this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16700 readers
218 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Both are fair and valid.

Peaceful science & good housing should go hand in hand.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Okay, so now you can barely afford your rent inside a black hole. Enjoy the enhanced granularity of your desperation!

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That would explain why it feels like my bank account is being sucked dry.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fortunately the universe can get Cosmic Overdraft Protection, for only a small annual fee and 23 squillion bazillion stomptillion dollars per occurrence.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And since you're in a black hole with your unaffordable rent, you can't escape it!!!

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Fuck that's funny!

[–] peregrin5@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

paying rent sometimes feels like throwing money into a black hole

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The same for mortgages too really. All these people out there toting new construction and how it’s good for property values seem to forget that higher property values means 1) higher property taxes, and 2) higher priority values, for when you sell your home and need to buy a new one.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not to mention mortgage rates are so damn high that your mortgage payment is basically like paying rent to the bank because you're barely touching the principal on the loan

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Therefore your landlord's bank account is a black hole. Therefore black holes are inside banks. Therefore the universe is inside a bank.

[–] peregrin5@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago

cosmic horror

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tax breaks for the rich is the only solution

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

Wouldn't it even be more helpful to just relieve the ultrarich from taxes? So they could better pay their rent too. I'd throw in one or two moneyz to help.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I suddenly feel something trickling down from above. Is this what they were talking about all these years? Is this a good thing? It smells bad, like really bad. Like somebody is cooking meth while they have a near fatal case of diarrhea. What am I supposed to do?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean, I think it's fair to ignore it 99% of the time. Frankly, as much as I love space science and science in general, we all should have a responsibility to solve real problems here and now. That's been my issue with a lot of science, currently - we need problem solvers rather than idle explorers.

[–] Septian@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

That's not what science is, though. Science is about pushing the boundaries of human knowledge. Science isn't about having a problem and trying to find a solution -- that's engineering, which is informed by science.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The problem is that most of our problems aren't really science problems. Or at least the thing holding them up isn't the lack of practical applied scientists. They're political ones. We've known what we needed to do about climate change for decades but their are capitalists who stand to lose from doing anything about it, so we don't. We have plenty of housing, it's just being hoarded by people who do nothing with it but extract free money from people who are desperate to have a place to live. We have amazing medicine, but corporations are able to abuse IP laws to price gouge people who need it to live.

A scientist or engineer could come up with some amazing sci-fi tech that has the potential to save us and capitalists would find some way to make it bleed us dry.

[–] ik5pvx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whenever you get this kind of thoughts, take a moment to also think about the maths behind your CT and MRI scans, which originated from early radio astronomy. Alas, I don't have a source for this other than it was said by an astronomy professor during a lesson for an exam I never even attempted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Don't get me wrong, understanding the nature of the universe is valuable and noteworthy. But how would that information meaningfully impact anyone's life or change their behavior or worldview beyond a general awe at the unfathomable mysteries we already have towards space as we've understood it for centuries? Am I meant to stare up at the sky from 8:15 to 8:30 every other night with my mouth agap while I try to wrap my mind around the spacetime bubble we all exist on the surface of? Or can I just eat dinner?

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

Am I meant to stare up at the sky from 8:15 to 8:30 every other night with my mouth agap while I try to wrap my mind around the spacetime bubble we all exist on the surface of?

At scale that sounds better for society than going to church. We need a little more memento mori (memento minima?) in modern life.

[–] Blemish5236@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean on top of answering fundamental questions about the nature if reality, proving that the universe is a black hole would necessarily invalidate almost every religion. That fact alone would upend society, and probably in a bad way.

Also, if the universe is a black hole that means the universe is capable of reproduction. If the universe reproduces, there is likely no limit to the number of times it can do so. If an infinite number of universes spawn an infinite number of children, it basically establishes reincarnation as a fact of life.

And that's ignoring all the philosophical implications such a discovery would immediately raise.

