"I know for a fact there is a client list, because we both are on it"
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
393 points (99.0% liked)
politics
24617 readers
2343 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I wonder where they're all flying these days. Who's keeping the current list? How many years from now does someone come forward to tell the same story
It's a ridiculous thing to imagine that only the US possesses intel about Epstein. I'm sure a foreign government will leak more about Trump's involvement with Epstein. Virginia Giuffre named Trump in addition to others and she recently "committed suicide."
I’m sure a foreign government will leak more about Trump’s involvement with Epstein.
So?
Imagine the entire UN (bar the US) put their stamp of approval on video evidence. What difference would it make?
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
As a Republican this Leaves me ANGRY because I THOUGHT the CLINTONS were on that List but if Trump, who was Epstein's Best Friend, says there is No List then that means the CLINTONS never Raped kids either!
Honestly I think it's kind of funny the administration is trying to bury this, because there is already very public information on Trump being a rapist and making creepy remarks towards young girls.
If it releases with him on it his supporters would absolutely do the mental gymnastics required to use it as proof the liberal elite are an evil cabal, while also insisting that dear leader is blameless.
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/trump-epstein-2016-complaint.pdf
This court filing is horrific and names both trump and Epstein as defendants. The victim withdrew after the deposition, if I’m remembering correctly.
an evil cabal
There’s that word, which Marjorie TG mispronounced as cable in a Qanon promotional video years ago. Fucking dumbass.
They would do mental gymnastics to wave off dear leader fucking little girls, yes.
Would they forgive him for fucking little boys though?
Is he a Catholic priest? Survey sayyys...
Trump infiltrated the pedo ring to bring it down, naturally.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I know the /s is there (mentally) but the idea that someone is mad that kids weren't raped is abhorrent.
Only a republican could be upset that kids weren't raped.
load more comments
(5 replies)
No one ever asks why Epstein was allowed to kill himself. Who gave the order to take him off suicide watch? I remember people at the time screaming that it was a bad idea.
Why didn't he suicide himself the first time he was in jail?
I didn't hear too much about the first time. I don't remember it. I know he was on suicide watch. Then he suddenly wasn't with every medical professional saying he needed to stay on suicide watch. Was he on suicide watch the first time?
Because he knew he could continue his lifestyle afterwards.
He continued his lifestyle while he was still in jail.
He only had to spend nights at the jail and he still had women visit him constantly. No one knew what they were doing because the guards were not allowed to guard him.
Epstein was also allowed out of the stockade for up to 12 hours a day, six days a week on work-release after agreeing to pay off-duty deputies to guard him at his office at 250 Australian Ave. On workdays, Epstein’s driver picked him up at the stockade and drove him several miles to his office — just steps away from Goldberger’s office — at a nonprofit he founded seven months before he pleaded guilty.
To be clear, that was in 2008 when he was serving time in Florida. The situation in 2019 in NYC was very different.
Yes. He has been in jail more than once.
To be clear, again, why didn't he suicide himself the first time he was in jail?
I suspect because they didn't have all his video files. Couldn't kill him if those files could get leaked after his death.
I think the onus ultimately falls upon the head of the DOJ at the time (Barr, if I recall correctly), who was appointed by trump, and at the time loyal to him.
And whose father had previously employed Epstein as a teacher.
That would be Bill Barr. Look into it yourself but Bill probably had Epstein killed, he's the guy who knows what happened.
load more comments
(1 replies)
There is no evidence... anymore.
c'mon do it, you jilted sycophantic cuck. you were born to engage in political corruption, get burned by people better at it than you, than lash out at them in a tantrum fueled by your delusions of having conflicted morals. just do it
#DO THE MANCHILD HUSK
there is zero reason for anyone to believe Epstein killed himself even if we are given direct evidence from the state itself. everything from them is suspect and should not be trusted regardless of the quality provided. why would anyone listen to the words of a government that inherently distrusts its citizens and wants, objectively, the worst for them? even if Epstein actually did kill himself we are never going to accept that as a society and honestly, we shouldn't, because this is absolutely something those in power would do and we should never forget that or become complacent to it.
there is zero reason for anyone to believe Epstein killed himself
Except that this would be completely normal for a prisoner.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The title of that article should be "Elon Musk Gets His Name In Print Again"
Because there's nothing there, really. I'm reading an old book ("old" meaning twenty years which is not old but- ) it has used Newsweek as a source of truth several times. Because there was a time it was considered to be so.
It is not now. Whoever owns it is playing a bad game of chicken with journalism.
You can pick one of the 70 sources from this list, then: https://ground.news/article/jeffrey-epstein-had-no-client-list
Oh the list exists, of course. I'm not saying they're making up things necessarily - just that they're making "news articles" out of tweets and other low-effort so-called-journalism which wasn't really the case a long time ago.
No need to single out Newsweek, then, as basically all publications opted for this sort of cheap content to inflate their pages...
Newsweek, given it's history and the crass purchasing of the branding is especially egregious.
business insider, for example, can do what it wants and yeah it's just regular terrible.
If they report on the old things: "this isn't new news! Stupid media"
If they don't, "ugh 24 hour news cycle, they report on it once then forget about it. Stupid media."
I'm giving this one a pass if it keeps the files in the limelight and/or pisses off Trump.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Bullshit.
This is all hoked-up drama to distract the masses while they push us into working poverty.
Agent Krasnov and whatever KGB names Elon and his father have been given would agree.
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
Great fight.
Basically just like these tournaments:
Might as well bring Pride Tournaments back.
Honestly occam’s razor says that there is likely no amazing smoking gun detailing all these people and all the terrible things they did like the right (and beyond but hear me out) has been claiming without evidence for years, but rather there are probably just some travel logs that hint or imply if you squint hard enough and aren’t really that interesting or damning on their own. So now the conspiracy theorists control the White House and with it the flow of information, they have the opportunity to release the information they swear exists, and yet the conspiracy doesn’t work anymore because they can’t claim “the powers that be” are protecting anyone without attacking Trump now.
The beflief is that Epstein collected and kept evidence that he could use to blackmail his wealthy and powerful clients, either on behalf of an intelligence agency which he had claimed to have ties to, or just to protect himself and gain personal influence and power.
This isn't a right wing conspiracy, it cuts across the US political spectrum
I know what the conspiracy is, and I’m bringing up the right specifically (and I made sure to preface that I was doing that and that this conspiracy extends beyond them but I guess you missed it) because the far right currently controls the government and a lot of the right wing political grift hinges on things like “Trump is going to release the truth about Epstein and all the people who were part of his network.”
When Biden was president and the democrats controlled the senate, the right screeched for years that Biden and his administration were protecting the pedophiles. Now they have control, and nothing has changed. They can’t explain it without attacking Trump. Which they’ll never do directly because 1) he’s critical to their income and 2) look how well that’s gone for Musk
but rather there are probably just some travel logs that hint or imply if you squint hard enough and aren’t really that interesting or damning on their own
Right. They had videos from Diddy and couldn't take him down beyond the smaller charges. People seem to forget you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt for a criminal conviction.
Epstein's client list was for blackmail - not prosecution by due process of law. All he had to do was threaten Mr Moneybags about that time he went to town with a girl and now Epstein suddenly has tens more millions of dollars.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›