this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9197 readers
3258 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brianary@startrek.website -1 points 9 months ago

If voters bear no responsibility, do you really believe in democracy, or are you thinking about this as an issue to be solved by authority?

The self-righteousness of this discussion is a problem. Politics requires some humility, which we seem to be short of.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Perfection is the enemy of progress.

I can tell that many people in these comments have given up on every artistic skill they've ever tried to learn because their attempts were never good enough right out of the gate.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Great way to put it. People use the excuse of bad candidates to dodge personal responsibility and duty. Also the people complaining about candidates are very rarely doing anything about it or stepping up, they just sit at home and wait for it to just materialize

[–] schema@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

It's kinda crazy to me that a sizable amount of people expect a perfect completely spotless candidate, or they don't vote and hand over the win to fascism.

In a rational world, Harris would have won without even doing a single rally, because the alternative is Trump and his cronies.

People generally don't realize that the only way to get an option to the left of the democrats is if Republicans no longer win elections. But with each "punishment", voters give the democrats, the Republicans' grip on power gets tighter and tighter, with more cronie judges, more gerrymandering, more voter purges, more ID rules, and more propaganda.

So, are the voters, or rather those who didn't vote, wrong? Fuck yes, for the reason that because of them, we now have Trump as the US president rather than him going to prison like he deserves. Of course they are wrong. How is that even a question?

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

People generally don't realize that the only way to get an option to the left of the democrats is if Republicans no longer win elections.

Absofuckinglutely wrong. The number of Democrats still buying this bullshit is astounding. THIS is why you lose so damn much.

No Democratic candidate has had more support from right leaning voters than Bernie Sanders in the last 30 years. Explain that with your model. It's not just about some smooth gradient from left to right and capturing the middle. We are in a populist age. The people are totally fed up with the status quo.

It's disruptors that win, not whomever captures the center of a spectrum that only policy wonks even care about. Anyone who's chief concern is left vs right is already a decided voter.

[–] schema@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Way to miss the point. Against Trump, it shouldn't matter who the other candidate is. A fucking bucket of snails could have been candidate and I'd vote for it over it over fascism.

this is why you lose so damn much

"This candidate isn't left enough for me. By not voting I essentially vote for fascism". That is why democrats lose.

Would a more left leaning candidate have more chances? Maybe? No matter what, should it have mattered if the alternative is Trump? Absolutelyfucking not, but apparently it does.

[–] LostMyRedditLogin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Good luck with shaming people into voting for you. It didn't work in 2016 and it didn't work now. Letting the DNC off the hook won't change anything.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Little bit of A, lotta bit of B.

Trump was the most garbage candidate in every way in the history of our country.

He basically coasted to victory.

Double-standards for days.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If candidate 1 is garbage, and candidate 2 loses to candidate 1, what does that say about candidate 2?

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That the voters are braindead

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Yep. Garbage in, garbage out.

Idiocracy is a documentary.

Though I'll say it shouldn't come as a surprise that voters vote against their own interests when the waters of truth are so muddied by the rich and powerful.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If Kamala was a garbage candidate, what does that make Trump?

For bonus points, how is it not the voters fault considering any rational answer to the above question? You may open your book to look up topical issues like peace, climate, genocide, rights, hate, juvenile bullying, criminal bullying, felony conviction, bigotry (don't miss misogyny relating to to "garbage candidate", see above), and tariffs.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

If Kamala was a garbage candidate, what does that make Trump?

47th President of the USA?

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

what does that make Trump?

The 47th POTUS.

topical issues like peace, climate, genocide, rights, hate, juvenile bullying, criminal bullying, felony conviction, bigotry

Every single one of those issues was put to measure last week and came up short to "the economy." Idpol has been the Dem's running charge since Occupy and has netted them exactly (1) election since Obama's win as incumbent. It's just not the winning strategy in national elections.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Turns out, lecturing the voters doesn't make them want to vote for you. Everything you said is correct, but those weren't the concerns that resonated. To quote Bill Clinton's strategist in 92, "it's the economy, stupid." Yeah, the economy is doing great right now, but you have to ask, "for who?"

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Unpopular opinion: Kamala was a solid candidate.

Biden was headed to a humiliating defeat. Another couple debates, and maybe he loses NY and CA and we have a Dukakis- or Mondale-level annhilation. Kamala stepped in and ran a solid campaign on very short notice. Trump didn't even have time to come up with a good nickname for her! She kicked his ass in their only debate, and he was literally too scared to do it again.

In the end, she lost by a couple hundred thousand votes in 3 states. She was wrong about Gaza and the economy, but PA, MI, and WI are credibly winnable in future elections. Kamala was not a garbage candidate.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I hope you realize this but Harris ended up in a humiliating defeat.

[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, yes. Kamala was the way better choice of the two. Biden kinda fell off for me the moment he did the railroad strike stuff.

But I'm not living in the US, so my point is kinda moot.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

Biden got those striking workers everything they wanted. He just didn't scream about it like Trump would have, which was a huge mistake.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Cool, so, we'll see the voters in the primaries going forward, right? Unlike in 2016 and 2020, when they nominated said garbage candidates?

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If the only reason you voted for trump as a form of ‘punishment’ towards dems, then yea that is on the voters. You should be voting for what helps you. Not to be a petty idiot.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So the action plan is what? Cull the voters? Breed better voters?

The first job of a politician is to reach and convince voters. Harris had a billion dollars and didn't do it. Yes, the voters made bad choices, but blaming the voters is not a way forward. There is no escaping that we have to figure out what Harris could have done better. More precisely, shitlibs need to figure it out because progressives already know and have been screaming it from the rooftops for decades.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

“Jill made bad choices. I blame Bob because he didn’t convince Jill to make a good choice.”

This is such circular fucking reasoning. Apparently it’s literally impossible for a voter to make a stupid decision, because all blame will circle back to the candidate for “Not being convincing enough”.