this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
622 points (90.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32972 readers
4307 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You know, I get it, they're probably just an asshole. Maybe they're having an emergency, though. How about just letting them get around in case there is a good reason for driving recklessly? Or maybe just in case they're nuts enough to make things violent?

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 53 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean, the text say the guy honked for going "70 in a 50".

If you take it at face value, the person posting is the asshole and a terrible driver endangering everybody on the road.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She's taking selfies while driving, clearly she's the better person

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 points 22 hours ago

I could be wrong but it looks like a dual direction dash cam. Since it’s the internet, the text and pic might have never been related. Also, the person doing over 70 in a 50 couldn’t overtake at 20? The whole thing seems like rage bait.

[–] MrScruff@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The other person would have to be doing 70 as well, in order to honk at them.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure. There can be more than one terrible driver endangering everybody on the road at the same time.

I'm constantly, endlessly disappointed at how hard it is for human brains to accept that two people disagreeing with each other can both be wrong.

[–] MrScruff@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The only thing I was in disagreement over was that you said "was the asshole".

When they were both assholes all along.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

The destination was the assholes we met all along.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago

The alternative interpretation is that the second driver was doing 50, and honked at the first driver when they passed doing 70.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io -1 points 1 day ago

I mean, fair enough, on a technicality at least.

[–] youngalfred@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Could've honked while being overtaken

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 19 hours ago

And the other guy is the bigger asshole for honking at the poster for going too slowly when she's doing 20 over.

If you take it all at face value, that is.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

No one is in danger strictly because of 20 over. Please. Our speed limits are insane and not grounded in safety.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I never really looked into this (relation between speed limits and accidents/safety), so I figured I'd verify your statement with a quick google search and it turns out you've got it all wrong. There is a deep well established link between speed limits and accident risk, see for example here:

https://road-safety.transport.ec.europa.eu/eu-road-safety-policy/priorities/safe-road-use/safe-speed/archive/speeding/speed-central-issue-road-safety/speed-and-accident-risk_en

Now you know! :)

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

We're talking about speeding and you post some study about absolute speed? GTFO🤣.

You want to talk about absolute risk? What's the increase in risk when you set an arbitrarily low speed limit on a highway clearly able to handle high speeds? When you look at the reality of induced road rage and creating large deltas in speed?

You'd be that politician giving yourself a pat on the back while ignoring the actual effects of your policy.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world -3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Oh hey look a guy on the internet who doesn't when someone contradicts his baseless claims with evidence. There's something you don't see every day.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh hey, some guy mouthing off who doesn't understand how relative and absolute risk work who just went off to have Google to search for the phrase that validates their assumptions. Rare sighting indeed.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world -4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Facts don't care about your feelings. You've presented zero evidence to the contrary, how are you this confident about your assertion? This is such a joke

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Get ratioed and take a stats class.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The forces involved in a collision grow exponentially with speed. It's basic physics

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 bravo. Further showing the lack of understanding. Just fantastic.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Going 20 is the definition of "letting them pass". Or should she have ran off the road so the tailgating ahole could continue on going 90 in a 50 zone?

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Move out of the passing lane generally is the simple and legal thing to do.

[–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

This.

Lived in Korea for awhile, and they generally seem to not have this kind of vindictiveness or self-righteousness. They're usually like, "I dunno. Either they got a reason, or it's not worth the effort for me to do something about it."

That said, social pressure is much more effective here, so the vast majority of people fall in line. See COVID