this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
185 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

76635 readers
2481 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 89 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Just had a conversation about this. I'll copypasta what I said there.

https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

tl;dr: they’re all in on AI (their own model, FastGPT, which is terrible), they make some very questionable business decisions with limited funds, and have a poor understanding of what Personally Identifiable Information (PII) actually is.

I could compromise on some of these things, but if I’m going to pay for their service as a Google alternative, I need to compromise less than I do with Google already.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Also DDG is a perfectly viable option.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Appreciate you linking in your blog post. I've been on the fence about Kagi and you bring up a lot of good points informed by sources I'm unlikely to delve into.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To put you back on the fence, it had the best algorithm when I tested it some time ago. It showed me things I wanted by default. Google always needs some massaging and ddg needs a !g

[–] EvenOdds@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Agreed. I pay for Kagi, and find their search better than any other, and struggle when I'm forced to use another search engine temporarily.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dammit, my fence picket didn't even get cold!

[–] mmmac@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah no im with the above user on this one. I have used kagi for over a year now and have never needed to use another search engine to find something

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same here.

Finding actual answers or at least able to point me in the right direction is way better than any of the other search engines I’ve tried.

DDG, Google, Bing, SearchNX, Ecosia, Brave, and probably some more, they just aren’t even in the same ball field for the things I look up personally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] padge@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

Thanks for sharing this, very informative read. I might have to go through that Cohost article when I have a spare hour haha

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I use Kagi because the truth is all other corporate alternatives at this point are unusable swill.

That said, I do not like the company and disagree with their choices in many aspects.

For one, while they don't force you to use AI features, there isn't a way to explicitly turn them off for your account, there always the opportunity to rack up token costs if you accidently hit one of the AI buttons.

They still don't run their own index, instead complacent to just pay the other search providers. Additionally, if you're trying to escape Google... Kagi runs on Google Cloud Services.

There's more complaints, and I'm sure others will chime in, but that's my take.

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

there always the opportunity to rack up token costs if you accidently hit one of the AI buttons.

How do you mean? I don't think there's any way to incur charges for AI usages beyond your subscription fee unless you are coding against their API.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The AI assistant is backed by several different models which IIRC just call out to those providers (Op*nAI API, etc) and rack up tokens in the billing system:

collapsed inline mediaimage
You might be right that the AI cost is included when below the plan price — to that I have to say, give me a fucking cheaper plan that doesn't implicitly include the cost of AI.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] logi@piefed.world 24 points 2 days ago

Hey, Good job not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.

[–] specialwall@midwest.social 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What specifically do you think is hard to avoid? I've never accidentally triggered a quick answer, personally

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Some people like them, they do have at least some ties to a Russian company which is a no from me at the moment.

[–] specialwall@midwest.social 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Paying for Yandex APIs is a product of their goal to be the best search engine available. They pay for access to nearly every major search provider and wouldn't want to lose access to Yandex results just because of the country they're located in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 32 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It depends on what you want. I use Kagi but I have not sold it on my friends and family because for most of them, it doesn't really make sense.

I've found it to be the best search engine, but I also think DuckDuckGo is generally fine. The $5/month plan with 300 searches per month is too limiting, IMO. I feel like anyone who searches that lightly will struggle to justify paying for Kagi over using DDG. For unlimited searches you need to step up to the $10/month plan.

When I started using Kagi, I did the free trial and every time I did a search, I'd do it in both Kagi and Google or DDG. It quickly became clear to me that Kagi was better, but I suspect this will vary a lot by your field, your tastes, and your personal search style. I mean, maybe there's someone out there who actually wants to look at Pinterest results. I guess?!

If you ever considered paying for ChatGPT Pro or Claude Pro ($20/month), then Kagi's Ultimate plan ($25/month) is probably a better value. It includes unlimited search, plus access to all the major premium models. On the other hand, ChatGPT Pro gives you access to image generation too, if you care about that.

Kagi's research agent is legitimately great. It is nothing like the bullshit generator Google has. It will take a prompt, then run multiple web searches to get relevant info, recursively if needed, and then give a meaningful response with citations. It shows you the exact search queries it uses, along with the results it pulls from. I've used it to find accurate answers to problems that I realistically could not have found with traditional search engines; in one case the actual answer was something like 18 results deep in the 5th search it performed. I think most people would give up before digging that deep in search results.

