this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
570 points (92.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32949 readers
4102 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 77 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
  1. Escalates the angry driver situation.
  2. Takes photos while driving.

Neither driver here is in the right.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 48 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't need to be right.

Fuck you Kevin you piece of shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] groet@feddit.org 15 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

going 70 in a 50

Both drivers deserve to lose their license

[–] Stez827@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Probably not. It could be in the middle of nowhere or on a road where the speed limit hasn't been evaluated and the state default is 50. There are tons of roads like that in California or even some where the limit is in the 30s but it really shouldn't be and locals are in the 60s usually.

[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 hours ago

You, The Master Driver, are amply equipped to decide what the true speed limit should be.

[–] groet@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Well if you operate a death machine it would be realy nice if you could follow the rules and not kill somebody. Of course the rules should be reasonable but being unable to follow them means you should not be operating a death machine

[–] Stez827@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

There's no reason to follow unreasonable rules even when you're driving a death machine. Especially when not following the rules has an essentially near 0 difference in hurting someone with your cage of death(not trying to be sarcastic with cage of death). Many of these roads are designed for much higher speed limits but just have not been evaluated by the government for their speed limit and possibly never will be or they will be evaluated at a much lower than reasonable speed. For example the speed limit of most California freeways is 65 traffic moves at 80 regularly and sometimes when people are feeling frisky up to 90. Neither of those speeds are unreasonable when everyone around you is also doing them and people are used to those situations or understand they will be in those situations. A great example is Germany where parts of their freeways have no speed limit where people are doing in excess of 120 mph and semis are also using it at under 60.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 68 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, honking at me. And those flashing lights on the roof of their car are really annoying.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.zip 59 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 30 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 5 hours ago

This one made me bust out laughing. Such a perfect combination.

The previous one is great too. Both new to me, at least.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 43 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The only reason I accept to not let these people pass is if it forces you do something unsafe, like throwing yourself over to the next lane and slamming on the brakes to match speed with the other cars. Otherwise just give them the lane and let them be a reckless ass somewhere else away from you. Safer that way. It's not your job to enforce traffic rules.

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. You have no clue why they're speeding either. Sure it could be some a-hole, but it could also be someone with a medical situation, or someone that's about to poop their pants.

When I was younger I used to stay in the lane. Now I move over if it's safe, and let them pass. Not worth the chance of accidentally upsetting a psycho.

[–] Lemzlez@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I agree it’s safer to let them pass, but a medical (or personal) emergency does not give you the right to endanger other people on the road by driving fast and/or recklessly. That’s why they paint priority vehicles in bright colours and put flashing lights on them - to make it safer for everyone.

If you have a medical emergency, you call an ambulance. Yes, they will have to drive to you first, but care starts when they arrive. If the emergency isn’t big enough to get an ambulance, there’s no reason to drive fast either.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago

Have you seen how expensive an ambulance ride is?

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 hours ago

Being in the US, I’d order an uber before I call for an ambulance. Even with insurance I’m afraid to test that debt machine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 30 points 4 hours ago

This comment section is a very good case study in why better public transportation is absolutely necessary: a lot of you should not ever drive.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 29 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

You know, I get it, they're probably just an asshole. Maybe they're having an emergency, though. How about just letting them get around in case there is a good reason for driving recklessly? Or maybe just in case they're nuts enough to make things violent?

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 54 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I mean, the text say the guy honked for going "70 in a 50".

If you take it at face value, the person posting is the asshole and a terrible driver endangering everybody on the road.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 37 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

She's taking selfies while driving, clearly she's the better person

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 points 15 hours ago

I could be wrong but it looks like a dual direction dash cam. Since it’s the internet, the text and pic might have never been related. Also, the person doing over 70 in a 50 couldn’t overtake at 20? The whole thing seems like rage bait.

[–] MrScruff@lemmy.zip 22 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The other person would have to be doing 70 as well, in order to honk at them.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Sure. There can be more than one terrible driver endangering everybody on the road at the same time.

I'm constantly, endlessly disappointed at how hard it is for human brains to accept that two people disagreeing with each other can both be wrong.

[–] MrScruff@lemmy.zip 8 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

The only thing I was in disagreement over was that you said "was the asshole".

When they were both assholes all along.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] youngalfred@lemmy.zip 6 points 18 hours ago

Could've honked while being overtaken

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 13 hours ago

And the other guy is the bigger asshole for honking at the poster for going too slowly when she's doing 20 over.

