this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1383 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

66975 readers
3871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 268 points 1 day ago (6 children)

In posts on X following the incident, Tesla CEO Elon Musk called the incidents “terrorism” and said the company “just makes electric cars and has done nothing to deserve these evil attacks.”

OK buddy.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 116 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The cars suck, but he's right that the company hasn't done anything to deserve this. He's the one who chose to make himself the face of Tesla, though, so however people feel about him, they'll feel about any business he owns.

Terrorism, though? Hardly. It's protest. He's the one doing terrorism by dismantling the government.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

The cars are poorly designed to the point of being dangerous. They deserve it a little.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (38 children)

Terrorism, though? Hardly.

Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature

Pretty much the definition of terrorism. Doesn't necessarily make it wrong.

That's what was so terrifying about the Patriot Act for so long.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 day ago (32 children)

Violent, criminal acts

Property damage is not violence and nonviolent protests are not terrorism. They will claim it is. They are lying.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Yes, but that definition also defines... basically all the most heinous things that Trump and those around him have done in the last... 5 years, lets say? ... as terrorism.

collapsed inline media

Remember CPAC, 2022?

... kinda speaks for itself.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The board needs to remove Elon today.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yep. I don't get why they haven't. He's tanking their shit badly.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (10 children)

They just paid fucking 60 billion dollars to him to keep him from quitting. Maybe a smidge of sunk cost fallacy.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ragingdachshund@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago

It’s not terrorism. They were just peacefully touring the dealerships. Just like January 6. Peacefully touring.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 141 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Problem with setting Teslas on fire is we can't know if it's an act of protest or if they just did that on their own.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They've become sentient, and are committing suicide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The incident in Kansas City genuinely does sound like one just caught itself on fire.

In Kansas City, Police Captain Jacob Becchina said in a statement that an officer first observed smoke coming from a Cybertruck parked in a Tesla parking lot. “The officer used his fire extinguisher, however, KCFD was still needed as he could not put the fire out,” Becchina said. “The fire spread to a second Cybertruck parked next to the original burning one. The circumstances are under investigation, but preliminarily, the fire is being investigated for the potential of being an Arson.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Could be insurance fraud too.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Curmudge_john@lazysoci.al 112 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

We know that Teslas sometimes just catch fire on their own.

We also know that sometimes Tesla drivers will set their cars on fire themselves on purpose. Because of that...

We also know that Elon has a backdoor into all Teslas.

Now ask yourself which is more likely, the woke liberal crybabies actually causing violence or a drug addled and politically embattled CEO of a company that lost 50% of its value in the past 3 months creating a false flag to villainize the left and get insurance to cover damage to the vehicles he can't sell?

/s (kind of)

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didnt the Nazi party burn down the Reichstag and blame it on the other party?

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They blamed it on the communist party, yes. There were 8 parties represented in the Reichstag at the time though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If unsold teslas catch fire, i'm convinced it's some insurance scam. A car sold and a car gone that they can't fix anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] techclothes@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Given Elons history, it's definitely possible.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 1 day ago (7 children)

if you know anything about who did it no you don't

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

It's obviously the MAGA crowd. They've spent years complaining about electric vehicles. They've just escalated that to burning them out. The police need to go have a nice chat with the rolling coal types.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 32 points 1 day ago

Probably god's will or something. What's the pont of investigating.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 84 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Insurance fraud due to slow sales

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago

Oh no. Anyway..

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago
[–] silverlose@lemm.ee 51 points 1 day ago (22 children)

Been thinking about this a lot. They can say it’s terrorism. History is written by the winners.

But…

Rebellion is constitutional, but not legal. If you rebel, you die a terrorist or live a hero. Not much middle ground.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 day ago

I have never, and will never, see anyone vandalize a Tesla. 🙈

[–] ragingdachshund@lemm.ee 47 points 1 day ago

Oh no. Anyways.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

I didn't see nuffin

[–] LucidLyes@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

"Trump administration looking to categorize Tesla vandalism as domestic terrorism" Because Republicans are cowards without principles who can never even think of opposing him.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I have zero evidence Musk ordered the Tesla vandalism. Which, coincidentally, is exactly how surprised I'd be to find out he had.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man, if I had the poor luck/foresight to have purchased a Tesla earlier, I would be driving like the politest mofo in existence these days.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd set it on fire and make an insurance claim.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago

Can't believe the Insurrection Act is gonna be used because of homie's swasticars

[–] the803@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"Resist" is a tired slogan of the paid-to-lose Democrats, and the last time I saw it surface as "angry-Leftist vandalism" in pluto-fash corporate media propaganda, it turned out to be a Republican trying to cover up insurance fraud. They are too incurious to understand the difference between antifa and liberals.

Kool-aid-drinking Tesla dealers are losing their shirts because Glorious Leader locked them into bad contracts and is now poisoning the brand; they have AMPLE incentive to destroy their own property and play victim.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As a reminder, Tesla is "direct to consumer" and the "dealership" is corporate owned!

So when the party of conspiracy theorists claims conspiracy against them, you can rest assured it's a conspiracy by them.

But that's what they'd say if the the tables were turned, so fuck 'em and their shit. I hope the insurance adjuster finds a way out and leaves them holding the bag.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 day ago

I don't care who burns 'em. So long as they're burnt.

[–] lydon_feen@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago

Oh no!

Anyway...

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

Ohhhhhh nooooooooooo! Let me grab my very tiny violin.

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 17 points 18 hours ago

Oh no! they should be dismantled instead of burned. Some of those electric motors could be put into better use.

load more comments
view more: next ›