Why do you have to be such an ass about it?
Gender bias is a real thing.
Why do you have to be such an ass about it?
Gender bias is a real thing.
I'm not sure how much time you've spent in South East Asia, and Thailand specifically, but professional roles are heavily male dominated, old boys clubs, pay gaps, et cetera.
If an employee takes "menstrual leave", that's an easy way for male dominated management to suggest that women aren't suitable for higher level roles because they are unpredictable and less physically capable.
It's pretty easy to imagine these mental hoops honestly.
I've never heard of it before.
As a guy, I need to hear a woman's opinion, but ...
My initial reaction is that it perpetuates the perception that women are inferior. As in, if I were in a professional environment competing for promotion with men, I sure as shit would be doing my absolute best to avoid having to take any menstruation leave.
Very on brand for modern conservative south-east asian country. You can appear to be accommodating to women while actually building barriers.
I just had hot English on my roast pork for dinner. Magnificent.
What's an accessible way for a non-wealthy person to bet against the AI bubble?
Yes I understand that this is tantamount to gambling.
This is obviously "good" but can someone help me understand how meaningful this is?
I presume this is a good indicator that the happenings in recent month have "activated" voters?
But... he's right?
These comments really illustrate how badly Lemmy has become a homogenised echo chamber.
Users just subscribe to these generalised binary concepts like religion = terrible, and any attempt to demonstrate the nuance is downvoted.
Not sure what youre getting at.
Obviously it depends how good and how bad.
Also, there going to show both - but the frequency of each will depend on their assessed likelihood that im going to click and the revenue generated if I do so.
Sorry I don't understand why your grandma would say that.
If she got pregnant to a guy out of wedlock she would be entirely at his mercy. Presumably your great-grandpa did the right thing all the way along. However, there would be no way to force him to contribute to the child's welfare. Additionally, your own prospects as an unmarried mother were pretty dismal I think.
In 2025 I think things have changed - there's certainly no point being married in Australia for example. The mother of my children is not my mistress, she's my partner. In the context of the law she is the same as my wife. The reason we're together is not a piece of paper or a promise, it's because every day for the last 12 years we have woken up and chosen to remain together.
Polygamous or poly-amorous relationships are more common than they ever have been?
Honestly it sounds like great grandma was saying "I stayed with the man I loved and it worked out for me but you should get married".
Sure, but I'm sure you can imagine what would happen if your managers are almost exclusively male, looking for ways to exclude women from the boys club, and you take menstrual leave a few times a year.