this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
506 points (99.0% liked)

News

32540 readers
3495 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nearly a third of Americans – 30% – say people may have to resort to violence in order to get the country back on track, according to the latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll.

It’s a sharp rise from 18 months ago, when 19% of Americans said the same.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 221 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a horrific moment to see that people honestly believe that there’s no other alternative at this point than to resort to political violence.

I mean… is it? I think it’s pretty obvious in the context of the regime essentially giving itself carte blanch to perpetrate political violence on its desired scapegoats and opponents.

I’m frankly getting pretty fucking tired of people complaining about how this is a startling development and being shocked by what’s happening. They wrote a playbook back in 2019. They published it on the open internet. They said they would follow it. They are now following it. You are not allowed to be surprised by any of this.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 35 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

This country is BUILT on political violence. The revolutionary war. The civil war. Hundreds of thousands of people died in those conflicts. Only more recently have non-violent protests accomplished anything and that was only possible because of the more free atmosphere those wars established in this country. That freedom is now almost entirely gone. What choice do people have left?

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget the riots and strikes between 1900 and 1920 (or 30?).

Successful application of violence today is complicated by the sophistication of surveillance and the electronic, centralized distribution of money.

It's difficult to pull together a large enough coalition to be able to fight effectively because the process of finding those people is short circuited by early discovery.

Nonviolence is the only way until a large enough segment of the population is desperate enough to trigger action.

Before that happens, effective leaders must be found and a support network must be readied to go into action quickly to professionalize and unify it when it happens, but before that is used to manage nonviolent action..

[–] kozy138@slrpnk.net 11 points 8 hours ago

While I agree that non-violent is the way to go, I think we need to change our definition of "violence."

Property destruction should not be considered violent. Especially when precautions are specifically taken to ensure that no people were harmed during act of property destruction or sabotage.

On the other side of things, actions such as destroying wildlife habitat or polluting the air, water, and soil systems of the Earth should be considered "violence." It is violence towards all of humanity, and towards life itself.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

Incredibly recently. The Civil Rights movement included advocacy for political violence, and arguably one of the only reasons it worked was Malcolm X and the Black Panthers saying "hey here's our alternative if our nonviolent fight doesn't work, we're all strapped and willing to hand out more guns if shit requires it".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 103 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (8 children)

We need a general strike. The country would be brought to its knees if deprived of profit and labor. That tactic was extremely effective in Chile in 2019, and had they not fallen for the trick of liberal reform, they would've had a successful revolution on their hands with virtually no bloodshed.

If you aren't in a union, then please consider joining the IWW to unionize your workplace (bonus: you'll get higher wages, better benefits, and more time off if you succeed!) to strengthen a general strike if we finally manage to enact one (the UAW is planning one for May 1st 2028, but it could happen sooner)

And for our international friends, you should join one as well, as fascism is gaining momentum globally. If your country isn't listed below, just contact the IWW directly in the link above.

  • 🇦🇷 Argentina: FORA
  • 🇦🇺 Australia: ASF-IWA
  • 🇧🇷 Brazil: FOB
  • 🇧🇬 Bulgaria: ARS, CITUB
  • 🇩🇪 Germany: FAU
  • 🇬🇷 Greece: ESE
  • 🇮🇹 Italy: USI
  • 🇳🇱 🇧🇪 Netherlands & Belgium: Vriji Bond
  • 🇪🇸 Spain: CNT
  • 🇸🇪 Sweden: SAC
  • 🇬🇧 United Kingdom: UVW
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 30 points 10 hours ago (13 children)

Can you afford not to get paid for 2 weeks? If so you're in the minority. Most people can't. Not to mention they have kids they are worried about, medical conditions that they can barely afford even with insurance. Rising housing and grocery costs. Etc..

I'm not trying to be a downer. I would love to see this happen, but we need a "realistic" way to accomplish it, to convince a majority to participate.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 43 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Unions build up strike-funds with membership dues so that members can continue to receive a salary while striking, that's why unions are so essential for working class people to be able to flex their power non-violently.

