this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
520 points (92.6% liked)

Political Memes

7904 readers
2679 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 78 points 1 week ago (9 children)

As someone from a post-soviet country, and had to live in one of those.. there's plenty of reasons to shit on them.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Indeed. There is a hierarchy.

Commie blocks are better than tents.

But proper social housing is better than commie blocks.

And proper social housing mixed with middle class owner-occupied housing in the same neighborhoods and even within the same buildings is the best.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly if I wasn't busy at work I'd make a whole list of why commie blocks are bad, including why they hardly make good social housing

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago

For anyone interested, there are multitudes of videos on YouTube showing commie blocks and why they are bad, so don't feel bad for focusing on work.

Anyone interested can find the information with an easy search.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are they better than nothing?

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the same way being shot in the liver is better than being shot in the back of the head, sure. But if I saw someone saying victims of shootings that got bodyshot are "shitting on it for no reason" and "they only hate that their bullet scar is ugly" I'd call them out too.

Just cause something is better than the absolute worst doesn't mean it's immune from all criticism. There's probably a fallacy name for this, but I don't know it off the top of my head.. I shall call it "the starving kid fallacy" for now after the classic example of "there are starving kids in africa so you should eat your vegetables" that parents do.. and it the same way OP is doing by saying "there are homeless people, so you should be content with living in a commie block". It's just guilt tripping people for being dissatisfied with their situation for no particular gain other than a perceived moral high ground

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eistari@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

there was a project to move people from favellas to social housing. Didn't work for a few reasons, including long commute time to and from work and no infrastructure. People in the streets have a working community that helps them survive, simply moving them to hellscrapers destroys it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Ok im gonna try typing out some of the observations of living in commie blocks from personal experience as well as some stories from my friends. Im also spoilering it for anyone who doesn't want to read the list.. also also.. not a comprehensive list of everything, just what I can think of on my lunch break

here goes

  • The first thing to point out in my opinion is the construction: The construction of these were often rushed so at best they require expensive renovations and at worst they collapse, see tofu dreg in china
  • Safety: This is something I remember from my safety classes back in school. We had to make a fire escape plan for our houses, with at least 2 exits.. which I really struggled with cause I lived on a high floor, so no jumpimg out the window, and no fire escapes only meant I could do 1. So the commie apartments don't meet our modern safety standards
  • Location: A lot of this down to the economic collapse of various commusist countries, but many of them are quite literally in a middle of nowhere, in terms of finding a job. This is something I struggled with a lot, cause any job I could find would require a car to commute
  • Parking space: The commie blocks were often designed with green space in mind which would be nice, if they weren't also not designed with the idea of every household having a car, so when you have 16 parking spaces and the rest of the 40 cars in the mud that was once grass they start to look a lot more depressing
  • Accesability: The majority of commie blocks had no elevators, with the exception of quite tall ones. And even then the elevator usually started at the first floor rather than ground floor. This means if you're disabled and the only available social housing is commie blocks.. tough shit cause you're not getting in. I know someone who's a single mother with a disabled adult daughter who's she the primary caretaker off. She would have to carry her daugher up and down a flight of stairs everyday, and then also drag the electric wheelchair up
  • Renovations: Pretty simple - the apartments are usually owned by individuals, rather than a housing company, and getting all 60 or so people to agree to renovate the outside of the building is imposible, with both poorer people and older people stubborn to change, as well as alcoholics and the like
  • Utilities/equipment: Many of the commie blocks in my area didn't have city gas, that means for cooking anything you either had to have an electric stove, or more commonly from what I've seen buy big gas tanks and lug them up to your floor. They also lacked extractor fans, so I hope you like greasy walls
  • Insulation: Have you seen soviet wall carpets? It's cause even with the windows closed you could feel the breeze through the walls. The winters there meant multiple jackets indoors, and the summers were unbearably hot too
  • Insulation pt 2: With high humidity it also meant mold. Fun right?
  • Insulation pt 3: No noise insulation either. At least meant the cops got called a lot for all the spousal abuse

Just to name a few :3.. im gonna go eat now

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Woah! Thanks for this, interesting hearing a firsthand account. Very similar to trailer park life in the US, in my experience. Public housing/the projects are also similar but I never spent much time in them, strong racial divide in most of the US between trailer parks and projects.

I'm assuming a fair amount of drugs/addiction, small scale petty crime, and domestic violence? Cookouts and parties? Is there pride in being from a commie block? Is there a culture and music? Also, while I'm blasting you with questions, any chance you know a good documentary or book/article?

