this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
623 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

72235 readers
2890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PanaX@lemmy.world 255 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Based on that logic, ammunition and arms manufacturers should be held liable for damages as well.

[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 150 points 1 day ago

Yes, but that would mean that logic has any bearing on what the Supreme Court decides to do

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago

The US has a law to limit the liability of gun manufacturers.

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a U.S law, passed in 2005, that protects firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. Both arms manufacturers and dealers can still be held liable for damages resulting from defective products, breach of contract, criminal misconduct, and other actions for which they are directly responsible. However, they may be held liable for negligent entrustment if it is found that they had reason to believe a firearm was intended for use in a crime.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More like, if you steal something you are banned from using roads and sidewalks and doors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 210 points 1 day ago (13 children)

I'm not a judge, but isn't internet essentially a utility these days? Cutting someone off because of piracy seems like cutting off electricity or water because they did something illegal with it.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 139 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This would be the case had net neutrality not been killed off nearly a decade ago

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 134 points 1 day ago

Not even piracy. Accusations thereof.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 90 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure this supreme court would rule that people don't have a right to electricity, or even water. They'll probably be totally ok with people losing internet access as punishment for crossing media owners.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

or even water

Already did.

We never stopped the “lol treaties with Native American tribes don’t count” bullshit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 61 points 1 day ago

Pragmatically, yes. Legally, no. Progressives have been fighting for years to get internet classified as a utility in the US, and regressives and (ironically) internet companies have been fighting against that effort at every turn in the name of profit.

And now look how well that's turned out. Gee, if only some people had warned them that deregulation was a monkey's paw...

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They could even be totally innocent, the mere accusation is enough, wtf?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

USCIS can deport a non-citizen for accusations of drug use, including weed.

Let that sink in.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SillyDude@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Inb4 palantir cuts off your electric and water because you had 15% eye distraction during the mandatory 3hr nightly fox news viewing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago

accused piracy, too. Not proven. Not convicted. Just “pirate go bye bye.”

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm some places in the States they will cut off your electricity or water for sharing with a neighbor that has had theirs shut off. I have seen both happen personally, and not in some back water state. They both happened in upstate NY.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 131 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

If it's upheld, that's the precursor to full-blown info blackouts, just cut off internet to anyone 'accused' of wrongspeak against the powers that be, which is basically everyone.

This also sounds like SOPA reborn.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AGuyAcrossTheInternet@fedia.io 105 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not doing piracy, I am merely training my AI!

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The recent judgement did not, in fact, say that pirating was legal if you use the pirated material to train AI.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Call me when all these LLM get their internet cut off then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 95 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Being accused of will lose you access to basic infrastructure? Why not cut electricity too?

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 39 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Don't give them ideas. Next they'll cut the blood stream to your brain.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 92 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Accused???

Well alrighty then, I hereby accuse the operators of donaldjtrump.com of piracy! Anybody else notice any piratical activity? Foxnews.com seems pretty fishy.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 38 points 22 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago

I nominate we test with out with the Zuck and his networks.

[–] Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago

This still won’t make me pay for Netflix

[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] PeachMan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Protip for anyone unfamiliar: Mullvad really is the gold standard for a private VPN. If you just want to pirate shit and not get angry letters from your ISP, Nord or PIA will accomplish that. But if you REALLY want privacy, Mullvad is it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So if Meta is convicted of pirating books for AI training, they lose all internet connectivity? 🧐

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 18 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

dint they just rule AI can legally scrape/books, but not for people who are pirating directly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 53 points 1 day ago (7 children)

And now I'm on a VPN because if they're just gonna cut people off for accusing of piracy they're gonna have to cut off everyone with a VPN.

TBH I should have been behind a VPN before

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mullvad is the best $5 and change I spend each month.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I love Mullvad and used them for years, but without port forwarding, they're not the service you want for torrenting. Some alternatives like AirVPN or ProtonVPN are better suited for that stuff.

Before the haters jump in and tell me "it works fine fer me!" it's only working because the user on the other end, like myself, have port forwarding set up. Since you don't have it, you'll never connect to anyone else like yourself nor will they be able to connect to you.

Of course there are alternatives like streaming and Usenet but there are tradeoffs no matter what you pick.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pirate everything, death to the capitalists.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Get to the point that you don't want their products. Consuming their stuff at all is like sporting brand name cloths and covering the logo.

Once you do this you will find you don't need most of it and it's just a waste of time anyway. The stuff that is authentic and that you genuinely need you can support.

It's honestly like quitting drugs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 48 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

This is how you get a new darknet.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The mere accusation causing someone to lose the Internet, which is vital to modern life, would be insane.

Additionally, it would do little to nothing to stop piracy.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

they actually do think that if you stop piracy people will flock back to streaming services when in reality all that will happen is i'll just watch more twitch.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm not doing piracy, I'm just trading a lot of data packets with a Proton Server in Switzerland, nothing to see here 😉

load more comments (3 replies)

The unproven claims is the key part here. Also the point of "terminating an account would punish every user in a household" is important as well.

You can fine someone for piracy if you want. As long as they have the standard legal protections. But cutting access is excessive.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the beginning we used to exchange cassettes. You would have a boombox with two cassettes. You would play one while you recorded on the other. Then you gave the cassette back to your friend. Next was the VCR with the big ass cassettes.

Then you would do the same with floppies, then zip disks. Then one day CD recording was a thing, then DVDs. Then thumb drives and now portable HDDs. Basically the cheapest form or recording is always the most popular way for people to share stuff.

The only ones who don't want us to share are those who want to make millions by never innovating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 32 points 14 hours ago

All public wifi will be disconnected pretty quickly.

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

(Donald trump voice) "We should hold all food companys liable for users violent crimes, this man stabbed another man to death with a spoon! 30 minutes before he ate kraft mac and cheese. It gave him the energy to violently stab this innocent man"

Lets hope they got common sense

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catty@lemmy.world 25 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

lol, they'll have no customers! ISPs used to send 'warning' letters to customers in England but that's all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sickday@kbin.earth 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What will they do when entire College campuses lose internet access because half their students are pirating text books

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 24 points 13 hours ago

let's all fall on our sword to make sure Disney never loses a potential subscriber for Marvel Wars. Truly, we are defending the interests of the people here

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 18 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

4G piracy hub go brrrrr? Go ahead, disconnect me. I will get another SIM and resume piracy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just do what we do in Canada. Send them threatening letters. It scares 90% of parents into telling their kids to knock that shit off, but they're toothless and can't actually do anything, and the remaining 10% still pirate away. Everyone's happy.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

ISPs already do that here in the states. The court case is to decide whether they should shut off access.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›