Consider that Chile is a much less wealthy country than the US. but was able to successfully commit to a general strike for over a month.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Honest question, how much of the US population do you think is unionized? Without looking it up

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 27 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I'm familiar with the depressing statistic already, a little under 10%.

However, bear in mind that the majority of the most critical infrastructure for making profit, such as ports, trains, trucking, and medical care have the highest rates of unionized jobs, and would still be incredibly effective for a general strike (Generally only 3.5% of the population would need to participate to have a meaningful effect). Even with our abyssal rate of unionization, we still hold incredible leverage if we choose to use it.

The UAW has a general strike planned for May 1st 2028, which has real odds of working. Unfortunately it's still 2 years out, and by that time may be too late. I'm hoping it's moved up at some point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jabeez@lemmy.today 16 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Realistic way is people just drop out of consumer economy to the fullest degree possible for them. Cancel all unnecessary subscriptions, shop local for only necessities. Look how quickly Disney blinked just because of a wave of cancellations, now do that everywhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago

Wrong way of thinking, buddy boy.

If you can't afford to go without pay for 2 weeks now, then where do you think you'll be in 2 years time?

Act now while you're breathing, for the sake of being able to breathe.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 18 points 11 hours ago

This is the only path other than violence and just as likely not to happen.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I agree that a general strike is the absolute least that should be done. But a general strike would have to hit the ground with the EXPECTATION that it will get violent.

It's inevitable that Cheeto will try to use his jackbooted thugs to crack down hard, and taking it meekly and then hoping to sue over it later won't be an option.

When the MAGA S.A. come to put you down, they aren't going to stop. I'm not saying that the strikers should start violence. But go in eyes open with the understanding that a a certain point, you all are going to have to make the fuckers bleed because they won't think twice about doing it to you.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 60 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Gee, almost as if Russian propaganda is working.

Before the Civil War one politician opined that if a war started you'd be able to mop up all the blood spilled with one handkerchief.

Anyone who thinks a new fight will be any easier has probably never been in a real fight.

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 59 points 12 hours ago (10 children)

I don't think people realize that if a new US civil war kicked off the lines wouldn't be as clear as north vs south. this would be state vs state, city vs city, neighbor vs neighbor. you could draw lines in your god damn sub division/street.

And if it were alliances between states it would be a god damn logistical nightmare. Imagine California being allied with New York for example. or Hell Minnesota being allied with like Arizona or whatever. how do you move supplies, troops, and what have you between allied states when you got a shit ton of hostiles between the two.

Add to the fact that unlike the first civil war you now have US military bases all over the world. what happens when you got folks within the SAME base in the middle of Germany that suddenly don't "agree" with each other?

Cluster fuck is an understatement.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There'd also be a shit-ton of drone warfare. Thousands will die without ever seeing their killers face. It's also entirely possible AI will be bombing people and you'll basically be killed by an algorithm.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Lets also not forget cyberwarfare, ranging from external to internal sources, ranging from doxxing people to invented news events with AI gen/manipulated images/audio/video, all the way up to knocking out public infrastructure, locking down hardware of local gov / businesses / banks with ransomware, etc.

Random, unofficial people are capable of either most or all of that.

Oh and of course if shit really kicks off, other countries will probably do the CIA's signature move of funding arming and training various groups of people.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

It's also why we need to avoid violence and make the regime stumble into itself.

Which is why Chinese and Russia propaganda is attempting to stoke the fire (remember, they eliminated their opposition, so they don't have the same experience inciting violence and they think they do).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 14 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

I saw one dream map where Canada drops two tentacles; one reaches down through the West all the way to San Diego, and the Eastern one reaches just north of Washington.

Humor aside, I agree with your take. A war of assassins and terrorists on both sides.

I'll add one more note. Back in the day, the Irish Republican Army was the most feared underground in the world. They only had a handful of soldiers, but a superb organization. If a shooter was supposed to kill someone in Geneva, he'd have three or four cars waiting when he got to the airport, and each driver would know five places the shooter could stay. He'd have a choice of getaway drivers and extra safe houses and docotrs on tap.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DaMummy@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (43 children)

So which hashtag would you use to end slavery?

load more comments (43 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 50 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

This reflects a feeling of being backed into a corner. What else are we going to do when our political views and goals and ffs human beings are being criminalized? Every decent thing getting rolled back and every horrible thing dialed up to 11. Fuck republicans. One way or another they will regret this. Whether people vote them out or get violent with them remains to be seen but this will not last, obviously.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 hours ago (9 children)

I can't wait until the day that these filth learn that we outnumber them 10 to 1.

