this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
543 points (95.2% liked)

Political Memes

8791 readers
3130 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 199 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I've been saying since 2016 that Sanders' executive orders alone would have moved the US further in the right direction than any president since LBJ.

The last six months of Donald Trump have proven that. The presidency has all the power any party needs if they actually want to do real good.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 121 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

I think its hilarious how before Trumps 2nd term, the libshits would argue "but if they use executive orders to push through {legalization of abortion, marijuana, socialized healthcare, public transit, any number of good left leaning policies} the R's will do it back when theyre back in office!!

Now look where we are.

fucking libshits and MAGAts.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 64 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah so Biden did an executive order to forgive student debt, it got challenged in the courts and so it didn't happen.

People saying "Democrats should just do executive orders like Trump does" need to look into who's on the Supreme Court.

The "do everything by EO" strat only works for a party that has had a loyal voting base for decades so they have control of the courts.

Sorry to interrupt the "both sides" narrative leftists/MAGAs love so much.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 40 points 15 hours ago

No, the real strat is to ram hundreds of EOs through so fast the courts don't have time to shoot them all down. And then, I dunno, drone strike the opposition and call it an official presidential act cause evidently that's cool now.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Exactly, it was all set up in the first term. They not only got the Supreme Court but also put in place a record number of judges across the country as well. They went for the throat, and everyone let them. Now you have corrupt people everywhere they need to do whatever they want, and also showed that even if they do get shot down, they still don't listen, and nothing happens, so whats the actual point?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 hours ago

It doesn't hurt to try though. Make them actually shoot the EOs down. Don't just assume they will so you do nothing. Force their hand.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

^ This. If we're lucky enough to get a Democratic president willing to abuse the executive order system the way Trump is, and make no mistake, it IS abuse... the same Supreme Court that ruled "Well, the President can do it" would look at a Democratic President and go "Whoah, woah, whoah, we didn't mean YOU could do it."

[–] match@pawb.social 27 points 18 hours ago

we had better damn well put in a president who's gonna EO everything to the far left

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That’s still completely true. Not only that, Congress and SCOTUS can nullify any executive order.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

haha, yes they sure can. And they have! Look at how well its going!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

There are only "checks and balances" when all 3 branches of government are not fascist/corrupt.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, elder statesmen like Biden still believed in things like exercising power responsibly within the balance of power like many presidents before them.

That wasn't good enough, too many people took the "lesser evil" quote to heart. So now we have a dipshit writing EOs faster than the court system moves, and I hope there's a god to help the country get out of this.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

None of these things can be performed by executive order. A big reason that bill just had to be passed was his deportations and detainings couldn't be performed without money from Congress

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Let’s not forget they’ve spent the past 4-8 years putting their people into the right places to allow them to start doing whatever they want.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 2 points 10 hours ago

You say this as if the dems could have never done what they did.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

They have the house, senate, the courts and are all yes man followers.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

God forbid someone want to keep some semblance of democracy without completely giving up hope in a race to the bottom.

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sanders’ EOs with a conservative Supreme Court would have been unilaterally nullified. The conservative supermajority is what has allowed Trump to get away with the vast majority of this.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 56 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Sanders’ EOs with a conservative Supreme Court would have been unilaterally nullified.

If they'd run Sanders, they've had ended up with a Democratic supermajority. SCOTUS would have been largely irrelevant.

But it doesn't change facts. The powers of the presidency in the hands of an actual reformer, not a performative one like Biden or Obama, would have entailed true, fundamental change.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Sanders couldn't even win the Democratic primary. What makes you think he stood a chance at winning the election?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Good morning.

Respectfully, what you're repeating here is a lie. The primaries were rigged against Bernard Sanders, and when the Democratic Party was later sued for it, they admitted it. The bummer here is that in rigging primaries for Clinton, Democrats not only gave us Donald Trump, but also gave Trump control of Congress at the same time.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago

Rigged how, exactly? Were all the voters that didn't vote for Bernie in on the conspiracy?

Bernie lost, he wasn't popular enough. Get over it.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Any good candidate would lose the democratic primary.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That’s wholly incorrect. The only reason Trump’s executive orders have any power is due to the full majority support of the Republican-controlled Congress and the conservative SCOTUS.

Democrats forced a 15-day vote on the constitutionality of Trump’s initial purse-control power grab. The Republican majority redefined the entire congressional calendar as a single day, just to a valid holding the vote.

This amount of control comes from the abject loyalty of all three branches.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

This amount of control comes from the abject loyalty of all three branches.

How did that happen? Didn't the dems do something? Wasn't Biden fighting this super hard for 4 years? \s

[–] mapu@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago