this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

28243 readers
4682 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yes, the old strategy of overwhelming the hospital system with mouth breathers.

Amazing strategy, Raisinhead.

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hey now, my nose is always stuffy. That has nothing to do with my great stupidity.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hospitals should be able to refuse patients who get diseases that are preventable with vaccines. Problem solved.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And what about my wife? She's allergic to the measles vaccination.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And that right there is why your argument is complete bullshit.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, exactly. You’re making it up.

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club -1 points 2 weeks ago

Then she is also allergic to measles, because all it is is weakened measles itself.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No. For multiple reasons:

  • Vaccines are not 100% effective. They reduce the likelihood of infection if you are exposed. The whole point of trying to get everyone vaccinated is to reduce the infection rate so that there's less likely to be an outbreak. With a vaccinated population, the virus can't spread fast enough to maintain a pool of infected people to keep spreading it. But that doesn't mean nobody gets sick.
  • Vaccines are not as effective on some people. There's a range of effectiveness.
  • Not everyone can get vaccinated. People with certain allergies or compromised immune systems in particular.
  • Some parts of the population have higher risk factors than others and when they get sick it can be much more serious. Usually the very old and the very young. And again, people with compromised immune systems, or other conditions that complicate the illness.
  • Kids whose parents refuse to get them vaccinated are put at elevated risk through no fault of their own.

I could probably keep going, but hopefully you get the idea why that's just not a viable approach.

[–] biscuit@lemdro.id 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Everybody who gets vaccinated is documented as having gotten vaccinated, no?

So why can't hospitals check the record and confirm that patients have been vaccinated? If they have, then everything's fine. If they couldn't get vaccinated for legitimate reasons, that'd be documented too.

The point is to ensure as many people are vaccinated as possible, not to prove a point about the efficacy of vaccines.

That said, I dislike the idea of healthcare being able to pick and choose, for any reason, not to treat someone. Then again I live in a sane country with free healthcare.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

That said, I dislike the idea of healthcare being able to pick and choose, for any reason, not to treat someone.

This is exactly the problem. Once you start talking about who does and does not deserve healthcare, you've gone to a place I refuse to follow. There is far too much nuance to start drawing lines in the sand.

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] tamman2000@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

The dems really need to appoint a shadow cabinet and hold press conferences with fact checks and useful advice about how to get vaccinated.

I'm glad that I am science literate and live close to the canadian border.

[–] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
  • Measles estimated case-fatality rate: 1.3%
  • Estimated US population: 346,715,067
  • Measles deaths if everyone in the US got measles: 4,507,295
  • Upper limit on estimated MMR vaccine caused anaphylaxis: 0.000066%
  • Anaphylaxis case-fatality rate: 0.3%
  • Estimated vaccine-caused fatality rate: 1.98 * 10^-7 %
  • Estimate vaccine-caused fatalities avoided by not vaccinating US population: 0.69
  • Net increase in fatalities from switching to measles natural immunity for everyone in the US: 4,507,294

So it would only be better if he wants an extra 4.5 million Americans to die.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Damn. If only there was a way to get protection against measles without having to get measles. Some sort of injection. That'd be useful.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe an infusion

[–] El_Azulito@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Heroin really makes you focus too, it’s great for long study sessions.

collapsed inline media

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

also convinced govt of somoa to stop MEASLES VACCINATION, resulting in 86 children deaths. also drove his former wife to suicide.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

No, in Samoa there were vaccines administered incorrectly and people died. Their hesitancy was well-founded.

[–] madkins@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not supporting this dude, but I watched the whole video and he never once said it would be better if everyone got measles. Maybe I missed it; if so, please correct me. He mentioned a waning effect with the vaccine vs full-blown infection, which I highly doubt is accurate (I'll research it later), but that's a massive stretch to get to the headline. He even recommended vaccines and said they will be available for free to anyone that needs them. I've gotten a little lazy in fact checking left leaning stuff because I always felt it was a little more trustworthy. I'm just starting to wonder how much I've been blindly accepting because it conforms to my biases.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks for watching it and writing this. Good to know it's not as stupid as it's made out to be.

I've actually got fed up with left-leaning outrage news because any time I check it it's twisted out of shape or plain wrong. I'm sure there's plenty the same in right-leaning-outrage-news, I just don't see it in the first place!

I wish people who want a world of truth and science wouldn't lie to get support.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The written article also doesn’t say it would be better if everyone got measles. I listened to the interview long enough to see the article is quoting him accurately and fairly. At least for that.

Then he spent probably too much time talking about vitamin A, and I didn’t listen to the rest

It’s really just a lying outrage headline - from the written article