this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
788 points (99.4% liked)

politics

24145 readers
2857 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 166 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That means all those troops were following illegal orders.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly, stop going after trump. Go after every officer and government agents who followed those orders. See how fast they enforce his bullshit when they’re facing personal consequences

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can’t that asshole just pardon them though?

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but maybe Trump issuing illegal orders to the military and offering pardons to those that follow them would be the catalyst Congress needs to pass an amendment limiting presidential pardon power.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Maybe someday we'll honor the 14th amendment, nullifying 47th's term, rendering all of his pardons void

You know, since enemies of the US cannot hold office

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bdjukeemgood@lemm.ee 28 points 2 days ago

Lock them all up. Pure evil. Orders should always be considered against the interpretation of law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 116 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A federal judge has ruled that President Donald Trump acted illegally in deploying the National Guard to address protests in the Los Angeles area.

In a ruling issued Thursday evening, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer wrote that such use of the National Guard was a violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution and exceeded the statutory authority granted to the president.

The order, which takes effect Friday, says the administration must return control of the California National Guard to the state of California.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Doesn’t he have immunity now?

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 65 points 2 days ago (3 children)

They may not be able to prosecute him, but they can make him stop what he's doing. Theoretically.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It does seem the power of the judiciary will be challenged quite soon.

It will probably be with a tweet saying "Make me. You and what army?" and the courts will need to rely on the US military choosing the Constitution over the Commander in Chief.

May we all have the fortune to live securely in less interesting times. I suppose it is our duty to make that happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

And when he inevitably doesn’t listen they’ll make a really strong pouty face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Might be true, but since the orders are illegal, the NG are following illegal orders if they continue, meaning potential court martial (depending on many factors).

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He does, but anyone following illegal orders doesn’t. Sure, he could pardon them, but only after a long, expensive, and potentially life-changing legal battle after which they’re convicted.

That doesn’t sound like a fight most regular troops should want to gamble on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 95 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 82 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The legal system is just not equipped to deal with the threat implied by Trump.

In the US it seems like judges are just another executive arm of the government anyway.

The few actual judges still considering the law just get perpetually paused with appeals and what have you.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Innuendo Studios becoming more prevalent, and more prescient.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At first I was like "this video is 6 years old, how could this possibly be relevant to this conversation?"

Then I watched the video and realized, "yep... same shit, different day." The conservative playbook hasn't changed a bit and Democrats keep falling for it.

I hate to say this, but you could go back 40 years and this would still be true. 6 years ago, TACO was still in office.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So...just let him keep breaking the law until it reaches the Supreme Court? I thought they were supposed to pause his actions, pending appeal...not let him keep going.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

just let him keep breaking the law until it reaches the Supreme Court?

Also after it reaches the Supreme Court.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago

The National Guard should release all arrested protesters, return to base and tell the Governor of California that they are "reporting for duty". If not, they are traitors (already before but then even more so).

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Temporary order while they consider it. Could still go either way.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 67 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The past year doesn't give me the feeling that this will change anything.

Trump is still free and doing his dumbevil stuff

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Need more Democrats to sit and wave cardboard signs. Need more protests to run head first into riot shields. Need more leftist to leave social media spaces wide open. Need more Faygo.

Then maybe things will be different

[–] Sightline@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh ok, cool. So naturally he's been or will soon be placed under arrest, because that's how being illegal works.

[–] blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not anymore, it's not. He's immune from any sort of prosecution related to the job.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He will just ignore it, and double down. Nothing will happen.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 34 points 2 days ago

Nothing will happen.

The judge might get fired.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The question is whether the California National Guard will follow Trump's orders or Newsom's orders in a situation where a court has ruled that Newsom is who they currently work for.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

It's been paused on appeal...

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Within an hour an appeals judge put a 1 week stay on the ruling. Fucking corrupt judges

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The legal system in which the poor languish in jail for years awaiting trial moves extremely quickly when it wants to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drislands@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Are you saying that's happened? Or that you expect it will?

[–] thepenismightier@lemm.ee 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Read the article it's literally in the first sentence.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure that means there will be repercussions

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Jail time, no doubt

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Oooooohhhhhh, you broke the law, president trump!"

".......yeah? And?"

And nothing happened.

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No no you don't understand... The PRESIDENT broke a law... This is like yuge. America won't stand for this.

Jkjk this is just Thursday, tune in tomorrow night for night TGIF! If I haven't seen it, it's new to me!

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Hello fellow millennial or older.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t it be nice if rulings against the talibangelical dictatorship actually carried any weight anymore?

[–] DanVctr@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Y'all Qaeda at it again

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry, Chuck Schumer will lower his glasses a little and give Trump a stern look from across town.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Then come up with six strongly word questions and send them an email!!! Got em!!!

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Awesome, so... I don't expect him to be arrested or impeached, or for there to even be an investigation or anything.

I'm hoping for something more realistic like taking away his screen time for the weekend, or at least till he says he's sowwy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] doug@lemmy.today 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago

Now punish him! Do it! 😬

load more comments
view more: next ›