FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 2 days ago

I bet you some do!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

i bet you some do!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

US law is an interesting response to an ethics question

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 13 points 6 days ago

The problem with only counting calories for health has never been more aptly highlighted!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

as does the same amount of any other substance, including for example yoghurt.

That number is just the E in E=mc²

If we are actually talking dietary calories, the number you see on foodstuff packaging, plutonium has 0.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago

when comparing to kg I will assume the mass unit, since comparing a mass value to a force has no meaning.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 1 week ago

when compared to a value in Kg, the only logical interpretation is the mass pound. If it were lbf, the si unit conversion would be Newtons.

Having the same name for two different, but easily mixed up units is really annoying haha

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago

The bar is defined to be close to the atmospheric pressure of one random planet called earth, why choose that as your pressure unit?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

isn't that lbf?

The pund itself is defined as 0.45359237 Kg

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

huh?

Mass doesnt change with gravity

view more: next ›