this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
771 points (99.1% liked)

politics

22085 readers
4052 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz Tim Walz warns that Trump may soon arrest political opponents and potentially groom one of his sons, likely Donald Jr., as a successor.

"It's going to get very dark," Walz told CNN, citing Trump's defiance of a judge's order on Venezuelan migrants and calls to impeach a federal judge as evidence of authoritarian tendencies.

He expressed concern that Democratic leaders underestimate Trump’s authoritarianism and public frustration with both parties.

Walz criticized Schumer’s handling of the GOP spending bill and questioned how Democrats will rebuild institutions damaged by Trump.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 260 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jesus maybe they shouldn't have fucking muzzled this guy during the election.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It became pretty clear, pretty quickly, that he was by far the more compelling candidate for president. If the Dems would put aside their obssession with only offering presidential nominations to minorities and women, they could do a lot more good for those constituencies by getting elected over empty election martyrdom. They need to be reminded that the first rule of politics is "Get Elected," not making futile, empty gestures of being "first."

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The problem is not the minority or gender association, it's the platform. People said a black man couldn't win the presidency until Obama ran as a progressive and won handily. I don't give two shits that Kamala Harris wasn't white or a man. Biden was both of those things and I didn't like him any better. I still voted for both of them because even a wet dog turd is better than Trump, but we need people to get excited about an alternative, not just vote against Trump.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Yeah this is the real problem - the Dems care WAY too much about seniority and 'whose turn it is'. They care more about that than electability or messaging or, god forbid, formulating a platform that actually speaks to the average American that would inform all of the above.

On voting day I'm going to hold my nose and vote for anyone that isn't a fascist criminal. But I promised my leftist friends that the rest of the time I'm going to do what I can to push the Democratic party to actually represent us, and that's what I intend to do.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wouldn't so much blame Democrats as a whole, but definitely Biden. He dropped out late and then "crowned" his successor. I didn't mind her all that much, compared to the orange nightmare, but I was still pretty pissed the Democrats essentially bypassed a democratic process of choosing a nominee.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I didn't mind it too much (the naming Kamela part - Biden staying in the race for so long with a dead campaign was a travesty). As Vice President she was already voted by the American people to be his successor, so making her the nominee was just asking the public if that was still the case. With so little time before the election, avoiding factionalizing the Democratic party was important - people will eventually get over their candidate losing and vote for the winning nominee, but there wasn't time for a nomination and for those feelings to fade before November.

I only wish she'd kept the energy and progressive drive of the first few days of her candidacy rather than falling victim to the same advisors that ruined Hillary and Biden's runs. This election should have been an easy win for even the lamest Democratic candidate, but it seems Democrats learned nothing from Obama's success (well, unless you count "shut down progressives early before they gain momentum").

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 165 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Immigrants are being loaded onto planes and shipped off to places they probably won't return from - without having even been accused of a crime, much less tried in court. Supporters of the president don't care because they're immigrants.

Now swap "immigrants" with "jews", "planes" with "trains", and "president" with "chancellor", and what do you get?

[–] Houseman@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That prison in El Salvador is a damn death camp.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Actually, the supposed Venezuelan gang (assuming it really was and wasn't just some people who were inconvenient), why did they send them to El Salvador and not Venezuela?

[–] GrassCat@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the Salvadorian prison is profiteering from this.

[–] C45513@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so it's literally human trafficking then. add it to the list of US war crimes I guess

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

From what I've heard, none of them have been confirmed to be gang members, and around half have been confirmed to not be gang members.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In some cases, to places they've never even been to.

It's purposely cruel.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (5 children)

We know Tim. We know.

But hey, our representatives are voting as hard as they can, right? That'll show em!

[–] kriz@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's so frustrating. You don't have to warn anybody, it's already happening! You have to do something.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doing something requires courage, and the vast majority of our current Dems are feckless cowards. Most are content to hide behind their job descriptions and enjoy their free healthcare and when the time comes, deploy their golden parachutes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

Yeah, we know. But I don't think we're exactly representative of the average voter. The lack of politicians coming out and saying this shit is alarming, and we need more of it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Retropunk64@lemmy.world 53 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

If democrats are underestimating him then they're stupid as fuck.

