this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
502 points (97.9% liked)

memes

18449 readers
2535 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The top car is a 1956 Astra-Gnome concept car (never actually manufactured for us). Photo credit / more info: https://www.petersen.org/vehicle-spotlights/1956-astra-gnome

The bottom vehicle is a dumpster sold by a wanker.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 29 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 5 points 15 hours ago

A seperate bubble compartment for the kids, and offroad tires. I mean, I'd buy it. Though $82,000 is still a steep price for a car, even now.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 9 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It’s the car Bladerunner would drive. You know, Bladerunner, from Bladerunner. By Ridleyscott.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

You know, the original book isn't even called "Bladerunner." It's called "Do Bladerunners dream of running blades?" Ridleyscott changed it based on some Rutgers Howie improv.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

THAT’S NOT THE CHARACTER’S NAME YOU WEIRDO TECH BRO!

Yes I am mad at Elon. Blade Runner: The Final Cut is my favorite movie.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

Next you’re gonna tell me he doesn’t even run blades.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Still waiting for a KDE steering wheel

[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

Keering Keel

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 12 hours ago

A Gnoming wheel?

[–] Raxiel@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

I don't get it, because I can't see enough of the car behind that dumpster to understand the point

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What's the concept/name/model?

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 12 hours ago

Any specific reason for the 2 separate engines?
What's the advantage?

All I can think of is that you might be running a much lower powered, single engine when not in 4WD mode.

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 6 points 19 hours ago

That one in the top looks like it was created in Spore

[–] genuineparts@infosec.pub 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I understand, and it's wonderful you don't care whether anyone questions your sexual orientation

I care! I care plenty! I just don't know how to make them stop!

I know it's a different show, but... I dunno. Suck a butt or something. At least it's the same car

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 16 hours ago

Past promised pedestrians slasher and present delivers.

[–] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The funny thing is that even if cybertruck wasn't absolutely demolished it still wasn't even close to astra-gnome

[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 3 points 14 hours ago

Are you suggesting I picked the worst image of a cybertruck I could find? (I did. :) )

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I'm waaaaayyyyy too orange-pilled for this. Both images are wrong.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

FYI this is also slang for "Bitcoin enthusiast".

[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 3 points 22 hours ago

They are the same picture.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm ok not having the bubble boat car. Of course, having better, more affordable EV options here in the US would be nice. But a lot of people don't like EVs. Not sure why, but if you just gotta have your ICE vehicle, run it on biofuels that are at least renewable. Some of y'all are ridiculous: "Electric car? Biofuels? No, I HAVE to have an internal combustion engine, and it HAS to run on FOSSIL FUELS only!" Why?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Big problem with biofuels currently is production. We haven't figured out how to grow enough food AND biomass for fuel.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

And a bunch of the food is more or less fossil fuels turned into corn. Solar+wind+battery with some nuclear power mixed in is probably the way, but long haul transport might be able to work on bio if we could get out of the growth only economy of late stage of capitalism.

I sometimes imagine a world where we make things that last, or can be repaired and our population has leveled off so that we can stop making the line go up and just keep it at some sustainable level. A lot of thing could change and keep us all happy.

Maybe my kid’s grandkids will see it.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Then get an EV. Or drive less, or just pay the premium for biofuels, if you absolutely MUST have an internal combustion engine.

We have to stop using fossil fuels. We just have to. And it's not just about the climate, although that should be reason enough. Fossil fuels are non-renewable. Once fossil fuel reserves are depleted, they cannot be replenished on human timescales. And I know, I know, people will swear up and down that we're not in danger of fossil fuel reserves becoming depleted anytime soon, but it's inevitable, even if it isn't imminent.

Plus, we've already depleted most of the reserves that were relatively cheap and easy to extract, so what's left is only going to get more difficult and more expensive to get out of the ground. Oil extraction would have peaked a long time ago if we didn't start using more expensive extraction methods like hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which comes with its own ecological issues.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I ride a bike and take public transit.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Good! Whatever people can do to stop using fossil fuels is what needs to happen.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I guarantee getting another 30 years out of my 30 year old car is lower impact than buying a new one because it's electric

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Look, maybe you will be able to get another 30 years out of your car, and if so good for you, but eventually we have to stop using fossil fuels. That's all I'm saying. The longer we keep using oil, the more impacts on the climate. But also, the more oil we use, the faster it runs out. And once it's gone, it's just gone. Forever, no more. Sure, we probably won't run out in 30 years, but it is a finite resource so we run out eventually. I just don't know why people are in such a hurry to completely use it all up as quickly as possible, especially knowing what it's doing to the climate. I just don't get it.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This just shows that personal automobiles are bullshit. A bicycle has not changed fundamentally in over 100 years, meanwhile cars are constantly changing for no discernable reason.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The internal combustion engine is fundamentally unchanged since invention, so is the electric motor, both well over 100 years old too.

And personal automobiles are still fundamentally the same as a horse driven carriage: four wheels with a box on top for seating and sheltering from weather, and a driver in front for steering. The first mechanically driven carriage even predates the bike by more than 200 years.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

The bicycle has changed quite a bit in the last hundred years. The modern derailleur was introduced in the 1930s. Moving the shifters to the handles was more recent. Clipless pedals and disc brakes were both introduced in the 70s. Carbon fiber frames reduced their weight substantially.

Their basic shape hasn’t changed much, but everything else has.

[–] toothpaste_sandwich@thebrainbin.org 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, they both look like they would obliterate any unfortunate pedestrian they'd come in contact with... But the top one moreso. It'd cut them in half.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

As oppsed to the deer thay got cut in half by a wank panzer?

I'm just saying the top one would do even more damage. They're both terrible 🙈

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 18 hours ago

Mad Max was also a promise, or something like that.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

i think i had that shaver

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

Imagine a rollover incident in the top one.

[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Wanted THUNDERCOUGARFALCONBIRD

Got demented rusty swastikar

This is not the future I signed up for