this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
357 points (96.1% liked)

News

30453 readers
3492 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31683994

Fox News reports that Donald Trump may consider using nuclear weapons to eliminate Iran’s Fordo nuclear facility

The U.S. military has reservations regarding the success of using a bunker-buster bomb, a non nuclear weapon, to eliminate Iran’s Fordo nuclear facility, buried deep in a mountain. Two defense officials were reportedly briefed that only a tactical nuclear weapon could reach the facility.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 150 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Trump will drop a nuke before leaving office. He been begging to use one since his first term. They literally had to stop him from nucking a hurricane. He wants to do it. My worry is he will drop one on an American state.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 93 points 5 days ago

I agree with you completely. He's fascinated with nukes, and believes naked demonstrations of power show that he's strong. If he does drop a nuke in Iran, you can guarantee that Russia will use them in Ukraine, and that quickly opens the door to a much wider war in Europe. Strategic thinking is not Trump's strong suit, and he's likely to bumble us into a nuclear WWIII.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I fully expect him to nuke a blue state in a false flag attack. I can't prove it, but I won't be surprised if he does

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You might enjoy the short run of the TV show Jericho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

If you can’t prove it, then they are doing the false flag operation right. Well; correctly, anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MumboJumbo@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

My worry is he will drop one on an American state.

Wouldn't be the first time, but those were on accident and thankfully didn't detonate.

Edit to add reference: 1961 Goldsboro B-52 Crash

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I mean we also blew up a lot of nukes on American soil on purpose too!

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

New Mexico had it coming tho.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

Nevada doesn't even own most of Nevada.

[–] MumboJumbo@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For science!…or something

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] earlgrey0@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago

Don’t worry, Los Angeles isn’t a state :p

[–] Buske@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (11 children)

WHO GETS THE NUKE FIRST? IRAN, GAZA OR THE FIRST HURRICANE OF THE SEASON! sadtimes.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 57 points 5 days ago

Same guy that kept ripping on Zelensky for "instigating" nuclear war

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 52 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If this were to happen, it would be a green light for Putin.

Let's hope to all fuck that our idiotic congress or who the fuck ever, prevents this abject, fucking, idiocy.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 41 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Congress isn't stopping him doing anything. I don't see them suddenly changing just to prevent global nuclear war.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 days ago

Congress’ billionaire handlers all have their doomsday prepping done, so they won’t interfere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 42 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Something tells me he has already given the order multiple times but the people around him have to carefully explain to him why that’s a very bad idea until he backs down.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Or they're just running clips of Oppenheimer for him

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"We want to stop nuclear proliferation by starting a nuclear war." - these fucking geniuses, apparently

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Then I hope the rest of the world does something about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

“Art of the Deal”. Always start “negotiations” with a threat to go nuclear, then brag and posture and bully. Deal

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You forgot the part where you Chicken out and go back on everything so you lose on both sides... No one ever sees it coming

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 days ago (9 children)

What a great precedent that would set. Seems like humans are moving towards ending all life on earth. Just another dead rock in an infinite vacuum.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm sure Jesus Christ would definitely 100% want this.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Jesus was a Palestinian Jew, if Trump met Him today he would send Him to CECOT.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

What is a country? A miserable pile of war crimes.

Turning a habitable area full of innocent people into a pile of radioactive rubble and dying people why? Because fucking the Israeli government wants to genocide palestinians without resistance? Damn we fucking suck as a country

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (5 children)

So we'll have a war of aggression with Iran for? We don't like them? Israel has committed more violations of national borders and laws. The KoSA and Egypt's citizens were involved in 9-11 and they are "allies".

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If any other country did the things Israel has done, we'd be sanctioning them at a minimum. We invaded Iraq both times for less.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hell we made up lies about Iraq

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Ah yes, very smart, let's use a nuke to blow up a nuclear facility. There couldn't possibly be a much larger explosion and spread of radiation because of that.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Explosion no. Extra fallout, maybe. But the facility we're talking about is deep underground, so even if it happens, hopefully that contains some of the fallout.

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, ground burst or partial underground bursts are significantly dirtier than air bursts. You only get partial completion of the reaction on the parts closer to the ground or underground which further irradiates the debris that is kicked up. Its all kinds of bad news.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, there actually wouldn't be a much larger explosion, that's just not how nukes work.
A nuclear explosion is an incredibly delicate process, and the material just won't go critical because there's another detonation nearby. It's not like dropping a bomb on a dynamite warehouse. There's not a great analogy for what it is like though. Expecting a satellite launch to happen because you blew up a tank of rocket fuel next to it? Not quite there.

Additional contamination from onsite material is a different matter. Most nukes detonate above their target since that maximizes damage, but it also reduces fallout. There would, however, be vaporized material that would be sucked into the air by the vacuum created by the detonation. It's not clear if the presence of radioactive material would make it significantly worse than the general "radioactive dust and molten sand" that would normally be sent into the air.

In general, if you nuke something there's going to be radioactive issues afterwards, and you shouldn't do it. Adding a nuclear facility to the mix is kinda just throwing rocks at the windows on 9/11.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 days ago

Sounds like science stuff and facts. MAGA doesn't have any time for those.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

He is going to back pedal because Iran is his boss's (Putin ) ally. He is once again talking shit he has no intention of backing up. I could see him ordering a nin-nuke strike on something that wouldn't get him in trouble with his handler though as a fake tough man move.

collapsed inline media

[–] thru_dangers_untold@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

He floats the craziest idea so that whatever happens he can say "at least I didn't do that one thing" and his base will praise him for it--even though the thing he actually did was still moronic. This is the "permanent 300% tariff", "Canada will be the 51st state", or the "Golden Trump Gaza" video. It's the only way this imbecile knows how to negotiate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 14 points 5 days ago

The headline is a reading into it a bit. They said nothing is off the table, but they are confident that a conventional strike would accomplish the goal.

Not that a strike would happen anyway, but they rarely say that any option is completely off the table. A nuclear first strike should be one of those options off the table, but it's the Trump administration we're talking about.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

At this point I’m alright with a nuclear apocalypse, we had it coming. I just hope I’m close enough to a blast sight to not have to deal with the aftermath.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Gleefully sounding the trumpet for the end of the world

Can somebody please please stop him before he kills us all?

load more comments (1 replies)

What the actual hell.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Worse president than Putin, worse people than Russians considering the power the people ~~have~~ had and the person they allow to do this.

[–] catty@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

"Considers". Fake news. They want the price of oil and gas to go up to please Putin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 474D@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Welp, time to see if aliens really are keeping us from extinction

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 9 points 5 days ago

OK, who had "The opening from Threads but in 4K" on their bingo card?

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 9 points 5 days ago

MADness.

Hopefully someone drops him beforehand.

Just please wait until after I've seen Dune Messiah a couple dozen times in theaters. Please. That's all I'm asking. I don't even need to get laid again, that ship isnt even that important and it happens to a lot of people every day. I just want to see Dune Messiah before we all die.

load more comments
view more: next ›