Your "proof" is that there isn't a position that will win approval with everyone?
brianary
joined 2 years ago
That, and Troy McClure's house. 😄
This would be better with a more accurate projection, like Dymaxion. That black area is so much bigger than it looks here.
You get used to it sooner than you'd think. There are libraries to convert between regex and English. Maybe it deserves a Unicode code block like APL?
Not something I've encountered.
Wait until you see what they do to avoid learning SQL or Regex or JSON Pointer or XPath.
If you want everything bundled instead of à la carte, that sounds more like eclipse to me. But then, I don't understand how anyone can program in Java.
I think that aphorism is about authority-respect rather than basic-human-decency-respect.
This thread makes me wonder how much contemporary American English is to blame for people being able to exploit ambiguities surreptitiously. Dog whistles have to start somewhere, they don't seem to be prearranged.
I think the rationale is that, when it's a single individual, they can't pass the buck or blame the group. It's a final appeal at a human level.
The trick is not electing a troll.
Calling well-earned criticism of economics anti-intellectualism is using the composition/division fallacy.
Most people's lives have been affected for decades by Chicago School of Economics voodoo nonsense, that's where much modern criticism is aimed.
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth_in_a_Time_of_Debt
• https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/jul/11/how-economics-became-a-religion
It's this: https://www.newsweek.com/james-comey-deletes-post-depicting-8647-after-backlash-online-2073031
James Comey posted a picture of "8647" (get rid of Trump) spelled in shells.
view more: next ›
LD and SNW are easily some of the best Trek series.
How would TNG have fared if people dipped out at ep 2?