This is what AI is good for: automating gruntwork. Not doing things I couldn't do myself, but doing things I don't fucking want to do myself because they are tedious and frustrating. 99% of AI applications are pure garbage. Kagi's is part of the other 1%.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

I've been on the $5 a month plan, and go over probably half the time. The months when I do go over, it just means I start the next month a couple of days early. I'm probably actually somewhere around $6 a calendar month; my Kagi month is probably only 28 days or so.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I am open to the idea of paying for quality services that put the customer first. Hell, I pay for my email and have done so for years.

But Kagi has always squicked me out a bit. Some of their business practices over the years have been rather questionable, especially their push into AI which is exactly the sort of thing someone looking at Kagi would probably want to avoid. They are also very expensive. They're one of those services that just assumes everyone is American so they just give a $ cost and don't specify beyond that, so I'm going to assume their prices are in USD which means a plan for my dad and myself is $21CAD a month. That absurdly overpriced for a search engine subscription.

To put that into perspective: A YouTube premium family plan covers up to 6 accounts and is the same price and includes unlimited video and music streaming. Thoughts about YouTube aside and looking at this from a pure value perspective, paying that same price just for a search engine is a godawful shit deal. Do you know what my email costs per month? $1.25CAD

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you want the meta search functionality, you should try out SearXNG, which is basically self hosted poor man's Kagi lol

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It really isnt anywhere near Kagi in search quality or results. I think its important to be honest here. If you dont want to pay to search, fine, but you will get much worse results.

Could be fine for your usecase though. Maybe you only search for major sites.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I stopped paying for Kagi a few years ago when they decided to introduce even more AI features than they had at the time. So I now run my own SearXNG instance. Fast, good and no AI in it. Just search results.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not paying for a search engine. Duck Duck Go for everyday usage. Yandex when I'm looking for media.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Yeah, no way do I need another subscription in my life when there’s a suitable substitute.

[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 16 points 2 days ago

I tried it, paid for it, cancelled it. I tested it with the same queries with ddg, startpage, brave, and qwant via 4get. The results were essentially the same. Kagi did provide more context in the description of the results but it wasn't anything I would pay a premium for. the majority of features I just didn't use, the assistant and fastgpt were a waste, lenses were fine and having fediverse on by default is neat but nothing I'd call home about.

If it were cheaper sure, I might stick with it but I can't justify the price to anyone wanting to use a search engine. $5 for 300 searches a month is a joke. I also don't like the fact that if you want to pay with something other than a credit card (paypal, venmo, etc) you get charged extra cause Kagi doesn't want to eat the fees. Also there's zero option to opt out of paying for the "AI" features, you can turn them off sure...but you're still going to pay for them.

If your internet usage consists of constant searching and LLM use for searching then sure, you're going to be paying $10+ a month and be happy with it. But there was nothing Kagi offered that knocked my socks off. if anything, felt like I was getting scammed.

[–] LunchEnjoyer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Highly recommend giving this blog post that takes a little bit of a deep dive into Kagi.

https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/doubting-your-favorite-web-search-engine/

(Not scary url, just punycode) 👍

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The author surely likes that the mascot is a dog. It feels more of a read and analysis of the terms of use than a deep dive of the tool but it was a good reading and I liked the suggestions.

I also liked the "reminder".

Edit: you should share this in some community as a post, every time I see this kind of website (pure content no-nonsense) it is shared is in the comments. 15 years ago this kind of stuff was easy to find, but nowadays, I only see them in comment sections. Even the search engine recommended around here would list a bunch of junk in the first pages.

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They added AI which I thought was one of the main points of using an alternative search engine so you could get away from that nonsense?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I think that you submitted the wrong URL. The submitted URL just points to Kagi's home page (https://kagi.com/), not to an article talking about the Orion browser.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Notamoosen@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

I'm a fan. It took me a few weeks of properly rating (raising, lowering, and blocking) to get truly customized results. Once I did though, I found I'm able to research far faster than before. I've also become a fan of their AI assistant. It has multiple llm's to choose from and is more private than using them directly.

[–] padge@lemmy.zip 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Been using Kagi for over a year and it's gotten to the point where I forget I'm using it, which is peak search engine for me. Not sure I agree with their big new focus being AI and a browser, but as a $5/month search engine it's perfect.

[–] blicky_blank@lemmy.today 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I ran through the 300 query limit in about a day; $5 month isn't really practical imo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

I pay for it. Finding good results in the first page saves me time and I enjoy the optional AI filters and domain-based weighting.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Kagi gave me weird hype vibes like Private Internet Access. Very cult-sounding/ hard to tell what's a paid advert when everyone is so rabidly opinionated and it's a bit of a niche to begin with.

I've tried it since then and it's actually very good. I've used DuckDuckGo for years and 30% of my searches go to google for a second opinion. With Kagi, that number is more like 10-20%. It's designed with users in mind and actually helps you find things not by actively subverting your will, but my giving you tools to build better queries and better results.