If you take it all at face value, that is.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

No one is in danger strictly because of 20 over. Please. Our speed limits are insane and not grounded in safety.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I never really looked into this (relation between speed limits and accidents/safety), so I figured I'd verify your statement with a quick google search and it turns out you've got it all wrong. There is a deep well established link between speed limits and accident risk, see for example here:

https://road-safety.transport.ec.europa.eu/eu-road-safety-policy/priorities/safe-road-use/safe-speed/archive/speeding/speed-central-issue-road-safety/speed-and-accident-risk_en

Now you know! :)

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

We're talking about speeding and you post some study about absolute speed? GTFO🤣.

You want to talk about absolute risk? What's the increase in risk when you set an arbitrarily low speed limit on a highway clearly able to handle high speeds? When you look at the reality of induced road rage and creating large deltas in speed?

You'd be that politician giving yourself a pat on the back while ignoring the actual effects of your policy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Going 20 is the definition of "letting them pass". Or should she have ran off the road so the tailgating ahole could continue on going 90 in a 50 zone?

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Move out of the passing lane generally is the simple and legal thing to do.

[–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

This.

Lived in Korea for awhile, and they generally seem to not have this kind of vindictiveness or self-righteousness. They're usually like, "I dunno. Either they got a reason, or it's not worth the effort for me to do something about it."

That said, social pressure is much more effective here, so the vast majority of people fall in line. See COVID

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Using phone while driving... Great.

Fuck everyone who ever touches their phone while the hevicle is on. This shit is not okay, ever.

[–] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
  1. The phone is clearly mounted on the dashboard.

  2. It's not uncommon for people to record their whole trip for social media, not just take to a picture.

  3. This caption could have been pasted over a completely unrelated screenshot of someone else's video for all we know.

Don't touch your phone while driving, but also, don't believe everything you see on social media.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

On your last point... It's still damaging because it normalises it. UK has very harsh stance on this and you'd get in shit even for point 1. There should be zero tolerance on this. They're a dickhead driver regardless. Two dickheads don't make it right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I have some great news for you. Look at what took effect yesterday in my state! Using a mobile device, including at a red light, is now a primary offense (you'll get pulled over for just that).

This just applies to PA, but it's a pretty big state with a population between Sweden and the Netherlands, so it's not nothing!

https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/penndot/documents/travelinpa/safety/trafficsafetyanddrivertopics/documents/distracted-driving-laws-fact-sheet.pdf

[–] coolfission@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Doesn’t matter if it's not enforced. We have no holding phone rules in GA and I routinely see people using their phones while driving.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 hour ago

Worse, too often these laws are selectively enforced only when cops are looking for an excuse to profile minorities and poorer drivers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 hours ago

tbf, going 20 in a 50 zone is probably not a terrible situation to be multitasking in. not at all like multitasking at 50 in a 50 zone

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 5 points 3 hours ago

hevicle

Given the size bloat, I think heavy vehicle => hevicle is appropriate.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I do this and then wonder why the fuck the asshole honking won't just pass.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I turn it into a game to see how slow I have to go before they leave.

I have come to a full stop before, and they just kept honking. they did drive off once I got out and grabbed a crow bar from the bed of my truck and walked towards them with a smile.

I had no intention of hurting them and it was more for my own protection than anything. They clearly wanted an altercation and fled once they realized how utterly stupid they were being.

some folks just want to feel some kind of power because they feel powerless and they just need a wake-up call.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Only time I've been close to road rage was when a Mercedes CL had a really bright LED strobe light installed inside it's front grill and he activating it, if somebody was in his way.

It wasn't a cop or other emergency vehicle. Just an asshole.

I was lucky to be in front of him for 15 minutes when traffic got compacted enough to prevent lane change.

For a moment I considered hitting the brakes on that particular tailgater.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

All fun and games until you get someone willing to escalate 😁

A pit maneuver is easily defendable as an accident if nobody is looking.

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

I just let them pass you. Not worth some lunatic you piss off even more and end up shooting you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I take my foot off of the gas pedal, if they don't pass me by the time I've coasted to as slow as idle will take me I assume they aren't going to and return to the speed I was going previously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Have you ever slipped and accidentally honked at someone?

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 10 points 14 hours ago

Oh yeah. At a stop sign or traffic light, slow traffic, kinda rested my arms on the wheel and hit the horn on accident. Felt like an ass.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›