this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
923 points (91.5% liked)

Political Memes

7900 readers
2090 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] The2b@lemmy.vg 66 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Of course they will. Liberalism is a center-right ideology, they're closer to fascists than leftists.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's just a way to get minorities to vote for you.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Their good old performative "Fight for Equality" which very pointedly ignores Wealth Inequality and Wealth Discrimination which curiously, are not only the biggest of them all by a huge margin, but are even the mechanisms that multiply many-fold the negative consequences (and hence the hurt) from other kinds of inequality and discrimination, AND stop the descendants of the victims of past discrimination from pulling themselves out from the hole past discrimination threw their ancestors into (in simple terms: if you were thrown into poverty by discrimination, the poverty keeps the hurt going even after the discriminatory actions have stopped and will make it very likely your descendants are stuck there and keep on suffering).

They're literaly doing the very minimum (when measured by actual effects) they can for Equality whilst claiming they're "Fighting for Equality" as loud as they can, in order to claim they're "helping the disfavored" and hence are there for the many not the few.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Democrats would rather lose their power "temporarily" than lose their influence permanently with a progressive.

We need a third party like four months ago. We are running out of time to challenge the standing democrats.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We already have multiple.

inb4 Russia: liberals will say that about any new party, too

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 35 points 4 days ago (10 children)

If you don't like trump and you didn't vote, then you're to blame.

My country has compulsory voting so nobody has an excuse

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Is you didn't vote for Harris, you're to blame.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

No, it's the Republicans who are to blame. The Democratic leadership is to blame for not putting up a candidate or policies that the voters wanted.

It's always amazing to me that people will blame the people who couldn't stomach to vote for the Democrats, rather than getting mad at the Democratic leadership for being so awful that people can't stomach to vote for them.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

True! One is an ocean of random people with their own beliefs, reasons and personal choices. The other is an institution. An organization with a plan. A plan they wrote themselves. A plan they get detailed statistics and polling data on. A plan in which they saw what they needed to do to win and chose not to, effectively betting on anti trump sentiment to keep them from doing the thing parties in their position are supposed to do. Concede to the people and make concessions. Instead they said "status quo, steady as she goes" mid genocide, mid rent crisis, post covid and they lost that bet. No one is to blame other than the gamblers who played power politics and lost to fascists.

The people are not an organized voting block able to strategically maneuver their votes. That's what a party is for. That's it's whole purpose. And the Democrats failed as a party in that election due to their inability to stop committing a genocide, to stop pandering to mid right voters via radio silence on trans issues and active abandonment of immigrants via the adoption of 2016 trump immigration policy.

I mean come the fuck on, she was talking about FINISHING THE FUCKING WALL, the thing we all agreed was the dumbest thing ever. What do you want when the party runs someone like that?

I get you people who wanna blame the leftist in your life or on the Internet you saw saying they wouldn't be voting. I get that you blame them. But you should blame the party who thought they could win without conceding anything whatsoever to any of the marginalized groups who had no other choice. They learned that there in fact was a 3rd choice and now we all suffer the Democrats incompetence

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 32 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

Did you listen to the latest tiff between David Hogg and James Carville?

Carville really wants to push progressives out of the Democratic party while keeping their heads in the sand. I think his last rant was because Hogg wants to replace existing Dems (Carville says he should be replacing Republicans). However, I think Hogg wants to do this because these Dems aren't really doing anything and waiting to pick up the pieces from this Trump administration. I think agree more with Hogg that it's more important to show the people that you represent them rather than be like: "we're not the Republicans".

I'm not an entire fan of Hogg though, he seems a bit inconsistent but I agree with him here.

To be clear, people should have voted for the Democrats. We're all in the position we're in because not enough people did. Would you get what you want? No. But we still wouldn't be in the mess otherwise. I mean, assuming the election wasn't stolen.

That being said, all these older people that don't seem interested in fighting for their people need to be purged from the Democrats. I don't know if it's because they're really old or out of touch or what. There's a thirst for people to want representation for them to fight (as seen by the AOC and Bernie rallies). I think their inactivity isn't helping for the most part. Also, they need to get some more names out there.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 16 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I've been low-key following this drama and Hogg is out there spearheading the "tea party style takeover" that people have been saying the DNC needs. Carville, Schumer, and Co. seem to think that letting the republicans off the leash to blow up everything and hurt everyone is the best path forward. Put another way, the plan is to continue offering shitty corpocentrism and hope that voters prefer corpocentrism (clothed fascism) over naked fascism again in two and four years. Fuck that and fuck them, Hogg can take my energy and blast those fossilized assholes with a spirit bomb.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Okay but the point is they should've been able to run a wet paper bag against Trump and win.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

AOC is a clear choice, I'd say Bernie but I'm already tired of old people in power.

