this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
381 points (98.7% liked)

News

32974 readers
2994 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thursday marks the 30th day of the federal government shutdown and the American public has grown more concerned about the shutdown throughout the month and more disapprove of how Donald Trump is handling the federal government, according to an ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll conducted using Ipsos’ KnowledgePanel.

More Americans blame Trump and the Republicans in Congress than the Democrats for the shutdown, the poll finds.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 84 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (39 children)

I don't think the Republicans really honestly give a shit if more people blame them or not.

I also honestly don't think they intend to re-open the government anytime soon. Possibly ever.

They want Trump as a dictator, and they're basically getting what they want with this, likely eventually arguing that Trump has to make the decisions because congress "no longer works." They've always run on government not working and have spent the better part of fifty years working to make that a reality. Once the executive is the only branch of the government still functioning, they'll have what they want.

The longer it is shutdown, the more essential agencies that keep people accountable and keep the country actually running will be shut down as they funnel more money into ICE and the military, the more authority they can hand off to the Executive branch. They will keep the IRS at bare minimum, but now that they've given ICE carte blanche to access citizens' tax records, they will also use them to enforce tax code.

If people start rioting because of loss of services like SNAP, Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, all the better for them so they can institute the Insurrection Act. Expect the Pinkertons (who still exist and will just go back to their old ways) and ICE or the military shooting striking workers to come back en vogue.

Also it's clear that they're preparing to either royally fuck with the next election or just cancel it entirely.

As much as I want to believe there is a way out of this, we may already be out of political and legal options to stop this madness.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will be very unsurprised if they end up giving Blackwater a fucking enormous contract and then set them lose on the public. They have… shall we say, quite a track record in Iraq.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, the run up for ICE is too slow, and they're not coming out of the pipe willing to kill people. Blackwater and the various other mercenaries in the US (don't care what hairs you wanna split, they're mercenaries) absolutely are willing to massacre whoever so long as their paycheck cashes.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago

I shall serve the new Pacifica republic then o7

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I love how any given political poll shows that 15-20% of people live under a rock and have no perspective of a situation, yet simultaneously claim some degree of political affiliation.

Like, if the #1 pressing issue of the day is a “not sure how I feel about this” situation for you, why do you even bother with pretending to not be entirely apolitical? Were not asking how you feel about a local school district board race where nobody can remember the names of the candidates, or how you feel about the civil war in Sudan. Were talking about the government being shutdown over one single sticking point. If you cant wrap your mind around the “complexity” of that situation then why the fuck are you going out of the way to answer polls? What use are you to a pollster if you dont know how you feel about this basic situation?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 43 points 17 hours ago (12 children)

At this point, most Americans recognize that if Dems vote to end the shutdown, they are really surrendering health care for a large swath of American families. It will take 5 Dems to vote yes, and destroy American health care (making it worse than it already is). Any Dem that does that before this is resolved, should be officially primaried out of office.

Even many MAGAs see this, but are pretending to not see it, for the good of the party. But starting on Saturday, they will all have to come to grips with their new health care premiums, and most will realize that if the Dems vote Yes, those new high health insurance premiums become PERMANENT - and that is exactly what MAGA wants.

The Dems are winning the propaganda war for a change, and as of Saturday, they have the unassailable high ground to demand anything they want.

But what they will really do is eventually fold, thinking that if MAGA takes their health care away, they'll just fight for it back after they win in 2026 and 2028. Then they'll lose both of those elections to massive election fraud, that they will deny as hard as MAGA.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 34 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I get that politicians may get deadlocked, Belgium was almost 2 years without government not long ago.

But why does the US politicians deadlock impact public spending already allotted? Especially long running programs and public employees.

In the civilized world, budgets get extended until politicians manage to change it.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Here's the really bonkers thing: the actual budget is passed, they know exactly how much is meant for each agency. What's been held up is actually putting that money in the account and authotizing the spending of it. We could have combined the two, and appropriated money in the same act that budgeted it. But we separate them, on purpose, to give the politicians more steps to negotiate things.