Maybe it wouldn't change anything. Maybe it would change everything.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 0 points 1 month ago

Why would the universe being a black hole invalidate religion, any more than, for example, the universe being really big already does? Don't most religions focus more on some entity or entities they think made or govern the universe more than what physical processes are "used" to do that, or what the ultimate shape of the universe is? Even when a contradiction is found, it's easy enough for a religion to just say "well, that was metaphorical", or "just the limited understanding given by (insert deity here) to our ancestors" or something along those lines to make it fit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The reason research like this exists is because we don't know what we don't know. Results like these are meant to stoke curiousity so that more research can be done.

So on and so forth until one day you have horseshoe crabs saving millions of lives. But they didn't know that would be the case when they started researching them crabs, function comes after exploration.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Ok I've been meaning to ask this in the Space community or the NoStupidQuestions community. I've seen this news circling around the past 2 weeks and have been watching videos of people talking about it.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think the gist is that astronomers discovered with the JWST that some galaxies at the end of the observable universe appear to be younger than they are supposed to be. So it kinda blows a hole in the big bang expansion where objects farther away should be older. And that somehow ties in with the theory that our universe is inside a blackhole.

It's fascinating but I don't know what to do with that information other than just be fascinated. I think it was Neil deGrasse Tyson who said "what does it matter to us? nothing", because us being in a blackhole doesn't change anything in the scale of our universe.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Another big part of it is that if the big bang happened evenly then galaxies and other objects should be spinning in random directions. So far that's not what's been observed. There seems to be a preferred direction everything spins in.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jared@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've always liked this theory, imagining the cosmos is just a series/web/tree of black holes draining into the next. Everything gets recycled eventually.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It meshes well with my occasional feeling that reality is just circling the drain.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Maybe the far away galaxies are just the close galaxies seen from the other side?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago

You better start believing in compression systems you're in one

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I took a physics course at a community college over 20 years ago and one of the things that stood out to me was the professor telling us not to overthink or assign too much romanticism to the idea of black holes.

His message was basically “it just means the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light… if you plug the size and mass of the universe into the escape velocity formula, the result you get back is greater than the speed of light, so our entire universe is a black hole.”

If this was being discussed at a community college decades ago then I think the new discoveries aren’t as revelatory as they would at first appear to the general public.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nah really it was probably some small thing the media got a hold of and just ran with. I think you're spot on

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your SMBC link doesn't work for me, it just opens the index.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] xorollo@leminal.space 0 points 1 month ago

Works now! Thanks, and very relevant.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the contrary; while I have heard the explanation that the commenter you replied to has said I have also heard a slightly different theory:

Our universe is the 3 dimensional event horizon of a 4th dimensional black hole. By extension we may find that black holes in our universe have similar funky 2 dimensional areas at their even horizons.

I am sure clickbait articles are part of it but there also seems to be several actual theories surrounding the idea of the nature of our universe relating to black holes.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (29 children)

Our universe is 4 d not 3 d

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Theory is one thing.
Observation is the next step.

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Absolutely. I don’t want to minimize the importance of the new discoveries in any way; I’m just saying this isn’t the great surprise the original post seems to think it is.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interestingly, galaxies at the edge of our ability to perceive are in fact receding away from us at velocities greater than the speed of light.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Maybe it’s because they are outside the black hole and aren’t time dilated.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

another thing I learned at some point: Just because a physics formula returns a result, doesn't mean that it's reality

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 0 points 1 month ago

we could acknowledge it as a possibility AND work to better our um.. local frame of reference.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 1 month ago

Considering NASA could be canceled by an ass hole, I think we have other problems.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

hasn't this been a theory for a while now? The event horizon of a black hole keeps information minus one dimension. and the theory goes that our entire universe is just at the edge or a black hole in a 4D universe

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes, we ignore it. Given the size of the universe, if being inside a black implies any conseqences that will ever hurt us, it will be a process that takes billions of years to develop, giving the human race billions of years to either become extinct or solve the problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›