this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
522 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

24155 readers
1994 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
522
centerDiv.js (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 67 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)
div {
  display: grid;
  place-content: center;
}

We've come a long way...

The collective man-hours this would have saved people, if we had it back in 1999, would be staggering.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You misspelled nesting tables

[–] washbasin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

My man right here. Y'all ever want to code some HTML emails? Nested tables as far as the eye can see!

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That was wonderful, thank you for sharing. When it's done well, I really enjoy this style of prose.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had to resize my browser window in order to read that how dare you not simply read my mind and select my preferred column width instead

99% of users, probably

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You can't just hold control and scroll the mouse wheel?

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I don't like reading big text. I'd rather have small text in a smaller area

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

I'm totally going to bookmark this & also I'm going to insert this as well. https://www.htmlhobbyist.com/

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Oh yes please. But not JavaScript. I use Rust frameworks to avoid all three!

[–] pewpew@feddit.it 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Eww Rust! I hate memory safe languages, I love torturing myself with C

[–] sevon@lemmy.kde.social 9 points 1 day ago

You can wrap everything in unsafe and keep living dangerously!

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bricklove@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Knew someone would say that, lol, gold project, sad that it's gone unmaintained and my man started working on home-manager at home
..wait

Yeah I gotta get my workplace to get on board with it. Rust->Webasm is simply amazing

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

Flutter like a butterfly, sting like a Dart.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I worked with some pretty dumb people who mocked me for years as the guy who couldn't design a UI to save my life because the product I inherited was designed by someone in the 1990s. it wasn't pretty but it was functional.

any time a UI request came in for the new product and I would try to take it, the PM would pull it and give it to someone else. "oh, their skillset is better suited for UI/UX." I was told.

I got fed up with it and designed my online portfolio. used it to showcase my work and skills even documented my process from mockups to design iteration and final products.

I then posted on linkedin my new portfolio and listed myself as open to connect. within a day the PM made a point to pull up my portfolio on standup and asked me where I got the template. told them, "no template. as you can see in the documentation I designed it from scratch using HTML5 CSS3 and JavaScript. I also included the js packages I used."

they were stunned and immediately started to shuffle some UI tickets my way. I just said, "sorry, my skillset is better served for backend requests."

I quit two months later after a few interviews that seemed to go well. I hated that shithole.

moral of the story? don't discourage people from taking on tasks they aren't obviously suited for. they might just surprise you.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I agree with your final take, but why would you want to take frontend tickets if you can also do backend work?

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Raw spite. If you're upset enough to build a whole LinkedIn profile, you've already mentally moved on to the next company.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

With me too, my employer has to start worrying once I put my current position into my linkedin profile.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

change of pace, mostly. I also like the challenge. when I'm not challenged at work I lose interest easily and can spiral into not doing my job. so it's nice to break up a long running project with some new bugs or tasks that are unrelated.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

JavaScript frameworks are invented because pure HTML and CSS suck for dynamically loaded pages, and vanilla JavaScript suck in general.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most pages don’t need dynamic loading.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

My menus need to be dynamically reloaded!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago

Dynamically loading pages suck too.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

JavaScript frameworks actually exist for two reasons, one, vanilla JavaScript lacks ease of use (does not suck and I don't care who disagrees) and two, people love over engineering the fuck out of technology. See: technology since the iPhone came out. We have advanced systems around the world spinning up processes to make up for the fact that touch screens are hard to type accurately on.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

jQuery got popular because Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and other browsers weren’t exactly cross compatible. Writing vanilla JS was risky business in that sense.

It also supported AJAX across all major browsers, which meant the website could make API requests without reloading the entire page. It was super revolutionary to press a button and it only changed a part of the page.

Then Angular and React took it a step forward and that’s where we are now.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am very aware of the progression. But you're vastly glossing over how much complexity (and feature set) was added after jQuery. If JavaScript sucks, how would you change it? Shitty browsers implementing it poorly in the past (and safari doing so today) doesn't make it suck.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

people love over engineering the fuck out of technology

Exhibit A: 2.85 Million packages, as of mid-2023

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Unless those are mostly overly complicated, it doesn't speak to what I'm saying. But I guess it means people like doing their own engineering better than relying on others

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Immediate mode rendering and components seem to be why people use them. And you know what? The web should natively support those but doesn't (well it kinda bad components, but ehhh). Otherwise I agree, the frameworks are overcomplicated.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's still Javascript.

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OP, I don't think you've correctly linked to the post (when I visit the linked webpage, the browser tries to download an ActivityPub activity instead of showing the post in the Mastodon web UI). Please replace the link with this one.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

got it, my bad

real ones learn dhtml

[–] brianary@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait until you see what they do to avoid learning SQL or Regex or JSON Pointer or XPath.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 18 hours ago

Ugh, i've had to write some Selenium tests where I had to come up with weird ass Xpaths because not a single fucking element had an ID and over half would spawn something in a different div

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Wait until you see when they refuse to learn anything but SQL.

[–] brianary@startrek.website 1 points 5 hours ago

Not something I've encountered.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

I was so pleased when a brief for a thing at work was "no frameworks".

React sucks and is way way way overdone and ill die on that hill

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Damn that's some spicy takes lol.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use plain HTML along tachyons.io, it's pretty neat.

[–] Biyoo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

On mobile the header has overlapping content- not the worst but shows very little attention to detail for a CSS toolkit :(

load more comments
view more: next ›