I'm still trying to reconcile my thoughts about FOSS and such but the results are the closest I've found to early Google. I don't care much for AI, but I used it to accurately identify an unknown wire connector on a cable I found and the model of a keyboard someone was selling in classifieds and didn't actually list in the description (this one took a few tries).

I've decided for now I'm going to put them in the same category as some of the stuff Louis Rossman is involved in which also isn't the perfect FOSS licence though its in the direction of freedom.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

DDG was great, but it absolutely has gotten worse and now gives tailored results. If I search a random name I will get doctors and business people with that name in my area even with location turned off. I moved to qwant.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Yes, the intensified focus on duckAI and the worsening of search results are concerning for DDG. With that in mind, I trust them over Google/MS/etc. It's important to me that a search engine follows my instructions.

[–] specialwall@midwest.social 9 points 2 days ago

Personally, it's the only search engine I haven't wanted to get away from

Yes absolutely. The results are actually useful, they don't have an incentive to keep you from finding what you are searching for. There is way less copywritten content and if there is, you can just block it.

Whenever I have to go back to "free" alternatives I am shocked by how much worse it is.

[–] fleet@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I tried it, and liked it, but stopped using it based on cost. If it was open source or somehow contributed to the open web, I would continue paying for it.

I went searching for a new search engine. I tried SearXNG, but I wasn't impressed with the results. So now I use duckduckgo and ecosia, because if I have to indirectly use google, at least I can get some trees planted in the process.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

IIRC Ecosia and DDG use Bing as their backend, not Google.

[–] TechnoCat@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

With DuckDuckGo around it is hard to justify paying for Kagi personally.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I quite enjoy Qwant

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

... How did you mispell the name of the service in the thread title?

Aside from that: I think so, but you need to make that decision for yourself. There are a few demos that various influencers have made (I was sold by the one by Remap Radio... Fuck Capitalism, Go Home, and Pay For Google?) but what sold me is:

  1. I do a LOT of searching in any given month. I'll use an LLM based "engine" for quick factoids (we'll get back to that) but I really need the ability to search from my browser's address bar or the steam browser without having to wade through all the bullshit.
  2. I REALLY like that I can prioritize, deprioritize, and outright block sites. No need for a sketchy anti-fandom extension that tracks everything I do when I can just click the dots and say to never show me warframe.fandom ever again. Also it is useful for blocking the REALLY chuddy news sites and misinformation blogs
  3. Speaking of Steam. I can just grab/assemble my login-less search string and use that with Steam so that all my in-game searches use kagi with my token rather than dealing with raw dogging google.
  4. And as for that LLM? While I wouldn't pay for it on its own, I do like the kagi assistant. Mostly because it shows me what search strings it is running/emulating and gives me citations. So when it tells me that smallpox tastes savory, I can see how it came to that conclusion and even check if that is contradicted by the website it linked to

I have a lot of concerns with the techbro libertarian attitude of the company itself and am not really huge with where my money goes (in terms of API calls) but... I have a lot more concerns with google shoving and obfuscating gemini more every single day.

Do I like that I am paying for what should be a basic fundamental element of the internet? Of course not. But also... kagi's approach kinda feels like what searching always should have been since it lets me cut through the SEO bullshit so effectively. I doubt I would be paying for this if google et al hadn't all decided it was better to emphasize advertisements and LLMs over all else but... I also could see myself doing so with the right demo?

[–] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

I've been using Kagi for more than 2 years and I'm very happy with it. It gets me great results quickly and zero ads. Sometimes I use their AI to grab a bunch of data I'd have to collect myself.

My main complaint is grabbing images with them for specific resolutions they just give up or add AI slop at the end. To be very clear, it's amazing at finding 4k images 3840x2160. But if I flip that aspect ratio it starts to suck. That's like... Hella niche but still important to mention.

It's the best alternative I've found to the majority of options, besides self-hosting and I'm not doing that yet so I can't comment on if it's worth it or not.

[–] tedgravy@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago

Personally, Kagi is worth it for me because I've grown to rely on its features (lenses, domain ranking, Wolfram Alpha integration, fast response times), and I've not been able to get the same quality of results from free alternatives (SearXNG included).

That said, if you're not a heavy search user, or you're happy with the results from free search providers, then it probably won't be much use to you over something like DuckDuckGo.

Regarding the AI integrations, I've not found them intrusive personally. Admittedly, I like their (optional) translation tool and (also optional) quick answers even though they're both LLM-based.

load more comments
view more: next ›