AOC is young, in touch with actual issues, in touch with the generations that are moving the economy, knows the struggle since she used to be a waitress and so far I haven't seen her go crazy on anyone else's agenda or buying stocks and enriching herself beyond measure like damn old hag Pelosi.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 days ago

and conspire to defeat whatever progressive is winning, even though they’ll be the only one that can defeat trump’s third term

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 20 points 4 days ago

We have two corporate parties, the status quo and the controlled opposition. They occasionally switch labels but until we get the corporate out, we will never have a real choice.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (4 children)

It'll be Shapiro or Blinken. Its still all about the $$ at the DNC. Nothing else matters.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I still feel like the dnc is going to lean heavy into Buttigieg. He's young, an eloquent speaker, a sharp debater. He clearly is down to play ball with the dnc establishment as they want him to (stepped aside for Biden to get a cabinet position) , and they hope that he's baggage free enough (Kamala and her Marijuana prosecutions) that progressives will vote for him. Yes, he's gay, and the hardcore magats won't like that, but I think older suburban voters would rather have someone sane that's gay than insane and straight.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If Josh Shapiro wins the nomination I will not vote for him, I cannot stand this nonsense, this is absolute insanity. How the hell are modern Democrats less progressive than FDR (and he was a massive racist), we are a century ahead yet we are centuries behind. Now we're fighting over which fascist is more palatable so when can whitewash them and call them progressive. I voted for Kamala in 2024 but NOT AGAIN, I will NOT vote for another mild flavor of fascism lite.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 17 points 4 days ago (5 children)

This whole discussion has been a fascinating read in the comments.

But does anyone really think we're going to have another election? Much less a non-rigged election?

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The system was already rigged, of course. Electoral college, absentee cancelations, felons disqualified. It was broken before so even if things stayed the same (which they won't) it'll still be broken.

I do expect elections to continue. Just much less honestly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, let's get preemptively angry at those not currently in power for something we assume they'll do!

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's truly the "progressive" way. That and never actually voting in a primary.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (13 children)

Really, how do we get viable third parties? How do we change the voting system to not have " spoiler candidates "? The binary is rotting us.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

You go out and work in the primaries.

Look at AOC. The guy she ousted was a mainstay of the NY Democratic Party for decades.

If you wait until the general election you get no input.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not by going directly for a moonshot at the presidency. You spend years getting people involved in local politics, then work your way up. State and local governments have power, even if it's "boring".

That or a coup or other violent, abrupt, wildcards.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Local government isn't boring. It's infuriating. It's like if you gave the worst HOAs a police force.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

how do we get viable third parties?

By having a third party that's willing to put in the work and do things the right way.

So, instead of having a do-nothing candidate like Jill Stein who shows up right before every election, then disappears again after only obtaining a half of a single percent of the total votes, we'd have to have a third party that started focusing on winning local/state elections. That would allow them to start having more than ZERO members in the houses of Congress, which is currently the case. And once they have members in Congress, from various districts around the country, then they'd have a real chance at running a presidential candidate who can win.

Make no mistake. Anyone that currently votes for a 3rd party candidate for president is an utter fool. And there are A LOT of them on Lemmy. A 3rd party cannot win. They are nowhere near winning. Because they haven't put in the work to create a coalition to actually start having a presence in our government.

[–] ChokingHazard@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Don’t neglect that Stein was a Russian plant to spoil the election. Follow the money and Stein’s activities pre and post election.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

A lot more people than the DNC are blaming people for not voting Democrat & sticking us with this shithole administration. It was a huge no-brainer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 days ago

Yes AOC #2, but Kamala...

Writing was on the wall here. Need to get rid of the dinosaurs to have any chance at all.

[–] projektilski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago (6 children)

But people are stupid and they DID vote wrong. They had a choice and they chose wrong.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

You mean Hilary. This is clearly the chance to beat that dead horse again!

[–] FlapJackFlapper@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I'm a progressive, but also a pragmatist and a realist, and I find these kind of complaints unhelpful and naive. Politics is a blood sport and it always has been. No one is going to hand AOC the reins of power. She has to win them, and her opponents aren't going to play fair. This is, sadly, how the game is played. Don't mourn. Organize!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›