this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
348 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
3175 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Squiddork@lemmy.world 255 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So they found Google guilty of monopolistic practices then agreed to do nothing about it.

Sounds about right.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Welcome to the capitalistic oligarchy!

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

it's not even close to being over yet

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 113 points 3 months ago (3 children)

How disappointing but expected. I'm not even sure what would break googles search engine dominance outside of search engines becoming obsolete. I use DDG and I find it to be better than google but still so many people stand by google search with strong loyalty.

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago (7 children)

I very much dislike Google but constantly search stuff on DDG, with little to no success. Then I’ll add !g to the front, and a decent chunk of the time what I’m looking for is top 3, not including all the sponsored shit.

Are there specific ways you search for DDG to be better?

[–] Lag@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

I've had the exact opposite experience for the past year. I had to switch the default to DDG at work where I need to search for specific model numbers every day. I don't remember the last time I actually Googled something on the PC or phone (Firefox search bar with DDG default). I only use Google for maps where it's always been the best.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The only time I ever need to use a google bang is when im searching for something specifically local like a restaurant. DDG uses apple maps and apple maps is complete garbage.

When I cant find something on DDG and I use the !g 99% of the time I cant find it on google either.

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Funny how experiences can be so different. I find Apple Maps much better than Google maps.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Exactly why the freedom for users to choose between different software is so important :)

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Try search aggregators, at least the fingerprint won't be attached to you (with some at least)

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

It really seems to depend on the topic. I would say, on average DDG is better from my experience. However, when it doesn't work it really doesn't work. Google usually has something you want fairly early in the results.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Never heard of it! I’ll check it out

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I moved to DDG because I felt Google results were getting worse. You would search for something specific and instead just get varying degrees of the same article on different sites about it instead.

Then I felt DDG was getting worse in just not always getting what was related, so I've moved to qwant.

Other than not always getting geo-related results, the results have been the best I've seen in a while so I've stuck around for now.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Same. Ddg can't find shit.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Barring them from offering exclusive deals, which allows competitors to get in the mix at places like Mozilla.

I did not come up with this idea, this was one of the remedies the Judge chose. @Squiddork@lemmy.world Telling them to drop Chrome was just flashy talk.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I dont think that would help because chrome would offer good by default and apple would offer chrome by default for the "best experience" and they dont need the money. Then alternative browsers with an already low market share would get paid less to offer other search engines. Its risky to ship a non google search by default.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Oh come on now. All of the strong options would have worked. Don't let Google buy its competition off. Don't let Google buy it's default position. Don't let Google control the browser. That's it, problem solved.

You claim people are loyal, but if that were true, the aforementioned payoffs would not exist.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 101 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Google should lose control of Android. Maybe then we'll keep the ability to install any app we want.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You think other companies would provide sideloading like samsung, and oneplus? They would lock the OS hard and make it difficult to even unlock. Making android more closed than before.

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well then why aren't they doing so now? They're already maintaining their own forks of android, should be pretty trivial to do.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They need to maintain compatibility with play services to access apps on play store.

Also, starting with OnUI 8 bootloader unlocking is no longer supported. On OxugenOS 16 its only allowed with restrictions. The hardening is already started.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

allowing 3rd party app installs is not required for play services

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I never said it was. Not sure what you mean.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I highly doubt AOSP can't mantain itself, and that manufacturers could build from it and do whatever.

[–] lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It'd probably take some sort of Linux Foundation style arrangement with manufacturers supporting a neutral team built from Google's Android division.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Google needs the AT&T treatment. And while we're at it give AT&T the AT&T treatment

[–] db2@lemmy.world 77 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Completely expected. Google paid the protection money.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (3 children)

With reports of Elon Musk eying to buy Chrome or OpenAI… sorry but I believe this was the best outcome, what we need is people using more Firefox that is one of the few non-Chromium browser out there.

[–] ATPA9@feddit.org 14 points 3 months ago

Yeah, i had the same thoughts. The current chrome is better than the "Hitlerdidnothingwrong AI-First" browser those goons would have cooked up...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But he did...bar the search giant from making exclusive deals to distribute its search or AI assistant products in ways that might cut off distribution for rivals.

Oh boy there goes Firefox

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah its just the default search engine and you can still change the default, thus not cutting off distribution of other engines.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I think they're referring to Firefox's funding, a lot of which was through search deals

An article from 5 years ago: https://www.pcmag.com/news/mozilla-signs-lucrative-3-year-google-search-deal-for-firefox

edit: seems like that hasn't changed by this ruling either

United States District Judge Amit Mehta has ruled that Google can continue to pay other companies, including browser makers like Mozilla, to be their default search engine.

https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/09/google-antitrust-ruling-firefox-search-deal

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

From the article you linked:

In return for Google being the default search engine in Firefox, Mozilla is expected to bank $400M+ a year.

Literally what I am talking about. I can still switch away from the default. No other search companies are being denied access to being set as the default search engine in Firefox. Google just pays a premium so they are the default out of the box, which would not be anti-competitive under this order.

bar the search giant from making exclusive deals to distribute its search or AI assistant products in ways that might cut off distribution for rivals.

This by definition does not cut off their distribution in Firefox. Google can still make this deal with Mozilla. It is not an exclusivity deal, it's a default search engine deal. Exclusivity or cutting off distribution would be making Google the only search engine option in Firefox.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/09/google-antitrust-ruling-firefox-search-deal

United States District Judge Amit Mehta has ruled that Google can continue to pay other companies, including browser makers like Mozilla, to be their default search engine.

I see, I'll edit my other comment. So what even changes then, were they even making exclusive deals in the past? The discussion I remember was about how being the default made it difficult for others to compete since most people don't change the defaults.

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think that was mainly solved (here in the EU at least) by requiring a choice of search engine when first opening a browser.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 3 months ago

I don't remember this being enforced.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago

I’m questioning why they would make such a lucrative deal with Mozilla in the future, now that antitrust is just a front for government extortion

[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Thank you for clarifying.

[–] Tortellinius@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Who cares about chrome? Of all the things Chrome is the easiest to replace. Android is the real deal.

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 months ago

No one saw that coming

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 13 points 3 months ago
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 8 points 3 months ago

Just don't do it again mmmkay?

[–] Mad__vegan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm on ecosia with okay search results. Sadly if I know it exists but still having problems I resist to Google but Supposedly ecosia plants trees with some of the revenue

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›