this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
425 points (96.9% liked)

Not The Onion

18741 readers
879 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 85 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Furthering that they are indeed not the "Pro-Life" party but instead the "Pro-Birth" party.

[–] adubya@feddit.online 27 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Agree but starting to even wonder about that. I've never seen them do anything that benefits births let alone even celebrate it. Seems to be "Pro-Misery especially at others expense".

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 7 points 13 hours ago

That's where the "the cruelty is the point" expression comes from

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 11 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Remember, their cars are the gaint Yukons with a convoy of body guards aren't safe enough. But your car. It could literally be a gascan strapped to tricycle for all they care.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It could literally be a gascan strapped to tricycle for all they care.

collapsed inline media

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Time to mandate every car's steering column has a 1.5ft razor sharp spike sticking out of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 39 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This is the only excuse for the massive inflation of new car prices vs. rate of wage increases over the decades. I will give auto engineers props for this accomplishment; cars are so much safer now than 30 years ago.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Dont sleep on either "many new cars are electric" or "cars last a fuckton longer".

Per-capira "total cost of ownership" for a car from purchase to retirement hasnt increased nearly as much as first-sale price would suggest. (Though the "financing cost" of the one-or-more transactions is a separate matter.)

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Never buy new. Let someone else deal with the frequent hassle of getting all the problems fixed "under warranty" while the lemons get sent to salvage. Give me the vehicles that survive. Case in point, I bought my first car for $500, drove it for 24 years, and the biggest age-related expense was rebuilding the front end for $600. I sold the car in 2011 for $1000. I bought my current SUV in 2009 and the biggest mechanical failures have been replacing the power steering pump and the 4WD short axles.

I had a friend who insisted he needed to spend all his money buying new cars. He tried to tell me how much money he was saving because the dealership was fixing all the problems for free. I pointed out that he had barely even driven his new car because it was spending more time at the dealership every week or two and he was constantly wasting his own time taking it back for yet another problem.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Good advice, though not really germane to the topic.

Somebody has to buy the new cars for there to be used cars for you to buy, and the price you offer has to be more valuable to them than the car they're selling.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

FWIW, A good argument for buying new isn't "look what the dealer's fixing", but rather "I don't want hidden surprises". Private party sales can very much be caveat emptor, and even getting a dealership to stand by their claims can be unprofitable.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's what rich people are for -- to suffer for the benefit of the working class.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

What year was that? I don't believe a $500 car would last 24 more years. These days you can't even buy a 24 year old car for $500

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It was a '74 Pontiac LeMansthat I bought in 1987. And sorry, I did forget about one thing... I had to replace the transmission a couple times, but back then you could get them from a junkyard for cheap, and it only took a couple hours to replace. Probably would have lasted a lot longer if I'd taken the time to rebuild the clutches though. Of course it's not like you can drive any vehicle forever, there was the maintenance as things like bushings and alternators wore out. For this discussion though I don't count things that you have to do on any vehicle with 300k miles on it. Everything wears out eventually, and yeah even the motor was starting to smoke by that time.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah kinda burying the lede on this. Cars built in the 70s had a much more simple, serviceable construction.

By the time you let it go, it was also probably grandfathered in to emissions requirements because it's a classic car.

Anything from the 90s- 2010 will not hold up like that one did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Everything is a special model these days which makes the price higher. You don't see mid range, average cars anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 36 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Clearly not the onion. My right wing father (not Republican because we are not American and he's technically a monarquist) complains that cars are too expensive due to the mandatory security features. Features that he has on his fully equipped Porsche because he wants to be safe, obviously.

[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

as someone from the country where porsche is native and where it owns their own political party.. owning a porsche is one of the clearest signs one can send that they are a massive asshole lol

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 31 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Instead of patching over the rising costs, maybe we can move to living in communities that aren't so dependent on such a costly, depreciating asset for every home?

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 28 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (9 children)

Replace seat belts with piano wire and make air bags with 50x the explosive charge but replace the airbag with ball bearings.

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Exactly! Except I make Lemmy shitposts for shits and giggles and am not an "economics professor" who needs to be taken seriously and never gets invited to parties.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 28 points 5 hours ago

You mean the group of people that are okay with schools being used for target practice thinks cars are too safe?! I am shocked.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Car Companies: "the regulations are so big and heavy and workers cost so much munnies. Pls let us do less QA on the vehicles mandatory to live in america."

Republicans: "CRUSH MORE CHILDREN, who would dare inconvenience these poor sweet automotive corporations?!"

Anyone paying attention: "Yall know aside from oil companies, car companies are the most ridiculously subsidized companies on earth?"

[–] Botunda@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago

Jesus fuck! What the fuck is it with these fuckers!?!? really? Cars are too safe!??! WTF?

I am guessing they want to deregulate the safety laws so that they can take the money that they spend on it and stick it into their pockets and still keep the price of cars the same!

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They aren't even save for anyone outside the vehicle, to the point that death are increasing already. not just bikes video

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I watched this, and was surprised to see this article. Like what timing on both ends.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with them whole heartedly. When they remove seat belts, they need to be the first to become a pavement puddle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Definitely Not The Onion material. Heck, you could almost convince me that this is The Onion.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

The Onion ate the GOP.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 9 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I've been seeing a lot of weird culture war coverage around this, even more than usual these days. Big fan of cheap, simple, accessible technology and tools. Cars are tools. Less components and less complexity means they are cheaper to produce and maintain. Bring back the econobox, the car I'm hype for is the electric equivalent of a 94 Corolla

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Also, cars that are excessively safe for their occupants tend to make them deadlier to other road users.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CyLith@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

Cars in some ways are too coddling, giving people a false sense of safety. All these new features like lane keeping and blind spot warnings make people drive with reckless abandon.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I've seen people over rely on bad lane assist and just kinda ping pong from side to side in their lane. It's... kinda stupid.

Also, what's the deal with the side mirror light that turns on when someone is near? My car has a small convex mirror attached to the standard one and I can see my blind spot quite clearly.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

If we took every conservative on the planet and put them on an island together, how long do you think it would take before the cannibalism and incest kicked in?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 4 points 1 hour ago

Lol you're assuming they aren't doing that now?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sirdubdee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Tbh, it would be kind of nice if sensors weren’t put in easily damaged areas of cars. They’re part of why bumpers and tailgates are so much more expensive. I wonder if cars could have all the safety features using a couple little LIDAR and camera packages instead of chips on every piece of plastic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Buy motorcycles. Problem solved.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Yes Ted Cruz I totally believe that if they got rid of these Safety Systems cars would magically get cheaper. No one should doubt that for a second Ted Cruz. There's no way they'll just get rid of the safety system and then pocket the extra the proceeds. Ted Cruz would never be for that I'm sure.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Maybe if American "cars" were actually car sized, they would need a lot less material to be made, and require a less powerful cheaper motor to move all that metal around.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

Cars can never be too safe. What I want is a car with no computers or telemetry whatsoever. I want a car that is private with how I use it. Like what they were pre 2000s. Just a hunk of metal to go from point A to point B.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›