this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33259 readers
1531 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 69 points 11 hours ago (23 children)

The Last Jedi.

I left the theatre angry that they spent enough money to take mankind back to the moon on something that stupid.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 53 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (4 children)

I can't leave it at that. I have to add some details.

Both the empire and the rebels repeatedly made tactical decisions so stupid a five-year old would know better. The opening battle involved sending unprotected bombers against a ship with anti-bomber defences and keeping the enemy commander talking on the phone to delay his response. That works in a Mel Brooks movie, not in Star Wars.

They killed a fan-favourite character off-screen. What, was the puppet too old to reprise its role?

The empire's main guy decided to chase the rebels down instead of destroying them immediately. For fun, I guess.

Phasma's a badass. Except that she capitulates at the first sign of personal danger.

All Holdo had to say was "yes, there's a plan. Not telling you what because of operational secrecy". Instead she expected Poe to blindly follow orders when he'd already shown he couldn't do that.

"Oh no, the sacred texts!" ...that you attempted to burn a moment ago.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 38 points 10 hours ago

My favorite bit:

Leia gives Rey a pendant and tells her that she can use that to track them wherever they go.

In the SAME SCENE, with NO CUTS, they are tracked by the first order and shout "THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE!"

You just described, IN THE SAME SCENE, how it is, in fact, possible.

Bonus: Putting a tracker in the Falcon was how the Death Star found Yavin IV in the very first movie.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

All Holdo had to say was “yes, there’s a plan. Not telling you what because of operational secrecy”. Instead she expected Poe to blindly follow orders when he’d already shown he couldn’t do that.

Well, he did fine following orders in the first movie, and then they changed the entire character in the second movie but kept the same name. I have no idea why they did that.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 11 points 6 hours ago

I highly highly recommend this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuuDTnMPMgc

I think you'll like it a lot. I realized that bathos is what I hated about the Last Jedi. They killed so many truly deep moments to have stupid jokes. They couldn't let anything just be serious. It ruined the tone of the movie, couldn't decide if they wanted to be a comedy or a drama, and so they did neither.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

You expect a movie director only interested in pretty scenes to write a good plot!?

... your name must be Kathleen Kennedy...

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 45 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The Hobbit trilogy. It's hard to understand how Peter Jackson could mess up movie after movie after movie like that.

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 33 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Simple:

He and his crew had 2 years of prep for Lotr, storyboards, finding locations, making props and sets, etc.

New Line Cinemas forced him to do that same prep in 6 months for the Hobbit. Allegedly they didn't even fully finish the script and had to cut in Del Toro scenes.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 38 points 10 hours ago

The forced trilogy structure also really hurt it. When the Hobbit film adaptation was initially announced (at the time just two movies, even), I thought that it didn't make any sense to adapt a book shorter than any of the individual LotR installments into multiple movies. When they revealed it would be a trilogy, I knew it was some studio decision to milk it for money and didn't have high hopes.

There is actually a fan edit floating around online somewhere called "The Hobbit: Extended Edition" which, contrary to what the name might imply, cuts down the trilogy into a single movie of comparable length to the LotR Extended films. Still not perfect, but a huge improvement in quality just from cutting out all of the extra garbage that didn't need to be there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 44 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

Borderlands. How did they spend that much money and none of the decision makers stop and think "nope this is crap"

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 34 points 12 hours ago (8 children)
[–] Cascio@lemmy.world 28 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You mean, "Dances with Smurfs"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Avatar at least had the excuse of existing to push 3D and mo-cap technology.

Not sure about Avatars 2-5...

[–] Balaquina@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 hours ago

i love that the answer to "which one?" is "doesn't matter, they suuuuuuck"

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] radix@lemmy.world 28 points 11 hours ago (4 children)
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

What, you didn't like the butthole cut?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (14 children)

It _could _ have been great. But it ended up - like the Mario movie - being a formulaic piece of drek.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Both movies were loved by their target demographic: children

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 26 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

'Live action' remakes of animated classics, or any remake of an already good film.

Remake the ones that had potential. but failed in the execution.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

All those Disney live action remakes are sooo bad. People just don't have the expressiveness of cartoon characters. The Lion King was the worst. The characters were animated and still wooden

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

All of the Jurassic Parks sequels.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

Even the Spielberg's sequel?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Especially the Spielberg sequel... After the success of the first movie, Crighton wrote a Lost World novel as a sequel to the FILM, not the first book.

Spielberg jettisoned the book and did his own sequel instead. :(

I really wanted to see the chameleon dinosaurs on film.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny

[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 18 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

At least it was better than Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 9 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Did we watch the same movie? I marathoned all the films and Dial of Destiny is dire. To be honest, only the first film is truly great. I'd probably rank them 1, 3, 4, 2, 5.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No way temple of doom is worse than crystal skull right? I guess if you ignore the racism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago

Crusade > Raiders.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 18 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

Pearl Harbor. 5 minutes of cool CGI, rest of it being absolutely forgettable.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Id rather watch earl arbor. Its about a guy named earl who is also a tree.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There's a distinction to point out between "absolutely no business getting made" vs "the final product turned out to be shit". I can't really think of anything that belongs to the former... I haven't actually seen most of the films mentioned here so far, except the SW sequels... which turned out to be shit, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't have made SW sequels at all: they just shouldn't have made them shit.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I was more curious about the former but got a lot more of the latter. Unfortunately, it would be difficult to phrase the question to get the desired result. Oh well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Odo@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Battleship. It's just such a bizarre license for a movie, and certainly one nobody ever asked for. (Well, outside Hasbro execs clearly desperate for another Transformers-level hit.)

Oddly watchable in a big dumb fun kind of way, at least. And hey, it has Jesse Plemons not playing a total sociopath, so that's neat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 hours ago

Ohh i forgot another one of my favorite. Ghost in the Shell live action. I love that movie because of Scarlett Johansson, but if you watch the original anime, everything just feels better, and the live action is simply unnecessary.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny

load more comments
view more: next ›