this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
937 points (96.3% liked)

memes

18021 readers
2225 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So... if you don't live your life automatically assuming that every stranger is a threat, you don't waste time and effort with small talk.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think the total opposite, people who value small talk assume every stranger is someone to value and attempt to connect with, whereas people who frown at or avoid small talk are often the ones assuming some pretty negative things about others

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's pretty unfair to the 10 to 20 % neurodiverses.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, this is a total generalization. I'm ADHD AF and I love small talk. I'm very earnestly never "testing" people, either.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

people who value small talk assume every stranger is someone to value and attempt to connect with

Strictly based on OP, people who value small talk assume every stranger is someone who needs to be assessed as a possible threat, and must "prove that we can get along". They might be someone to value and attempt to connect with, but that is indeterminate until tested. The small talk is the test.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (5 children)

You really don't understand this hooman communication thing, do you?

So let me try to parse this; Your interactions with others is on a purely transactional basis?

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not OP but mine are, anything wrong with it? Communication aims at information exchange, if you wanna say hey just say hey, we don't need to waste away doing empty, false gestures at each other. You want to learn something I know? Happy to help! Vice versa? I hope you also don't mind.

Wanna waste air with saying empty words, devoid of any actual meaning? You'd get the most appropriate version of "Yeah" and a stare urging you to get to the point.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 days ago

Communication aims at information exchange,

Metadata is data. Skipping small talk is exchanging less information.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Can we not belittle each other, it's such a conversation ender.

I do think there are people who are going to be purely transactional, myself included. I don't know why, maybe it's rooted in insecurity, maybe it's lack of attention span from perpetually being online that's rewired our simulation receptors that don't get anything from trying to discover connections.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 2 days ago

The statement in your posted image frames the interaction in question ("small talk") as purely transactional. I am working inside that context. You seem to be drawing "understanding" from some external context which has not been presented here.

[–] sgtpugg@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My attention and time are not something others should feel entitled to have.