this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
269 points (95.9% liked)

politics

23765 readers
2302 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 150 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Matt Calkins, CEO of software company Appian… said Musk’s approach to running his tech companies didn’t translate well in Washington.

It doesn’t even work well in his tech companies.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Unrelated tangent on the Appian software: It is exactly your solution if you have a five person job, but need to employ 30

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

That's because he bought successful, well managed companies.

When he had full creative control... we got the Cybertruck.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I concur, fuck you Elon Musk.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But also fuck Scott Bessent. And pretty much everyone else within earshot of that conversation.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

Leave off on the permanent staff. They have to scrape Big Macs off the walls.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 week ago

I'd rather deny him those bodily pleasures. Hit him with a bat instead.

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I approve of this message

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago

Y'all are being way too nice on this actual Nazi

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 46 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Damn, a tongue lashing? But was he SLAMMED?

[–] sfled@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

It was a STUNNING tongue lashing.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He hurt a lot of people and the debt is higher than ever.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Mission accomplished, for them

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lmao. He's so fucking unlikeable. That is absolutely hilarious.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what his riches are all about, it's all just trying to make people like him. He's the unlikable rich kid who tries to buy friends.

But it's not gonna work, all the money in the world won't make people genuinely like you. Only humility and therapy would do that and those aren't going to happen.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

If he wanted people to like him, he would have solved global hunger. The UN told him that they needed only 6 billion dollars to do that. The idiot asked for an itemized list and when he was provided with one, he quit the conversation.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Fuck all of them, I say

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This is unrelated but why the fuck does every hat Musk wears look like it's like 2 sizes too small? Like I've got a big head and a proper hat settles like right on my brow, meanwhile with Musk it's like 2/3rds up his fucking forehead.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They must look right to him in the mirror. Gotta make sure the text is nice and square and forward.

Or maybe he has a sensory thing and this is how he deals with it though positioning.

The problem is that the hats technically sit correctly, so I think he just has a weird head. Though it could also be a sensory thing since he has had a lot of work done including hair plugs so maybe it's something to do with that?

IDK maybe I should stop over analyzing a fascist I wish to scalp.

[–] Incorgnito@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I saw it as his way of showing us that he has a big brain. And that he is very smart because of it.

This is just stupid enough to be believable, mind you I think he is less intelligent than labatomized cockroach but point still stands.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The trump hats are made specifically to be outrageous imo

Sure but it sits way too high on his head, this is something specific to this particular dipshit. Fuck even when Trump himself wears the dipshit hat it fits better.

[–] Pfeffy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Probably avoiding friction on his hair plugs.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't know that we should be advocating for violence here. If we do that, we may find our opponents responding by doing the same, resulting in a positive feedback loop of escalation. I mean it's not like they [checks notes] carefully planned and organized a rally based on an extremely inflammatory lie, riled up the attendees, told them to fight, sent them to the Capitol Building resulting in an angry mob that stormed the Capitol while actively calling for the deaths of the VP and several members of Congress, killing some people and vandalizing the offices of Congress...oh, no. Well, at least they weren't pardoned for their flagrant, violent insurrection...oh, no. You know what? Just disregard my earlier comments. Carry on.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Love it. Marios that are green should be free.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

We don't need violence to deal with Musk, I agree.

We can do far worse. We can strip him of his US government contracts, seize all of his US assets, and ban him from ever setting foot on US soil again.

He's always been rich since birth, but what he really craves is attention and adulation. He literally believes he's Homo Superior, and deserves worship.

He'll still be rich, but the blow to his fragile pubescent ego would be devastating.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh shut the fuck up. They're already committing violence.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe try reading again, a little more carefully this time. Start from the end, if it helps.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sure he'll be consoled by his billions and having a corrupted government that coddles him even further.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 1 week ago

The best part is no he won't. He desperately craves being liked and can't understand why he isn't.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

If gulf was a word to describe a type of person, he could be the gulf of America

[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 5 points 1 week ago

After the tongue lashing he had a ketamine chaser.

load more comments
view more: next ›