[–] techclothes@lemmy.world 33 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

It really pisses me off they were sounding the alarms during the election. Then he was elected and the majority of them just go on as if nothing of not happened.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

It's almost as though they were never serious about stopping fascism and never will be.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 24 points 16 hours ago

Guess what. They are stupid as fuck.

[–] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There were warnings at least a year before the election, many people laid out what is to come, it was barely taken serious, mostly ignored. And even now the media and government types are doing mostly a half assed "we're stunned he's doing this, but oh well, another day another decree"

It is too late, there will come an indefinite next term of Trump's hegemony, and when he dies his son will take over as new/official king. He himself might not want to take up the title soon but when his next in line is ready it will start to be brandished about.

The writing is on the wall with how he is already tearing up any legal restrictions laid on him.

The current "proposals" for a 3rd term are only there to get people acquainted with it under the guise of "let him finish the job" but it will get hammered through, objections will not be tolerated.

[–] JT571024LF@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can't tell you how many times I was told I was being dramatic and/or crazy. All I have is a bunch of fuck you's for all the people who would not listen to me. I'm so angry seeing "in four years" statements when I know damn well there will be no more legit voting. I am still wanting to slap everyone for being so fucking dense to the reality. I don't think usa is worth saving at this point, everyone is just too fucking stupid and I'm tired of swimming upsteam.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Political opponents are already being targeted.

They're just going to ramp it up.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

An issue I see with US politics from the outside is the fact that when a party loses the candidate just disappears from the map and the party that's supposed to be the opposition to the one in power is now stuck without a leader. The Republicans changed that with Trump as he kept control over the party during Biden's tenure and that meant that the Republicans that got elected just got in the Democrats' way whenever Trump said something even if it contradicted their previous position...

The Democrats need to wake the fuck up and not wait until the last minute to choose who will be their next presidential candidate. They need someone in the driver's seat ASAP and having someone campaigning for the next four years (LIKE TRUMP DID!) would only increase their chances to make people realize how fucked up things are right now!

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 18 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (8 children)

I think the problem with this is, nobody really wanted Biden or Harris. They were just the best we had. Like, nobody is going to listen to Harris now. But people love Trump, so he doesn't have that issue.

Edit: The democratic party does not care what their voters want, they need only provide the lesser of two evils to get votes. They believe that so much, that Harris' entire campaign was to talk about what Trump was going to do rather than what she was going to do. "Look at all these things Trumps gonna do, at least I'm not him!"

Another edit: Indeed, as multiple of you have pointed out, "the best we had" was a poor choice of words. Hell, I think even Walz was a better choice, so it's not exactly like you need to go looking far for one.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 36 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

One of the first things the fascist playbook says to do is get rid of political opponents.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago

We need more people with platforms saying this shit.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Its crazy that the republicans even at this point is not impeaching him. He has definitively ignored a court order. The only lever left is impeachment to retain our system.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Its crazy that the republicans even at this point is not impeaching him.

Why? They don't give a shit about the laws. With Trump in power, they stay on his good side, they have run of the place.

The USA we all knew is now dead. There is no coming back from this. If you have money in US funds or US companies, move it. It won't be worth anything after civil war break out - and it will.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 30 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised to see political opponents falling from windows before the next midterms.

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Nah, unless some things change very quickly, he will want to make retaliation against famous political enemies very public

Falling out of windows will be reserved for lesser known journalists, citizens, and even Republican law makers that dare to speak out against any of his policies.

I imagine famous political enemies at best night experience something like Putin's wet dream from The 3rd empire novel:

"representatives of the American elite: President [George] Bush III and former presidents Bill Clinton, Bush Junior, and Hillary Clinton; current and former members of the cabinet, the House, and the Senate; bankers and industrialists; newspaper commentators and television anchors; famous attorneys and top models; pop singers and Hollywood actresses. All of them passed through Red Square in shackles and with nameplates around their necks. … The Russian government was letting its own citizens and the whole world know that Russia had fought with and vanquished not only the American army but the American civilization."

