this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
476 points (96.5% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

4826 readers
663 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

(Sorry, not sorry for the old yet still valid meme)

I just wanted everyone here to know that !theorville@lemmy.world has been ~~taken over~~ relaunched by me and will become an active community again!

In the name of interplanetary peace, everyone here is invited to sub if you have not already done so and to start posting whatever news/discussion/memes related to The Orville you can think of.

I'm going to add .world's c/startrek and c/tenforward to the links section of our community and I hope you guys do the same.

Happy Arbor Day! (No, seriously, the 25th of April is actually Arbor Day.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teft@lemmy.world 94 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My face when I realize the crossover meming potential:

collapsed inline media

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The Orville was sweet justice for Penny Johnson Jerald as an actor. She has been so good and used so well as Doctor Finn.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It has all been downhill since the late 90s

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Fuck, Agent Smith was right.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago

I put 9/11 as the beginning of the end.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Finn screaming is already a meme.

collapsed inline media

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlexisBlackbird@lemmy.ca 72 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Discovery gets more hate then it deserves, but The Orville is certainly more of a Star Trek show. I'm glad I stuck out the rough start (which is on brand for a Star Trek show lol)

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Discovery gets more hate then it deserves

I think the problem is the writers clearly had a show that they wanted and for some bizarre reason they decided that it was also going to be a Star Trek show even though they clearly didn't actually want it to be Star Trek.

If they just made it its own thing it would have been fine, but all this Star Trek lore kept popping up and then they had to come up with some hand wavy explanation for why their particular vision doesn't fit established canon, and the whole thing just didn't work as a result.

I would have been totally down for a "magic exists alongside the sci-fi technology" show. There's a lot they could have done with that concept, but then for some reason they kept trying to introduce Klingons into it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (12 children)

but then for some reason they kept trying to introduce Klingons into it.

Ones with a third different head shape, no less!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Fourth. You forgot about the "Kelvin timeline" Star Trek films.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t that be 5 then?

  • TOS
  • ST: VI
  • TNG
  • ST: Kelvin Timeline
  • ST: Discovery
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Interesting point! Had to look up some screenshots, but it does look like they were maybe trying to "bridge the gap" between the TOS and TNG-era Klingon look in that film, which I am going to be watching again after this meeting in order to verify.

Even if it's an intentional transitory look, I'll agree that it's still unique, and therefore counts. Great call.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I'd say there are up to 8 designs, depending on how much you want to nitpick:

  • TOS: Smooth. Unnaturally smooth.
  • TMP: Single column ridge with hair on either side. Behind the scenes the concept was that the spinal column continued up from the back all around the head.
  • TSFS: Ridges cover the forehead, are wider and flatter, and have a continuous hairline behind them. Female Klingons have substantially less pronounced ridges.
  • TUC: Chang has those same less pronounced ridges. Maybe it's not a male/female thing. Or maybe Chang is trans?
  • TNG: Those less pronounced ridges are gone. Male and female Klingons both get roughly the same degree of lumpyness.
  • Kelvin: Ridges look flatter and more pleated. I don't think we see any hair, but it's been a while.
  • Disco: Coneheads, quadruple nostrils, and no hair.
  • Disco S2: Partial retcon as the Klingons start growing their hair in and the heads appear less conical.
  • Picard/SNW: Fully revert to the TNG era look. Doesn't count since it isn't a new design.
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I remember right before Discovery aired they showed a few behind the scenes pictures and one of them included the Klingon uniforms.

Me and a lot of other people started saying “Did they steal those from the Abrams movies?”

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] AlexisBlackbird@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Agreed. It's a decent action scifi show that is hurt by trying to fit the IP. It did do some interesting things with the mirror universe, and some of the latter season parts where it takes nonsensical one off TOS concepts and completely seriously says "that's canon, let's build a plot point on it" were entertaining, if not good.

But it just doesn't get Star Trek and it says something that I tell people getting in to the shows not to watch it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Strange new worlds is legit though

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frigidaphelion@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I respectfully disagree, discovery is a truly awful star trek installment. However I respect your opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Now I'm thinking I should give it another try.

I gave Discovery half a season, I have the Orville 2 or 3 episodes and while it was funny it didn't really click for me. I just lost interest after a few episodes.

Edit: just finished episode 3. Now I remember why I didn't keep watching. I should have just read the plot breakdown and skipped the episode. It just left a bad taste in my mouth.

[–] FrChazzz@lemm.ee 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The best way that I found to think about The Orville is that Seth MacFarlane had to shoe-horn jokes into the first few episodes to satisfy the execs who expected him to make a comedy and then gradually that tapers off to become a really solid Star Trek-type show (that still has humor, but it’s more organic, workplace type humor).

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, it follows a lot of the "futuristic parallels to modern day issues" that we saw with ToS and TNG, while at the same time adding in humor that ranges from tongue-in-cheek to outright raunchy. I can't imagine a TNG episode that would address "holodeck sex addiction" but Orville actually manages to do a pretty good job of stradding seriousness of that issue along with humor.

For the more serious stuff: imagine an alliance when it's discovered that one of the members has done (and is still doing) some stuff that's pretty strongly against the morals of the rest. If called on it they threaten to pull out. While all are in the middle of a war for survival. And they're also one of the biggest weapons suppliers

That's pretty close to some issues today while also being years old.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

The Orville is a weird show. It hews very closely to the format and production design of 90s Trek (including a lot of budget-conscious decisions), and many of the creatives have a Star Trek background going back that far. Frankly, I think a lot of the scripts were from the TNG slush pile. It's clearly a love letter to those shows.

