this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16700 readers
218 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the contrary; while I have heard the explanation that the commenter you replied to has said I have also heard a slightly different theory:

Our universe is the 3 dimensional event horizon of a 4th dimensional black hole. By extension we may find that black holes in our universe have similar funky 2 dimensional areas at their even horizons.

I am sure clickbait articles are part of it but there also seems to be several actual theories surrounding the idea of the nature of our universe relating to black holes.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

Do you have any idea how little that narrows things down?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Three spacial dimensions, which is normally what people mean when they say that, unless they specify otherwise. For example, we call them 3D game engines, not 4D. Yes, there's also a time dimension that is special. It cannot be moved through freely.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

How not? Do you not save your progress? Do you not old up old files? Really think bud

[–] vala@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, this universe is 3d.

I'm assuming you are thinking that time is the 4th dimension and we have time here so we are 4d?

Time may be the 4th dimension, but in our universe, time doesn't actually behave like a proper dimension. For one thing, dimensions should be spatially perpendicular to each other and time is not. We also seem to only be able to move one way through time whereas we can move back and forth through the other 3 dimensions.

Dimensions get weird and complicated. For the intents and purposes of this conversation it's correct to say that the universe were experiencing now is 3 dimensional.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's actually a crazy take that time isn't a dimension. We'll if someone say the sky is purple who am I to argue?

[–] vala@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like I said, time is likely a dimension. It just doesn't behave like a proper dimension in our universe / reality.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Neither does light...

[–] PleaseLetMeOut@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, but if you're beyond the event horizon of a black hole time becomes basically* irrelevant. You could literally turn around, look back out towards the rest of he universe, and watch all of time play out in the blink of an eye.

You know that scene in Interstellar where they land on the planet for 5 minutes, but 20 years passes for everyone else due to the planet's mass? It's the same thing, but a billion-billion-billion times more severe.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No, time does not become irrelevant. It's perfectly normal for things inside the black hole. Here's the space time diagram for our universe on the right, and a black hole at the top-left. Time is the vertical axis, space is the horizontal. The speed of light is a 45° angle, and the solid lines are event horizons. The hourglass shapes are the cones of all your possible futures and pasts (aka, anywhere that isn't faster than the speed of light from a position). Notice the space-time diagram looks exactly the same on the other side of the horizon. To get back through though you'd have to travel faster than that 45° angle, which is impossible.

collapsed inline media

Edit: I remembered there's a PBS Space Time video that will help you understand this if you don't. It goes a lot further than just this version of the diagram.

[–] PleaseLetMeOut@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm aware of the Penrose diagram and also watch PBS SpaceTime :)

But I was referring more to the frame of reference of our universe vs that of being inside a blackhole (assuming you could magically avoid being ripped apart by gravity). To an observer inside a blackhole, "time" on the outside would blink by almost instantly. I wasn't talking about moving through an infinite universe or near/into a black hole. Just stationary, floating just beyond the event horizon, looking out. Hence the asterisk on basically*.

I was leading them to what MotoAsh posted. But they beat me to it while I was typing.

Edit: He even references what I'm talking about at 0:44 in the SpaceTime video. But from the frame of reference of an outside observer.