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago

Drugs I didn't see much of in my town, alcoholism definitely.. though I know that in other areas there are drugs as well.. in terms of crime we mostly got general hooliganism, like throwing firecrackers or graffiti, as well as public drinking, not much theft and the like.. domestic violence was definitely something that happened a fair bit

Not much cookouts and parties in the commie blocks themsleves other than occasional family get togethers for the holidays that get out of hand. Generally in my country we were big on going to the countryside, so over the summer up until night the area would be quiet as everyone would go off to the lakeside to grill

In terms of pride, I wouldn't necessarily say anyone saw anyone any different depending on the housing they were from.. knew lots of people from all walks of life, and in general I don't think there was a major socioeconomic division in that regard :3.. the closest to a commie block culture you could define would be marozai as we called them, more commonly known as gopniks elsewhere - generally people who were low class workers skimming by in the soviet union, mostly categorized now as wearing tracksuits, public drinking and eating sunflower seeds, and usually working some under the table job like refurbishing cars bought from auctions and selling them as new, or working in unlicensed construction, though the majority of people living in commie blocks were just standard families you'd find anywhere. In terms of music around holidays when people would stay out late you'd mostly hear rap.. a lot of russian music too

And no particular documentaries im awere of that specifically talks about life in one of these areas heh

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Hey there, also lived in commie block (ground floor of the 10 level (+ground) one), wanna add few things!

  1. Ants and cockroaches. Always found they way in, even on higher levels! And once they are in, done, they ain't going out.
  2. Outside look. Dunno how yours looked, but mine were all gray with corrugated steel at sides and a few stripes top-bottom of paint that was of unsaturated yellow, red or blue.
  3. But also good sides. We had pre-school, primary and middle school pretty much encircled with our commie blocks (lucky to be in town). Also a trading centre with bunch of small shops, one market, few services and post office. And a lot of small local shops.
  4. A lot of green and playgrounds. ^^
  5. Spoopy windows. I believe I lived with the original windows, when it was windy, they tried to be spoopy (oooooOoooOooooo). Good luck sleepin during thunderstorm.

Also, bonus point for specifically my neighbourhood - it was built on cementary. We had a lot of weird phenomena, I learnt where it was built much later after moving out.

Now, miracle happened as they renovated these! Got proper insulation and paint, and they look nice now. They also moved down some green space outside the circle and made more parking, leaving inner greenery intact.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The ants one is real x3.. they were all over the place even on the 4th floor. No cockroaches where I lived but a ton of wasps.. I think the wasps were nesting in the walls

And the whistling windows too hah

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Although it does appear that living in them was better than living in a tent and perhaps led to living in a better housing situation? Unless the place was demolished after you moved out, it would be better than a tent for someone else.

Bad housing is better than no housing, largely in part that it helps people get out of the inertia and deathspiral of homelessness.

There's a minimum a society should provide, and public housing at least can satisfy that.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago

Not disagreeing there. My one and only argument to make here is literally "I disagree with the statement that people shit on commie blocks for no reason, as they aren't nice places to live". Obviously I have lived in one, and it's definitely preferable to nothing, so.. it's not like im saying "demolish commie blocks, and discontinue social housing" (the ones that do get major renovations are even quite nice :3.. definitely think there should still be more accessible options for social housing needs tho) just saying that the situation of living in one, as portrayed in the meme isn't ideal

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

We should absolutely provide public housing and hopefully it’s nicer than commie blocks lmao.

The point is people were removed from their homes and placed in commie blocks. The conditions were horrible and it’s all well documented since the wall fell. People shit on commie blocks because of the authoritarian history and not the fact that it’s a way to house homeless people. I’m not sure if I would prefer a communist block over a tent on a California beach to be honest I’ve only done one though.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Well, this picture is just poor city development. Living in appartement buildings 3-5-7-9 floors high is all very fine, IF

  • The neighbourhood is (pedestrian) permeable enough. The space around it must be pedestrian/cycle friendly and green. The blocks in this picture are way to wide, forming too big barriers for local slow traffic
  • there is a bit of variation in colour, size, shape. A neighbourhood with such blocks can surely have 4 identical buildings, but not 30... It feels uneasy to humans this way. We need a taller or oddly shaped or nicely coloured one once in a while, as a reference point, as things that give the neighbourhood a bit of an identity
  • The buildings themselves are high enough quality (well insulated, every appartement has 1 or 2 real balconies, ...)
  • there are plenty of playgrounds and sports facilities and cars are in general carparks in garages at the edge of the neighbourhood, not on the streets
  • neighbourhood is well connected to the rest of the city
  • there are plenty of jobs in the area. Probably the hardest part.
[–] albert180@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not rocket science. Vienna did this once. Also you don't need car parks if a city is well designed. Public Transport and Carsharing is enough

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alterlaa

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

The original commieblocks were fairly walkable, with parks, schools, grocery stores, and so on nearby. I'm personally a fan of making all the buildings concrete blocks and then getting a bunch of local mural artists to paint them for visual distinction.

[–] GTG3000@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

May I introduce you to the concept of microdistrict. That's how the original soviet developments were planned out - every house is guaranteed to have necessities like stores, a polyclinic, a school, a kindergarden, or a fire department within reasonable distance. Usually, walking distance. Everything is pedestrian permeable, there's public transport connecting the "sleeping districts" where there were mostly apartments to the industrial areas where the jobs were. And yeah, playgrounds in or near every building.