However, it's also clearly Seth MacFarlane's love letter. He gets to be the captain. His friends and lovers get to play major parts despite sometimes not really having the acting chops for it. The characters are all obsessed with the cultural touchstones of white American Gen-X'ers. In the early going, the Family-Guy/Ted/etc. sense of humor is front and center, and while that gets much better, it never fully goes away. One can also just about imagine 20-something Seth and his buddies screaming at the TV that there is no moral ambiguity in a given ST episode and that Jean Luc needs to just pick a side.

In some ways, it can be pretty rough, but then, mostly because it is such an earnest homage, it's greater than the sum of its parts. I never fell in love with it the way many have, but after wading through the first few episodes and getting a feel for what it was and wasn't, I grew fond of it. I'd say it's worth watching, but you don't have to apologize for not fully buying in. TBH, I feel fairly similar levels of tempered fondness for Disco, though for very different reasons.

[–] AlexisBlackbird@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

wjrii hit the nail on the head. If you categorically don't like the vibe it might not be for you. Like any true Trek show it takes time to find its feet. The plot is coarse and hamfisted (as a trans person, the trans allegory episode was hard to get through) but eventually turns around to be a good example of scifi for contemporary social commentary. The humour (both quality and balance) improves but it doesn't stop being a Seth MacFarlane show. I value its earnesty, but it's pretty far down the list for my suggested "Star Trek" viewing order.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

It got the hate it deserved

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

Scenery: repainted ikea furniture

vulcan / doctor / kirk: check

All extraterrestrial planets are shot in the back lot: check

Well, everything seems to be acceptable here.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (5 children)
[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Me too. I would like if they packed a little more humour into the season, like season 1 and 2. Season 3 was a little too serious. It was good, don't get me wrong, but there were just a little too far between the jokes.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The problem with s3 wasn't the seriousness - we had plenty of that everywhere else - it was the missing small moments. Those little filler moments they slipped into the episodic serials that picked out little threads here and there and brought such a very very heartwarmingly humorous and human element to the show. Bortus’ moustache. The random Karaoke. Talking shit in the mess, finding out a crewmember can eat anything and Gordon promptly producing a cactus and a dare. Latchkum!   Shit that made you invest in the characters.  The reminder that even in utopia we're still batshit humanity

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Admittedly I haven't exactly been keeping up with the news but it's been radio silence for a few years now so I am kind of sceptical.

The fact that they didn't immediately go into season 4 after finishing season 3, which is what most shows do, kind of implied that the studio at least felt done with it. Which personally I think was short-sighted. You don't leave large gaps like that because it increases the likelihood that the actors are going to go off and get other gigs. It's not like they're being paid in the interim so they kind of have to.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The timing was that Disney was in the process of transferring ownership of all the 20th Century Fox media to them right as The Orville would have been gearing up for a fourth season production.

What’s more interesting than them not immediately green-lighting it was that they never ever canceled it. Disney rattled off a list of Fox/Hulu properties they wouldn’t continue and The Orville was suspiciously absent. Seth confirmed later on that he was negotiating to continue the show and told fans to never say die.

And, yeah, the extended production timeline of season 3 is what made Adrianne Palicki (Kelly Grayson) walk. It seems like most, if not all, the rest of the principal cast is still onboard.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rah@feddit.uk 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm going to add .world's c/startrek and c/tenforward to the links section of our community and I hope you guys do the same.

Why?! They are totally different shows that share no similarities, do not share themes, do not share numerous details, share no actors, writers or directors and are just completely different, distinct SF shows!

/s

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

This comment directed by Jonathan Frakes

[–] frigidaphelion@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

good god I love the orville so much

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 20 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I tried The Orville, but got a little put off by McFarlane as the captain.
Does this improve as the series goes on?
As I might give it another shot.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It does get better, and Ed becomes a lot less wishy-washy.

The conceit of The Orville is that it’s not the best ship in the fleet with the best crew. The Orville is an older mid-sized cruiser and the only reason Ed made Captain is because they couldn’t find enough Captains to fill out a rapidly-expanding fleet. So they gave this unimportant ship to him.

I think they spent way too much time on Ed getting over his divorce with his XO Kelly, but after that he’s fine.

As for the show itself, only the Pilot really feels like “Family Guy in space,” because that was a Trojan Horse to get the show on the air in the first place. After that, it really does become a send up to The Next Generation and the 3rd season, New Horizons, is an actual science fiction epic.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a reassuring bit of info. If the in-universe explanation is that he isn't the best captain, I might give it another shot.
As my initial reaction was "has McFarlane just made himself kirk?"

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 9 points 2 days ago

No, he actually sidelines himself quite a bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I didn't like the humor, but it tones down in each season. By season 3, the humor is about as frequent as a lighthearted TNG episode, and it's done better.

Doesn't really matter, because it's a show pretending to be satire so it could get greenlit. It's just a TNG-era Star Trek with a different coat of paint. There are a lot of places where it's doing the same plot as some other bit of Star Trek, except doing it better with more lead up across many episodes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Stick with it. The first few episodes were terrible, and I was very pessimistic about it's future. Then it suddenly got better very quickly, and became nearly as good as the Star Trek series'. Its gotten even better as time went on. Im looking forward to its return.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Farscape: any chance you could send O’Brian over for some pure jet fuel?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They need to make more Orvilles.

[–] FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

That's fantastic Aeronmelon! I've just added a link to our sidebar!

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Five hundred cigarettes

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 13 points 3 days ago

Subscribed!

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Here I am a novice Trek fan booking the next few years to watching the rest of the Star Trek I've never seen ..... now I have to add this to my list

Thanks! .... and subscribed!

You’re in for a wild ride!

load more comments
view more: next ›