EldritchFeminity

joined 2 years ago
[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And Republicans claim that the US is a Christian nation all the time, despite half the Founding Fathers being either atheists or at least agnostic and specifically and expressly stating that the US is not beholden to any one religion.

I am in no way defending Putin or Stalin, but just because he claims to be honoring a former leader doesn't mean that he actually is. So long as it suits the propaganda narrative, people like him, the Republicans, and Israel will claim whatever they want about history.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed, and I vaguely remembered something along these lines from my time cooking them, but I also know how many that I was cooking in a day as just a small scale operation at a local fish market cooking and shucking for lobster meat and cooking for the occasional customer to take home with them (I think the most we did in a day was close to one metric ton), and how unfeasible it is to do on a large scale.

I was doing 50 lbs at a time per pot, with 2 large stovetop pots at a time. That's 25+ lobsters per pot, averaging probably about 60 lobsters per hour that I was cooking by myself. Imagining trying to do that at an industrial scale sounds like the kind of thing that would effectively kill lobster meat as anything other than an expensive specialty item.

And although maybe it should kill mass market lobster meat (why in the hell does McDonald's sell lobster rolls in the first place???), I also have a visceral gut reaction to the idea of effectively making a food the exclusive domain of the rich. Especially when my boss at that job would make a big stink about people buying fish with Social Security money like poor people don't deserve to eat anything other than rice and beans.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I feel like chilling them is even worse. They usually live in cold waters, and chilling them in cold air (like a fridge) will just mostly make them suffocate for a while before you boil them alive. They can live a long time out of the water in a cold environment/on ice (think 24 to 48 hours long, not 2 or 3) because it just slows down their biological processes since they're cold blooded. They're just going to warm up again as they're boiling, and it will probably take longer to start boiling as they have to come back up from a lower temperature.

Even the shock method seems kinda useless. It would need to knock them out for about 20 minutes to ensure that they're unconscious until they're dead.

The most humane thing to do would be to kill them somehow in one moment, like with a concussive force or stabbing through the brain stem, but that then runs into the issue of how quickly dead lobsters go bad (also the issue of presentation - people don't want a crushed lobster staring at them from their plate). It's actually illegal in plenty of places to sell dead lobsters (or even cook them!) due to this, so they would have to be killed on site just before being cooked, which is a tall order when 1lb of lobster meat requires about 5lbs of lobster to make (roughly about a 20% yield on lobsters) and it takes about 5 years for a lobster to reach 1lb in size (and then about 2 years for every pound after that).

All of this said, it's all still probably more humane than that one company I used to work with back when I was in this kind of industry that was experimenting with getting raw lobster meat out of lobsters by tossing them into a pressure vessel.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe you should learn the meaning of words before you start using them. Somebody responding to what you say isn't censorship. Not even close.

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences.

Quite honestly, I don't think the average person even knows what open source means. They just know that Mozilla, like every other company, is shoving AI into their product, and that AI has either been useless or actively harmful to their user experience.

I mean, I bet they'd make a killing off of Firefox themed thigh highs...

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

People don't trust that it can be truly turned off and that it won't act maliciously in some way. That's really the crux of the whole saga. We're at a point where phone companies are getting survey results that say that 80% of users either don't care about AI nor use it or find that it actively makes their user experience worse.

I think the big defining question is what will the AI features that they will implement do exactly and how will they run. If it's something that runs in the background (even as unintrusive as the summaries on a search engine like DDG), then it's opt out by default as it's constantly running whether you want it to or not. If it specifically and exclusively runs when you hit the button to activate it and doesn't run at any other time, then I'd say it's unequivocally opt in. And regardless of what a company says that their software will do, at this point I won't believe it until somebody has done a full teardown and discerned what exactly it does behind the scenes. I've seen enough nonsense like the Epic Games Store accessing your browser history and recording keyboard inputs or whatever the other absurd incident was.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If it starts reading pages or doing things without you pushing a button, that's an issue.

And therein lies the rub. The question is whether or not people trust that it won't be doing that regardless of whether or not you hit the kill switch.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Except, right now, they absolutely are. The tools are largely as you describe - though thinking about it, I think I'd describe it more as an airbrush vs a paint brush - but that's not the way that upper management sees it for the most part, and not how the average supporter of GenAI sees it even if they don't recognize that that's their view. Both of these groups see it as a way to cut costs by reducing manpower, even if the GenAI folk don't recognize that that's what their stance is (or refuse to accept it). It's the same as in the programming side of the conversation: vibe coders and prompt generators being hired instead of skilled professionals who can actually use the tools where they're truly useful. Why pay an artist or programmer to do the work when I can just ask an LLM trained on stolen work to do it for me instead.

I read a great post probably a year ago now from somebody who works for a movie studio on why the company has banned hiring prompters. The short of it is, they hired on a number of prompters to replace some jobs that would normally be filled by artists as a test to see if they could reduce their staff while maintaining the same levels of production. What they found was that prompters could produce a massive volume of work very quickly. You ask the team for pictures of a forest scene and the artists would come back in a week with a dozen concepts each while the prompters had 50 the next day. But, if you asked them to take one of their concept pieces and do something like remove the house in it or add people in the foreground, they'd come back the next day with 50 new concept pieces but not the original. They couldn't grasp the concept of editing and refining an image, only using GenAI to generate more with a new set of prompt parameters, and therefore were incapable of doing the work needed that an artist could do.

A feel-good story for artists showing what AI is actually capable of and what it isn't, except for one thing: the company still replaced artists with AI before they learned their lesson, and that's the phase most of the world is in right now and will probably continue to be in until the bubble bursts. And as Alanah Pierce so eloquently put it when talking about the record setting year over year layoffs in the gaming industry (each year has been worse than during the 2008 financial crash): "Most of those people will never work in games again. There's just too many people out of work and not enough jobs to go around." These companies currently in the fuck around phase will find out eventually, but by then it won't matter for many people. They'll never find a job in their field in time and be forced into other work. Art is already one of the lowest paying jobs for the amount of effort and experience required. Many artists who work on commissions do so for less than minimum wage, and starting wages in the game industry for artists haven't increased since I was looking at jobs in the field 15 years ago.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To put it quite simply, Americans don't know how to protest anymore.

Our communities have been gutted and any support structures destroyed, and we've been fed lie after lie for decades about the "proper" way to protest. The only people who can afford to protest are those who have already lost everything and college kids, and they face constant harassment from the progressives for not protesting out of sight where they can be easily ignored and violence from the conservatives and cops with no repercussions.

Everybody else has just enough left to be afraid to do anything that would risk losing it, and they have to spend all their energy trying to keep their head above the water anyway, so they don't have the time or energy to put towards swimming for dry land. Plus a good portion of the population is busy trying to push everyone else's heads underwater and drown them. It's the same reason why the Nazis managed to embroil the entire world in a war and commit one of the worst genocides to date while only making up maybe 25% of the German populace at their largest. I think they maxed out around 15%.

Nothing will happen until a certain threshold of the population has nothing left to lose.

You underestimate the ability of the American populace (Republicans) to handwave away and justify any action so long as it's their team who's guilty. It won't be long until they're arguing about the distinction between pedos and "minor attracted people" and ephebophilia.

view more: next ›