As far as I can tell, we are the only large country that separates budgets and appropriations like this. In most other countries, failure to fully fund the government would be seen as a sign of weakness in the government. But here, we have one party whose core mission is to shrink the size of Federal government. Conservatives here think that failing to fund the government shows strength.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 8 points 14 hours ago

the actual budget is passed, they know exactly how much is meant for each agency. What's been held up is actually putting that money in the account and authotizing the spending of it

wow that’s actually wildly fucked

failure to fully fund the government would be seen as a sign of weakness in the government

in australia it’s not just a sign of weakness, it’s the end of your government. if you fail to pass a budget, basically the governor general (the crowns representative in australia) dismisses the government, appoints an interim government, and fresh elections are called as soon as possible

there are a few more options than this, but they all kinda amount to the same thing

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

Laws were changed back around the 80s (I believe) to create this pressure. It used to be that people would still get paid, but apparently that was too functional for us.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How is this the first I am hearing that Belgium was just open for the taking?

And isn't the deadlock not sposed to influence that like we're supposed to have money for SNAP to continue.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

In parliamentary systems, "not having a government" isn't as catastrophic as it sounds. It varies by country, but generally speaking the Executive and Legislative branches are run together. When there is a clear party majority in the Parliament, that party gets to pick all the heads of the executive branch. When there is not a clear majority, but a coalition of parties that make up a majority, they negotiate which party gets to head which department.

When there is not even that coalition, nobody will agree on those department heads. The departments don't grind to a halt in most cases. There are lower-level deputies who can take over day-to-day administration, and there are usually still funds available. But no big decisions can be made without the formal department head. It mainly runs in place. (And, without any majority in Parliament, odds are there are not any laws getting passed either).

In many countries, this condition of the Parliament existing with no governing majority can trigger a new election, so the Parliament can have a new chance to get out of its deadlock. Why was Belgium different? You'll have to ask a Belgian.

What is going on in the US is much different. We have a government in place, it just can't agree on funding executive agencies, and we have laws on the books that specifically restrict what agencies can do without funding. We could have structured things differently, but did not. Our politicians want this chaos, because they think they can gain politically from it.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No taxation without representation.

A shut down government isn’t representing anyone. So it should come out of taxes.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The explosive growth of gig jobs that count as contracted work that don't automatically take taxes out of pay may accidentally be the best way to achieve this.

Because if you work a traditional job, generally your taxes get pulled and sent to the Federal government automatically every paycheck unless you have asked for an amount to be withheld from that (and I don't actually know if you can withhold all your tax money from being taken out of paychecks or not).

There's also options like this that I found on (slight retch) reddit:

collapsed inline media

DISCLAIMER: This is not an endorsement to not pay your taxes. This is a thought experiment about how such a thing could be achieved.

[–] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Intriguing. Any tax pros willing to weigh in?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago

Interesting idea.

The book Rich Dad, Poor Dad was really influential in convincing people to start their own business, even if it was just a side business, in order to get the most tax benefits. His entire premise was that rich people do this stuff all the time, and the average person can tap into those same strategies, once they own a business to apply those strategies to.

[–] GaryGhost@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

It feels hopeless, the aca will just be refunded and ERs will be full of uninsured debt ridden sick people. I remember having to go through that, please not again

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

I think republicans don't care at all what the majority thinks. They understand fully that our Federal system is rigged from top to bottom to give rural landowners disproportional voting power. So you can just lie your ass off to the 30% of your base that is ride-or-die, and as long as that 30% happens to live in the right areas of the right swing states nothing else matters.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They’ll likely kick the can with a CR and they’ll do it all over again.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're talking about doing away with the filibuster, which would lower the number of votes they need.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Should have done it 30 years ago

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Continuing Resolution

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

eh my life experience has thought me that there is a fine line between polls and wishful thinking

load more comments
view more: next ›