Yeah. You weren't given what you needed, from laziness, ineptitude or hubris. Not your fault. If you had a set of caregivers that didn't give up you wouldn't have went to that place. Places like that aren't better because they are just a step above the effort the primary caregivers are providing. It's allowed because of money, religion, and propaganda.
bane_killgrind
So the wealthy are increasingly scrambling for ways to differentiate themselves from the plebs.
The Internet shot education disparities in the foot, along with equal access measures. Looks and fashion are meaningless, because the first point means that personally made, bespoke items can be very high quality. Health can be maintained very cheaply, with the right knowledge.
So they are frustrating access to education and preventative health measures like vaccines and fluoride.
That poor chair
Yeah sure, but when do you stop gathering regularly constructed data, when your goal is to grab as much as possible?
Markov chains are an amazingly simple way to generate data like this, and a little bit of stacked logic it's going to be indistinguishable from real large data sets.
Over 60, yeah people let themselves go
Since Amazon commingled stock, you can't know if the electronics you are getting are knock offs, tampered with, Or a brick in a box.
Keep your money for local businesses.
Is it? You were asked your opinion, and your answer was extremely general and flat wrong.
You were corrected about plugins, they have an annoyed tone in the post because you have a strong opinion based on seemingly nothing.
I guess I'm saying, you should stand by your words better or something?
I just got here, I don't think the other dude was being sneaky
Yeah I get that it's bad to just say "they are being lazy" but this kind of thinking is just lazy.
Like sure you can just work the line, but if you don't understand any of the theory behind your work product or how to accomplish your same work product despite different tooling, you are just making yourself less competitive and more exploitable. Most other professionals know how to cut their project down to the minimum viable product, there's nothing special about working with graphics.
Eh it's reasonable to think you had some specific opinions, but you only have one point that Photoshop has something gimp doesn't.
You seem dismissive and not unbiased when you are so general about things.
The progression of a slow decline in competency?