It's up to them how they learn this fact.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (9 children)

Sounds delusional to me.. if we outnumber them 10 to 1 why the fuck is a republican sitting on the highest seat in the country? Everyone just sat out the vote??? Okay. Then what the fuck do you expect them to do to republicans if they can’t even vote?

[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 8 hours ago

Collusion and deception

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Idiots got tired of not being allowed to be racist.

Harris was thoroughly unappealing to many, and the Democrats were masterfully outmaneuvered by the Republicans seeding shit about Gaza and rallying minorities against her.

In swing states there was definitely vote manipulation. You had Musk offering to pay people to vote.

I would say after the outcome of Project 2025, he's finally pissed off minorities and farmers, and business owners, now he's working on the military.

Now he's threatening to send the US military in against cities.

I think the only one delusional here is you. votes will tell eventually.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 42 points 12 hours ago (7 children)

This is just people waking up to reality. Trump has the White House, the senate, the House of Representatives, and the courts. He controls the military and has already begun deployment to "democratic" cities. His buddy in Texas is redistricting to help him consolidate power, and I am sure Abbot is not the only one. Every move Trump makes is designed to cripple opposition to his regime. Republican states are purging voter rolls and enacting bullshit laws designed to disenfranchise people of colour.

Milquetoast democrats have made only the most pathetic gestures of opposition to Trump. The first genuine thing Trump ever said was when he expressed surprise yesterday at how little resistance he has faced from the left. Republicans were right about one thing: the American left is a bunch of pussies.

If more Americans think political violence is the only way out of the mess Americans made, it's probably because they are starting to develop a vague but accurate understanding of what is happening in their country.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 41 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well if an ICE officer stops my husband based on his appearance we’ve both agreed that we should resist that arrest.

That would end in violence and probably our deaths. What else can we do? Let them take us god knows where?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 38 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You can't vote your way out of fascism. Trump already launched an insurrection to hold on to power. He won't let it go now that he's better entrenched.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 7 hours ago

"Those who make peaceful reform impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 5 hours ago

Well it's true. You can't be diplomatic with fascists. You can't "get on the same level" with billionaires.

They have no reason to listen or care, unless we give them a reason to listen or care.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Violence is how we beat the Nazis the first time. If there's a cleaner option that's actually feasible, then yes please... but failing that, cutting the head off the snake is a pretty tried and true method. And if it grows back, cut that one off too - they'll get the message eventually.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

Exactly. Ultimately these people don't actually believe in anything other than power. Their arguments are in bad faith. Any compromise is just a temporary weigh station as they prepare to push even harder.

How did compromising with the right work for abortion? Parental consent laws became onerous clinical regulations became bans on performing procedures became making getting an abortion legally murder. How did compromising on trans rights go? A few "reasonable concerns" about girl's sports became blanket bans on sports became bans on life-saving care for minors became restrictions on basic ID documents became attempts to criminalize the very existence of trans people. This isn't slippery slope conjecture; it's directly observed history.

The simple awful truth is that we have fundamentally incompatible visions of the world. They see The Handmaid's Tail as an ideal to aim for. They think the literal God of the universe wants them to create this nightmare. And with God at their backs, they can justify any evil to create their warped utopia. Any action can be justified. Any lie can be excused. Any suffering by any number of people now can be balanced against the perfect lives they imagine we'll all live once they force us all into their dream world. The worst thing about them, is that they actually think they're the good guys.

This is the fundamental problem. Their vision of an Earthly paradise is our vision of Hell on Earth. We have fundamentally different visions for the future. They cannot convince the majority of the population to willingly create their vision. So they have to resort to violence, disenfranchisement, propaganda, and fraud. (All justified for the greater good.) And ultimately we're going to have to use every tactic they use and more if we want to keep these monsters from turning our nation into Gilead.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 12 hours ago

Is killing people that are openly declaring that they want to kill you even "political violence"? I would say it is not, because at that point you are not going after them because of their affiliation with any political party, but because they are trying to kill you.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 26 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

On track to what ..for fuck sakes?

