this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
121 points (81.7% liked)

Technology

70275 readers
3562 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 81 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mass-Produced

I want to see these masses who can pay the million :)

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A million and get a pilot licence.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

I mean you can get a licence for 20-30k, the maintenance is deadly on a plane though, you could buy a very nice car each year on that money.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s not a flying car. It’s an airplane.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 14 points 1 day ago

It's by definition trying to merge two opposite specs into one vehicle using the worst aspects of the two.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Give me a intercity train or intercity tram any day.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think I've ever seen an intercity tram before. They tend to be strictly local affairs. Probably because local governments have to lay the lines, and there would be some kind of giant argument if it went across jurisdictions.

[–] wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

I've seen them in Germany, but between relatively small cities and towns.
Not Just Bikes made a video about Trams not long ago.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“The AirCar fulfills a lifelong dream to bring the freedom of flight into the hands of everyday people.”

The price? Between $800,000 and $1 million, depending on specs.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Don't forget the cost and time investment in getting your pilots licence.

Also there is no way this is going to be legal to drive on public roads in most countries - just look at the massive tail boom that sticks out. This is just a fancy aircraft for people that want an overcomplicated Cessna.

[–] CandleTiger@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The tail boom is massive compared to a sports car but I think the folded-up package looks not bigger than a giant American SUV.

Speaking as one who routinely has trouble parking a motor home and driving over curbs with it — this big awkward-looking vehicle doesn’t look like a great city-car but it does not compete with motor homes for the awkwardness prize.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's crazy is you can build a kit plane for less than what this costs, and flying a kit plane does NOT need a pilot license in the US.

[–] druidjaidan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Woah woah woah. Not even close to true. The only things you can fly without a license is a single seat ultralight, paramotor, and similar things that most people would barely think of as a plane. There are very specific and restrictive requirements, both on the aircraft and what you can do with it.

Anything bigger, homebuilt or not, will require a LSA license at least ans many (if not most) a full PPL.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I couldn’t find specs skimming through the article, but it doesn’t look like it would fit in any normal parking space. Driving around might be as unwieldy as a motorhome or box truck, without the height advantage when you inevitably drive over a curb while turning. Doing that might also make it un-airworthy.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Do you see what happens, Larry?

[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel like "mass-produced" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Also, insurance is going to be insane.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Also “car” - can my local mechanic service it and give it a flying certificate? If not, it’s not a car.

More like a barely road-worthy airplane.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't get insurance on these

[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're right; I forget insurance is for the poor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The vehicle, certified for airworthiness and flight-tested over 170 hours with more than 500 takeoffs and landings, is now headed for mass production.

Jesus fuck please tell me that's a typo and they left some zeros off. Your average commercial pilot has more than that before any airline is even willing to consider hiring them, that is absolutely not sufficient testing.

Still, early adopters may face bureaucratic turbulence. Potential buyers must be both licensed drivers and certified pilots.

No shit. And that is never going to change, becoming a certified pilot is a lot fuckin harder than getting a driver's license, and for very good reasons. If some BMW-driving cunt can't even be arsed to use his turn signal do you really want to ease the "bureaucratic turbulence" just so he can fuck up and crash into a packed airliner? These things still have to use runways, the people flying them still need to know how to behave themselves at airports, how to identify and avoid restricted airspace, how to communicate with ATC and how to behave if (let's be honest, when) they get Intercepted.

And all of this so you can have a car that's worse at being a car, and an airplane that's worse at being an airplane, but hey at least you won't have to book a rental car at your destination airport, which I remind you they still have to use.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

As long as they're only using smaller airports. Let the millionaires and billionaires have this. It's like another ocean gate scenario.

I agree with everything you're saying though haha.

[–] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I still don't get how these companies keep getting funded. There's literally no way these things will ever become a thing. It's simply ridiculous.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Investors and venture capitalists fronting money and riding the Hype-Go-Round, but when the music stops and the lights go out someone's going to be out a shitload of money.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

a plane. A flying car is called a plane.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I bet it handles like a boat on the roads though.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

A plane that looks a bit like a car.

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

It’s called a plane.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago

So it's a small plane then?

I swear I saw this on TV like 20 years ago, it's a stupid idea, if I wanted a plane I would buy a plane and then drive to the airport in my car, attempting to combine the two technologies just makes both of them worse.

Or you could buy a Skyhawk, three Toyota Camrys and fuel for a year.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't trust must drivers on roads, much less the air. No good will come of this.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am driving through a slight detour on my commute, it's still 3 lanes but with a slight bend, motherfuckers can't even keep their car in their fucking lane, almost hit 3 people this morning, fuckers can't drive

[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

A truly universal experience

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn, we really got flying cars before

  1. GTA 6
  2. Elder Scrolls 6
  3. Half Life 3 (but barely? Hopefully?)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

It's a Lamborghini with wings stuck on the sides, it's not a flying car.

[–] Glifted@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

There are street legal autogyros that are a lot cheaper and make more sense as a crossover vehicle

https://youtu.be/8VKfqzmLohM

[–] Sugar_Spark@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

Sweet. We need more ways for the 1% to kill themselves.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 9 points 19 hours ago

I hope its a popular buy among all our billionaires.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Okay I will admit it was impressive to see how they solved where to stow the wings and essentially shrink the airplane footprint to a long car footprint, but who is this for? Who out there has $1mil to blow and is like, "I have to drive directly from the tarmac to my hotel"?

This thing needs 300m of runway in its airplane form to get airborne, so forget city or even suburban takeoffs. And you're not going to just drive this thing around. At the end of the day, this is still a (very fancy) plane that drives.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Just find the tallest rooftop parking structure with a low wall sturdy enough for a ramp.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That's not very expensiv...

collapsed inline media

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Seen this like 10 years ago lol

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 15 hours ago

We have had helicoptors for all these decades

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Oh just like they did 5yrs ago every 5 years since the invention of powered flight

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

If wings don’t fold, fold your brain.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Looks a bit like in "The Man With The Golden Gun"

collapsed inline media

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What problem does this solve? And is that problem worth all the negatives this brings?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

No thank you, I'll take a drone cab over this any day.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Apart from all the discussion regarding how stupid this is, how the fuck would this even fit on a road? I doubt the wings would be durable enough if they were retractable. This shit would take up 2 lanes and fuck up any and all intersections. And as a added bonus, it would fuck with everyone elses perception who are used to the distances you keep away from regular vehicles when theyre turning in front of you. This shitheap wouldnt even make it to the airport because someone will probably misjudge the turn radius with the wings and fuck it up on the way there.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

They fold to the rear. So apparently they are - at least supposed to be - durable enough.

collapsed inline media

load more comments
view more: next ›