Jobs in the same area as apartments isn't really happening though, office buildings and industry tends to be away.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Don't forget access to businesses - I don't know the stats for 3 floor developments but 5 is already plenty to support nearly all your needs within at most a 15 minute walk.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The projects were a flawed concept not least because it concentrates inequality leading to the obvious results.

So instead we have a morass of inscrutable regulations on 3-4 levels (federal, state, county, city) with wildly complex funding schemes making the few expert developers wildly wealthy while building tragically few affordable units.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not just the concentration of inequality. Also there was often no infrastructure, no shops, no pubs, no nothing, super thin walls, so you could hear all your neighbours, terrible heat isolation... not so different from the tents but higher concentration of people, which made it worse. In many post-communist countries those were later remade into livable places, but it took lots of time and money to do so. Totalitarian regimes suck.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

all I see are 2 examples of brutalism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, the people shitting on "commie blocks" usually don't mind that homeless people are barely considered human by the law... so they'd probably be on board with the idea of sending the police to slash all these tents

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Oh there is a reason

These commies blocks don't just look ugly, they tend to become a crime riddled dump

Then again, you can also build affordable housing that doesn't look like a prison system?

[–] j5906@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are very common in Germany and are in general really safe, the only crime going on there was smoking pot (which is not a crime anymore). I myself did not grow up in one, but many friends have and I still frequently visit people there. Floors, stairs and elevators are clean, neighbours greet you, when someone new moves in its common to help them as a neighbour.

Recently one of these houses was in the news "weißer Riese" in Duisburg because of crime. Now Duisburg is basically Germanys Detroit, used to be a coal mining city and has nothing else going on for it (still the homicide rate for Duisburg is 20x lower than for Detroit lol). And this house is 55years old and has been neglected by the developers, so rent for an apartment there is basically the lowest of any German city and in Germanys most undesirable city and somehow people wonder why there is some crime and this becomes the stereotype for all "commie blocks".

But for every commie block like that you get 1000 others that are really safe and clean, offer cheap rent, are energy efficient as fuck, some even have their own bus or train stations, big playground in the middle and usually more on the edge of the city so closer to nature.

This stereotype thing about commie blocks always reminds me of the american homeless people sleeping in tents in front of the "victims of communism" museum...

load more comments (1 replies)

All the Projects in major cities are an example. But it isn’t the buildings’ fault. It just putting a lot of poor people with lots of problems all in one place tends to concentrate all the ills that go along with poverty.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

These commies blocks don't just look ugly, they tend to become a crime riddled dump

It will surprise you, but this is other way around. Hruschevkas have less crime than modern humant colonies.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The alternative, tent cities like skid row, are pretty crime-heavy. I've never heard about commie blocks being especially crime ridden, but I guess you have good reason to say what you did and aren't just pulling it straight out your ass.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Cabrini Green immediately comes to mind. The police used to get sniped in the parking lot.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabrini%E2%80%93Green_Homes

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People shitting on commie blocks, but there's millions who would love to have a roof and plumbing.

The more densely we live, the more land that can be left wild/rewilded. We're not entitled to a tick tacky vinyl wrapped house surrounded by lawns and pavement. Our earth is fucked and getting more so by the day. It's a problem that can only be solved by us all living smaller lives.

I always tell people to look to Hong Kong for housing practices. They don't do everything right, but they're definitely on the right track.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I demand my own little box on a hillside!

[–] kaprap@leminal.space 4 points 1 week ago

Support state owned apartments!

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean the US has much less soulless housing, and we have enough housing for everyone. The issue is we have a society that doesn't care to house the homeless.

The issues with the brutalist blocs built in Eastern Europe is usually more about the soulessness and drearineess of the architecture.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

People on the streets is far more soulless than gray concrete housing. Especially because concrete can at least be painted over to make it look better.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I think you misunderstood my point. That concrete block design came about due to a push for efficency and quickly rebuilding post WWII. So it was either house more people quickly or nice looking houses.

The US hasn't really ever had to make that decision. We have enough houses as is for the homeless. The design of our homes/apartment buildings is not our limiting factor, it's our policies and approach to housing and the homeless.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The commie blocks also had smart city planning, like you had a supermarket and everything else in walking range, and no through traffic. I do think they could be designed and build a bit nicer with modern technology. Especially higher ceilings and thicker walls. And then put those blocks out into nature or agricultural land and connect them via high speed rail or a self driving shuttle bus.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

Affordable housing doesnt need to be expensive. You can have pretty nice midrises for very cheap. Design like 20 different models, all of em in 5 different colours, thats 100 different styles of apartment buildings and you just dont put two of the same next to eachother and problem solved. Mass produced, colourful, nice, cheap, housing.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I'll take "How the government can't solve your problems with unlimited money" for a preferential bread line or $1000 Alex.

load more comments
view more: next ›