this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
772 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5194 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has become so integral to online navigation that its name became a verb, meaning "to find things on the Internet." Soon, Google might just tell you what's on the Internet instead of showing you. The company has announced an expansion of its AI search features, powered by Gemini 2.0. Everyone will soon see more AI Overviews at the top of the results page, but Google is also testing a more substantial change in the form of AI Mode. This version of Google won't show you the 10 blue links at all—Gemini completely takes over the results in AI Mode.

This marks the debut of Gemini 2.0 in Google search. Google announced the first Gemini 2.0 models in December 2024, beginning with the streamlined Gemini 2.0 Flash. The heavier versions of Gemini 2.0 are still in testing, but Google says it has tuned AI Overviews with this model to offer help with harder questions in the areas of math, coding, and multimodal queries.

With this update, you will begin seeing AI Overviews on more results pages, and minors with Google accounts will see AI results for the first time. In fact, even logged out users will see AI Overviews soon. This is a big change, but it's only the start of Google's plans for AI search.

Gemini 2.0 also powers the new AI Mode for search. It's launching as an opt-in feature via Google's Search Labs, offering a totally new alternative to search as we know it. This custom version of the Gemini large language model (LLM) skips the standard web links that have been part of every Google search thus far.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 207 points 5 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (12 children)

Does EVERY axis in life have to be fucked up at the same time?

Can we have one thing that is just doing ok?

Government - fucked.

Education - fucked.

Healthcare - fucked.

Environment - fucked.

Housing - fucked.

Societal and Social Cohesion - fucked.

Wealth Inequality - fucked.

Personal Technological Autonomy - fucked, and under continuous attack.

Technological Enshittification - Running like gangbusters. So really - fucked.

Damn, someone give me some kind of ladder to climb out of this pit of despair.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 157 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Every single one of these flows from wealth inequality.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 36 points 5 days ago

Excellent point!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

They also flow from corruption (regulatory capture/failure to enforce anti-trust and other consumer-protection law). It's hard to say whether that is itself a cause or result of wealth inequality, though.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Nintendo, when chasing developers of emulators and modders, uses regulatory mechanisms. IP is such a mechanism initially. Intended to protect the little guy from big bad corporations.

It’s hard to say whether that is itself a cause or result of wealth inequality, though.

It's both of course. Only time flows in one direction and never the other.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] singletona@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The ladder has been privatized.

You get the greased pole.

I know it isn't much, but services like mastodon, lemmy, kbin, friendica, Peertube, etc have shown me there is connected pushback.

Tilde communities have given me something smaller scale to focus on.

https://tildeverse.org/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Every civilization rises and falls. We're on the down slope ATM. Sorry. The 80s and 90s were pretty nice in America!

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 21 points 5 days ago

That feel when the Matrix actually called it

[–] slumberlust@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Problems exist, but there's never been a safer time to be a homosapien on Earth. A book called Abundance helped me gain a little perspective in these gloomy days.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 87 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Technofascists really benefit from certain kinds of information being inaccessible…

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 4 days ago (1 children)

fascists really love LLM's. like ridiculously in love with them. it's where all their 'art' comes from. it's made of the shallow aesthetics with no interiority they love so much. plus it doesn't really require articulating your desires much, or having artists.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

To borrow Alex Jones’ term - it is information warfare. Train people to accept the outputs of LLMs, attack media literacy (in conjunction with the fact that public schools in the US spent ten years not teaching children how to read), and hide actual sources.

You can have your LLM trained to weasel around the fact that the chattel slavery of black Americans was the primary cause of the Civil War, or falsely represent science surrounding gender and sexuality (they’re explicitly tuning Grok on this).

You don’t have to worry about subversive messages on war or women in your “AI” generated “Ghibhli” film. Have all the fun space faring of Star Wars, without the prequel geopolitics everyone hated until they saw it happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 85 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Would this be the same AI that spits out incorrect summarys or just flat out gets data incorrect constantly? What could possibly go wrong by making that the ONLY way to look for things going forward. Fucking morons.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 75 points 5 days ago

I am no longer feeling lucky

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 49 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The future is coming and it sure looks like garbage. I have long since left Google behind.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

It’s been a long time I use DuckDuckGo as my default search engine for basic stuff (which let’s be honest, more than 80% is just a simple query to find a certain area of some website, like “Firefox download Windows”, “Discord site status”, “Microsoft office pricing” etc.). If I want to search something more related to my own language or recent events in my county, Google is a must, but that’s like 10% of all my search engine usage. I don’t really need Google to know about the other 90%.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Djfok43@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 4 days ago

Capitalism. Next question...

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago

Sounds cool, can’t wait!

collapsed inline media

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, in theory I don't have a problem with an AI telling me the answer to my question or whatever I'm searching for - but this isn't a web search. If I'm actually searching for a particular page or context, then I want to be able to do that.

These are two entirely different things, and if Google goes down this route they aren't a search engine anymore - they are an LLM provider.