[–] sadfitzy@ttrpg.network 22 points 12 hours ago

Reclaiming what has been stolen from the working class since Reagan.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 24 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."

  • Thomas Jefferson, President of the United States, c. 1787

Not that I think political violence (or violence of any sort, for that matter) should be our first, second, or even thirty-fifth resort, but at a certain point I think one must come to grips with the fact that - whether it fits in with their delicate sensibilities or not - when confronted with an existential peril it does sometimes become necessary to defend oneself. (Fun fact: This is why self-defense can be presented as a valid defense against murder charges!)

Sure, we should absolutely make any and all attempts to be inclusive (Republicans HATE this!) and tolerant (GOP: hiss IT BURNS!) and attempt to reach solutions through education, research, negotiation, compromise and all that lovely (woke?) stuff, but... For some reason, it seems like there's consistently only one side that ever shows up to the table willing to actually do any of that. And that's just how it's been for fucking DECADES now. There's probably a lot of you (just generally speaking, not necessarily meaning Lemmy's demographic per se) who aren't even old enough to remember a time before the GOP began using "government shutdowns" and "debt ceilings" and "literal fucking coup attempts" as part of their standard, day-to-day politicking. Believe it or not (and I know this will probably be the hardest one to buy, but I swear it to be true) there was a time when the Republicans would - even if they WERE NOT in power at the time - STILL SHOW UP AND DO THEIR FUCKING JOBS. I know, what a concept, eh? Imagine going to work every day and just... doing your job, like a fucking idiot, instead of throwing absolute meltdown tantrums over your lack of control over other people's genitals.

Does any of this strike you as the behavior of (an) entity(ies) engaging in anything even remotely resembling something that could be construed as "good-faith negotiation" - let alone even approaching something as audacious as "compromise?" This isn't a willing, eager party to an arbitration, quite, is it? No... Something more akin to an assailant with a knife at our throat(s) demanding to inspect our genitals to make sure we're where they think we should be at the moment certainly sounds more apt to me...

I don't want there to be violence. Any. At all, really. But at what point does the moral imperative toward nonviolence get outweighed by the moral obligation to the people being kidnapped by masked (supposed) government agents and disappeared to very real, literal concentration camps? How many genocides at once do we need to hit the tipping point where it's finally acceptable to stand up and say, "That's enough. This far. No farther." But actually back that up, for a change.

If that means by force, then unfortunately, so be it. Might doesn't make right, but that certainly doesn't preclude it from enforcing it, does it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago

John Brown was right.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Soap box, ballot box, ammo box. They're trying to take away the 1st 2, so...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

Unfortunately that appears to be the only way to get rid of them. They continually ignore the established laws and protests and " sternly worded emails/letters/phonecalls.

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

PBS running these insipid polls lately is so fucking offensive.

Americans are already doing violence on Americans to execute their fascist vision of this country, en masse, within and without institutions. Violent change is here. The violence question is over. Public opinion is for TV.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

As always, Republicans lead the pack, with more Republicans supporting political violence than Democrats. The scary part is how much the Democrat statistics have gone up, and the fact they're getting close to the levels of support seen in Republicans

America is fucked up. I don't have a solution, just pointing out the sad state of affairs

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

Things always go to shit when the wealth divide gets too big. People and companies shouldnt be big enough to own the government. The last time this happened was the guilded age in the 20s which led to the crash. who knows where this one will lead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Beebabe@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I have become worried I’ll need to defend myself against violent republicans because they are always talking about and actively hurting others.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

That’s just people who admit it out loud. I know a few people who hint at this too but are afraid to say it out loud, especially if they have an Alexa-type device.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

The Rest of The World: “duh!”

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Pick up a history book.

Fascists don't allow fair elections.

Fascists don't stop when asked politely.

Unfortunately, that 30% is correct.

Arm yourselves and everyone you know. Form networks. Communicate via encrypted messaging apps.

load more comments
view more: next ›