Great job, the system is broken as fuck anyway. The fact that he used AI to do it is the karmic cherry on top! Ideally, you should be able to run the model on the cloud of the company you're interviewing for, just as an extra 'fuck you'.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 31 points 3 days ago

Companies are already resisting because they can't figure out a good way to interview people. "We tried nothing and are all out of ideas". Hopefully more companies like Fuck Leetcode pop up to force a change in interview techniques.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cheating leetcode interviews with AI doesn't seem that innovative to me, just adding dishonesty to a broken practice. Destruction is always easier than creation.

Also, as someone who frequently designs and runs SW interviews, it's totally possible to run interviews that test actually important SW skills like OO design, error handling, and using APIs, which AIs still fail handily.

If you want to do something cool, make an AI to refactor your codebase for maintainability and security.

[–] sirdorius@programming.dev 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You seem completely detached from the grueling experience of being interviewed, so it's unsurprising that you don't understand why somebody would want to burn this whole thing down.

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I do do interviews too. It's a lot of time and work. A well designed interview can and should be a realistic, rewarding problem solving session where you get to try out collaboration with potential colleagues.

[–] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hehehehehe You said, "do do". That sounds like doo-doo which is poop. 😜

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 24 points 3 days ago

You're hired.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

No.

They said do do. That should sound like doo-doo which might be poop.😜