someguy3

If you think/feel antagonized, that's telling.

virtue signal.

I wonder how you would classify their action of protest non voting lol. Ciao.

I'm telling them to vote. This is inane, ciao.

The ICE agents claimed they were looking for someone else entirely when they entered the family home -- but they chose to detain the two anyways.

In case anyone has any doubt what the intentions of all this are. PeterGriffinOkNotOk.jpg

“You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin. And then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities,” Ehrlichman said. “We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

Interesting thought but I can't see it.

Park moved to the U.S. from Seoul when he was 7 years old and had legal permanent residency under a green card.

he suffered from severe PTSD. He turned to marijuana to cope with nightmares and sensitivity to loud noises and moved to Hawaii in 1995 for a better lifestyle. But he became addicted to crack cocaine and struggled for years to get clean.

Crack led to prison led to revoked green card.

Lol you're still on the blame strawman. Again, I am informing protest- non-voters what they voted for. That you keep trying to strawman this hard even after being corrected is funny. Ciao.

Who's bitching? I am informing protest-non-voters what they voted for.

Who said I'm blaming? I'm informing protest-non-voters what they voted for. Honestly, that you feel/think blame is telling.

I disagree!!!

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

People facing denaturalization get no free lawyer, meaning poor defendants often face the government alone. There’s no jury trial — just a judge deciding whether someone deserves to remain American. The burden of proof is lower — “clear and convincing evidence” instead of “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Most important, there’s no time limit, so the government can go back decades to build cases.

The British government said it would retain its 10.89% stake in Eutelsat, which competes with American billionaire Elon Musk's Starlink.

In a written statement to parliament, the government said its investment was driven by three factors: improving national security, boosting Britain's role in the low Earth orbit market and strengthening the domestic space sector.