Justice Department, where he worked as an international affairs specialist in the department’s criminal division.

The case is one of the examples of the legal pushback to President Donald Trump’s law enforcement surge in Washington that has led to more than 1,000 arrests. It is highly unusual for grand jurors to refuse to return an indictment, and it was once said that prosecutors could persuade a grand jury to “indict a ham sandwich.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 144 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"public safety operation"

Journalists are going to sanitize their own executions. Wish we had a real Fourth Estate that would challenge political branding rather than stenograph it.

[–] griff@lemmings.world 24 points 2 days ago

special public safety operation!

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago

Reuters just did that.

IDF bombed a reuters journalist, but they reported what IDF said as the headline, claiming their target was a Hamas camera... It was their camera.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago

Journalists are going to sanitize their own executions.

Already happening in Gaza

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is why one of their major targets is due process.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 57 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Fucking maddening how so many Latinos voted for Trump because "they got in the right way", not realising that they'd end up getting randomly stopped and deported "because they fit the profile".

It never pays to throw in your lot with white supremicists, they'll always turn on you.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I mean.....I don't think you can say they'll turn on you. That implies they supported you at one point.

White supremicists have ALWAYS been against you, if you're not also white, male, and a white supremicist.

Just because you support them, does not mean they support you. To modify a George Carlin quote:

"It's a big club, and you ~~ain't in it~~ don't want to be in it."

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They'll make temporary alliances if it furthers their goals. That's why they like Israel while they're actually antisemites, because that way you can go after Muslims more easily.

A big part of it is obviously the dog shit messaging from the Democrats. They don't want to be seen as critical of the police, so I haven't seen anyone mention the reality of racist cops conducting traffic stops based on racial profiling leading to the current situation, and the assumption they had of Latinos being one singular voting block that is always in favour of open borders, instead of a whole bunch of different groups from different countries with an immigration background that ranges from recent arrivals to people that have lived in the same place for centuries and have actually had the US illegally annex them.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They'll make temporary alliances if it furthers their goals. That's why they like Israel while they're actually antisemites, because that way you can go after Muslims more easily.

They like Israel because Revelations says the Jews returning to the Holy Land is a precondition for Armageddon and they think they're gonna get Raptured. It's literally a delusional death cult.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 80 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Everyone finishes watching the video.

Prosecutor: So, you can clearly see the assault take place. Does everyone agree?

Jurors: I didn't see anything. Did you guys see anything? Nope. Not a thing. Who wants a sandwich?

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'd like a sandwich, but I didn't see any laws broken

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

All I saw was a hero.

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Well clearly the sandwich is guilty of public indecency, you can see its condiments.

Also the ICE agents are disturbing the peace.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This just in: Grand Jury fails to indict a ham sandwich.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They didn't fail. They did their job.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Agreed, they did to their jobs, it's just a joke on the old saying that "a Grand Jury could indict a ham sandwich."

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Ham sandwich ✔
Sub sandwich ✖

We need more data to determine exactly which kinds of sandwiches are indictable. Throw more!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

shortly after he was fired from the Justice Department, where he worked as an international affairs specialist in the department’s criminal division

The cop, who investigates cops, was so pissed off that he just threw the first thing he could get a hold of...

I can't even come up with a proper analogy for how far off the rails this is.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago

It's good to know there might be some people like that still in there...

If you've seen the video, you'd see that this man was pissed. Full of righteous anger... And everyone else on the street, including the people filming, just thought it was funny. Just fucking clueless.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The cop, who investigates cops

That's internal affairs. Your quote says international affairs.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whoops... You're right.

I'm using the fact that I've been awake for 20 hours as an excuse for my lack of reading abilities.

I shall leave my mistake there to remind me to go to sleep. (After Doom scrolling for a few hours...)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Last time I reacted to this Pirro quote by saying it was indeed very funny:

“He thought it was funny,” Ms. Pirro said of the defendant in a video posted online. “Well, he doesn’t think it’s funny today, because we charged with him with a felony.”

I just want to say, it has gone up a level to "hilarious" now that they can't even get a grand jury on their side

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And there's that saying that a grand jury will indict a ham sandwich.... oh the irony.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was their mistake, they should have charged the sandwich.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck AP for calling this a “public safety operation”. That is absolutely not a neutral way to report this. Fascist loving bootlickers. AP is a right wing rag.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 32 points 2 days ago

Bwahahaha. Did the officer even say thank you for the sandwich?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 days ago

"Public safety operation."

Way to buy into the bullshit, there, AP.

[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (9 children)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was long, but the meating went well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 25 points 2 days ago

Prosecutors fail to indict sandwich thrower in Trump's Washington public safety operation

Besides the good news in the story, can we just take a moment to appreciate the absurdity of the title itself? I love it

[–] axus@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Mild doxx, I've served on a DC Grand Jury before. You're commuting to the courthouse for 3 weeks minimum, though only 3 days a week. Most of the people are not getting compensated from their job to be there, just some money for the Metro.

The standard of evidence to indict is much lower, basically "it's believable that the accused could be guilty of the charges". Caught on camera is quite believable, the key here is "the charges". If the charges don't fit the crime, a jury that's paying attention wouldn't indict . I'm 80% sure indictment is a majority vote, didn't have to be unanimous.

Generally the prosecution is presenting evidence and calling law enforcement officers to testify, the defendant sending a lawyer is optional (expensive). You get a mostly one-sided argument, but these are all people who live in DC; some well off but most kinda poor. It's DC so both categories do not like Trump. If they believe somebody is committing crimes in DC they'll happily indict; but most cases indict, it feels good to cancel the case when someone doesn't deserve it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

This dude, himself, worked at the Justice Department. I'm sure he was able to get some very good representation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is all hilarious of course, but that sandwich thrower would probably be dead if he wasn’t white.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're right for now. I think they'll stop caring by Christmas, as long as they oppose the administration, they're a threat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago
[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Federal Prosecutors used Felony Indictment against sandwich tosser.

It's not very effective...

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Its almost as if the majority of us have decided the current trumpism is wrong. Almost.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

We need to start doing a trump hand check. Well maybe, it'll probably just give us too much hope.

On Tuesday, YouTuber Keith Edwards — a former staffer for the anti-Trump Lincoln Project — posted a side-by-side comparison of Trump’s hand during a Monday event and the hand of the late Queen Elizabeth II during an audience with then-prime minister Liz Truss.

Edwards noted that the photograph of the late Queen with Truss was taken just two days before she passed, ending more than 70 years on the British throne.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/gavin-newsom-trump-hand-bruise-b2815067.html

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago

You're playing with my emotions.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Then you get JD Vance, who's even more in the pocket of right-wing think tanks and billionaires. If there's a Vance presidency, It'll pretty much be run by people like Thiel, Yarvin and Ellison.

Until congress fixes the damage done by Citizens United, everything else is just going to be a bandage. Maybe if the FPTP voting system and the electoral college go away, but that's even harder to do. I don't think America needs a good or strong president. It needs congress to do its job by reigning in the two other branches that have gone off the rails, but it's also controlled by openly corrupt right-wing representatives.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

May the sandwich of justice strike again!

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Subway...Subhow...

[–] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 14 points 1 day ago (9 children)

He's being charged with Assault With a Deli Weapon.

Credit: Jimmy Dore

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

In semi-related news, the DC spitter had charges reduced to misdemeanors after 3 different grand juries returned no true bill. In federal court, there is a 30 day deadline after arrest to secure an indictment or your felony charges get dismissed.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Lotta great sub sandwich places in Chicago

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is going to be framed as liberal juries nullifying just to be mean to poor old President Trump.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Suck the footlong fascists.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›