Here is a snapshot of an Atlantic article from a few years ago about the novel. It seems to quite literally be Putin's playbook sprinkled with some fanfiction about his deepest hopes and desires. The person that wrote the article is a professor in the U.S. that fled Russia and has been trying and failing to warn people about this book for years.

https://archive.is/CSBaa

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 23 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

There could be several people Trump has in mind for the first political enemy to be arrested, but my money would be on Anthony Fauci. They have been setting this guy up in a very elaborate way for years, but especially since last summer.

Below is a comment I made about the autopen pardon claim, but I'm just pasting it here so that more people can be aware of some facts before Trump starts making more bs claims to justify his bs policies:

Not sure if he has already said anything about the Fauci pardon, but almost certainly will be making the argument against him too.

I wrote about it a little in the post I made and plan to update with more information in a longer follow up post.

So Biden’s pardon to Fauci is backdated to 2014, the year the NIH issued pause on funding for gain of function (GOF) research. The pause was only meant to apply to research that increased the contagion or virulence of a pathogen with enhanced pandemic potential (ePPP).

From the time the notice was issued, many scientists were worried about the use of the term GOF because most virology and vaccine research involves what is by definition GOF research. Any modification of genetic material during an experiment could meet the definition of GOF. Whether it is traditional vaccine research where genetic alteration is used to increase yields for vaccine strains or even steps of genetic modification for mRNA vaccines which don’t require an inactive or weak pathogen to create a vaccine.

Anyway, this past summer during House Oversight COVID-19 Select Subcommitee Hearings into the NIH funding for the EcoHealth Alliance collaboration with Wuhan Institute of Virology, the subcommitee asked the deputy director of the NIH this question:

Rep Lesko: “Dr. Tabak, did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through EcoHealth?” Dr. Tabak: “It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research. If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did…the generic term is research that goes on in many, many labs around the country. It is not regulated. And the reason it’s not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody.” https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-nih-repeatedly-refutes-ecohealth-alliance-president-dr-peter-daszaks-testimony-tabak-testimony-reveals-federal-grant-procedures-in-need-of-serious-reform/

The Subcommitee claims this contradicts previous testimony given by Anthony Fauci. It seems pretty clear Fauci was referring to GOF as it was used in the 2014 NIH pause and Tabak was using it regarding the broad definition. However, the conclusion of many is that Fauci willingly misled the American public when he said the NIH does not support GOF research.

Biden has never acknowledged this is what the pardon was about, but it would be quite the coincidence if the 2014 backdate had nothing to do with this.

And of course the Heritage Foundation has jumped on to the we need to end dangerous GOF funding train https://www.heritage.org/public-health/commentary/president-trump-should-reinstate-president-obamas-moratorium-risky

Out of a concern for public safety of course.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We've all been understanding this even while Walz et al were talking about how they might run in a few years.

Only argument is I see no way trump trusts don jr with even being a figurehead.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

They're gonna put in Barron because he knows how to turn on a computer. That's a step of competency above his other sons. Also, they'll want the youngest one in for the longest-lived dictatorship.

Further, Barron has made inroads in the right wing podcast ecosystem. The other Trump boys are still living in the 90's, they'll want someone who understands the modern era and can influence it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vaguerant@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago

He prefers to groom Ivanka anyway.

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats won't do a thing. They are in on it. They have been ratcheting towards oligarchy little by little.

They need to be replaced.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Most of them, but there are ones like him who still have integrity. Don't toss them aside.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AOC and Bernie are on tour. Walz might be ok, but he’s still on probation until he shows true spine, not just very good rhetoric.

I would very much like to know of other Federal office holders we can count on. I am serious, not baitin’. Looking to find some hope and figure out who to boost or help.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if Walz will become the George Washington of America, while AOC and Bernie can be Founding Parents for other aspects of a reformed nation?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only solace is that the fuckers who are feeding us to the machine are the ones who are going to get minced first.

Spineless fucks.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's really crazy that they think capitulation will save them and we already have tons of examples of groups complying with this batshit administration and then immediately getting punished anyway.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is what happens when people refuse to learn about history. We are doomed to repeat the same mistakes, and instead of facing it head-on, people would rather ignore it or change it entirely.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›