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Couldn't agree more. I use both tools as they have their place, but when I want a search engine, I don't want to get an AI answer for the result. Like if I'm searching for documentation on something, what benefit would the AI provide me over just giving the link?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

Yes, the problem is that the place for LLM "search results" is the garbage can.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I'm decrepit enough to remember pre-Google web, with competing search engines. Bring back webrings!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] oh_@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AI is over hyped and doesn’t need to be shoved in our faces. Ugh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

Stick to SEARCH, not making shit up (euphemistically called "hallucinating").

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 17 points 3 days ago

Unlike most of Lemmy, I actually like AI and even I don't want this.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is this for human beings, or is it for Google to show their investors to prove that AI is totally going to revolutionize something eventually?

Screw Google either way, I'm not going to use their search engine either way, but this doesn't feel like a product they are genuinely committed to releasing. Maybe I'm wrong, and in that case, screw them even more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Apoplexy@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (4 children)

How many cases of "You should eat at least one small rock per day" AI bullshit does Google think is acceptable for production deployment?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wait, google does searches now too? Wow they have a service for everything.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

The model uses "advanced reasoning, thinking, and multimodal capabilities"...

Well, LLM's are incapable of actually doing the first two, so we're already off to a great start.

I don't think it's much in the way of hyperbole to say that if they make this the default or worse, only search output option then this will be the thing that literally destroys the company.

No one except idiotic boardroom denizens actually wants this. Google failing to provide actual search results is the singular one and only thing that could actually get users to switch away from using it -- and not do that thing where they just grumble and bitch and moan but keep using it anyway. And if no one is searching on Google then nobody is seeing ads on Google, which means Google will not be selling ads.

I will laugh so hard if this happens.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dear Google,

Literally no one wants this.

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Nope. Plenty of people want this.

In the last few years I've seen plenty of cases where CS undergrad students get stumped if ChatGPT is unable to debug/explain a question to them. I've literally heard "idk because ChatGPT can't explain this lisp code" as an excuse during office hours.

Before LLMs, there were also a significant amount of people who used GitHub issues/discord to ask simple application usage questions instead of Googling. There seems to be a significant decrease of people's willingness to search for an answer regardless of AI tools existing.

I wonder if it has to do with weaker reading comprehension skills?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

I don't need to care. I stopped using Google search months ago.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 days ago (8 children)

startpage. you're welcome.

it's also not us owned or based.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⠟⠛⢉⣁⣀⠉⠉⢛⣿⣿⡛⠉⠁⣀⣉⡉⠛⢿⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣷⣾⠟⠋⣡⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⣈⠙⠻⣷⣾⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⡿⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⡇⠀⠀⢀⣠⣤⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣦⣄⡀⠀⠀⢸⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢿⣦⣄⣈⠙⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⢉⣁⣤⣴⡿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⣿⣿⣷⡄⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⢰⣿⣿⣿⠟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠙⠿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢸⠿⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

[–] luce@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Computerchairgeneral@fedia.io 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thanks Google, I hate it. At least the udm=14 trick and website still works, at least until google decides to stop supporting that feature. Definitely going to be using that more and more if this becomes the default google experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grepe@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

thinking google is about offering you a quality search at this point is like thinking facebook is about improving your social experience. they both started like that and that's how they hooked people up. but they have their own interests now. those interests revolve around affecting how people act and think. one central thing they need to do to fulfil those interests is controlling what people see and know... and that's very hard to do when this pesky external content generated by other that is hard to control gets into way...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] singletona@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

When I use a web search tool I want to look at the websites themselves. Not having to go through Gemini (the AI not the protocol) telling me what IT thinks I want...

Assuming AGI ever develops and bothers to sift through data. I've no problem with AI as a tool (that is, Dumb AI like we currently have.)

When I'm doing a web search rather than actually calling up Gemini (The AI not the Protocol) I want a WEB SEARCH... that means I am not looking to use AI. I'm wanting to use OI (Organic Intelligence.)

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 days ago

Considering how often Google's AI hallucinates some garbage for an answer this is going to be terrible

[–] XenoK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don't really get Google's angle since it's pretty obvious that their AI search sucks. Maybe it's just to impress shareholders?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, they're ruining their search anyways. It's almost unusable at this point, it's like asking for relevant ads and two year old Reddit posts

Is it censorship? Did they decide to just straight up sell SEO? Are websites locking down and blocking their crawlers to stop AI training crawlers?

I legitimately find Bing to be better at this point, but whatever they're doing it's maddening. Even better AI assisted web searches kinda suck because the data fed into them is more of the same

But solid chance they're trying to boost Gemini, which has been a shockingly bad llm for a company that basically wrote the book on AI not too long ago

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Ok, but why should I go to Google for ai answers when I can get the same from openai, other models or even local installations without all the ads?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately this isn’t about you, but the 90% of people who don’t understand what AI is at all and don’t give a shit where the responses come from as long as “scorpio dream meaning high school teacher truck” and “can you gregnant with cousin?” Give them answers they like

/s to an extent, but here we are

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›