this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
-75 points (25.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33022 readers
4483 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not about how much weight the plane carries so much as flight attendants doing overhead lifting and the risk of one falling out of the overhead locker. Source, I'm on the internet and you read it

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 30 points 1 day ago

Actually it's about charging people extra as often as you can.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It’s both, weight starts to become a bigger deal when you factor in that you have to keep it in the air for thousands of km. If airlines could charge people by weight they would in a heartbeat

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 35 points 1 day ago (16 children)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Jozav@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Judging by the comments, this is the perfect shitpost. Thank you for the smiles.

[–] DuskyRo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Downvoted not because of AI but because you didn't even bother to remove the piss filter.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's for the safety of the people handling the luggage, not for the weight of the plane

[–] remon@ani.social 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Then how do you explain the 8kg weight limit for carry on? Who is endagered by 9kg luggage? And it's not even handled by the staff.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The overhead compartments have a weight limit because they must be designed to keep the stuff in there during an emergency.

[–] remon@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No weight limit under the seat, though.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

There is a bar or some device that is there to prevent your stuff from sliding forwards. I've not been crawling on the airplane floors enough to see any weight rating on it but I would bet money on it being crash tested and rated according to whatever the overhead compartments are.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 13 hours ago

honestly I think they also just want an excuse to charge you extra, but the official reason is also safety, to prevent injury if a bag falls out of the overhead compartment during turbulence.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

or just drive instead, and bring as much luggage as you want. without paying extra. on your own schedule. and not inhaling 50-100 people and their kids' disgusting plague germs.

god, fuck literally everything about flying

every long journey should be available with trains (if on land).

[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Instructions unclear, my car sank off tge coast of bordeaux

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 4 points 1 day ago (10 children)

not only ai slop, also body shaming

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] remon@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I got very lucky flying this year, always ended up next to an empty seat or even an entire empty row. Until the last flight. Middle seat between two very American sized women who were partially spilling over into my seat.

Thank god it was just a 30 mins flight.

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 1 points 20 hours ago

eat your luggage

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So should skinny people pay less for clothes?

[–] remon@ani.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't see the problem with pricing clothes depending on how much material was used.

[–] mEEGal@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the difference in price would be so small you wouldn't even care

the price of your clothing is mostly supply chain "middle-men" taking their share, not the source material nor the people actuality bringing it to shape. especially with synthetic materials

if it weren't true (i.e. if the material actually cost that much), stores wouldn't literally destroy / throw away brand new clothes just to "refresh" every couple of weeks

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I already pay more for my clothes, namely because only specific brands have my sizes. So yeah, my partner pays way less for clothing. Same with shoes, I have a 48eu and I'm forced to buy expensive brands just because, while my partner can buy cheaper shoes with waaay more choices.

What's your point?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nebulaone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This actually makes a lot of sense. It shouldn't be about fat shaming, but you cant ignore reality and you should make rules based on it. People with normal weight shouldn't be punished.

[–] PussButton@lemmy.org 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›